根据1908年《民事诉讼法》第37号命令,发票可以作为提起诉讼的依据吗?

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Shivam Goel
{"title":"根据1908年《民事诉讼法》第37号命令,发票可以作为提起诉讼的依据吗?","authors":"Shivam Goel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3337317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A suit which seeks to recover a debt or a liquidated demand in money payable by the defendant arising out of a written contract is maintainable under Order 37, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as a summary suit. It is settled law that invoices/ bills are “written contracts” within the contemplation of Order 37, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.<br><br>Suits claiming amounts which are only balances due at the foot of account cannot be treated as falling under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 because the suit claim is based on the account and the amount claimed is not a liquidated amount arising/payable to the plaintiff on the instruments of limited types as specified under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Entries and statements of account have necessarily to be proved as per Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 for the balance at the foot of the account to be arrived at.","PeriodicalId":44862,"journal":{"name":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can an Invoice Be a Basis for Filing a Suit Under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908?\",\"authors\":\"Shivam Goel\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3337317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A suit which seeks to recover a debt or a liquidated demand in money payable by the defendant arising out of a written contract is maintainable under Order 37, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as a summary suit. It is settled law that invoices/ bills are “written contracts” within the contemplation of Order 37, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.<br><br>Suits claiming amounts which are only balances due at the foot of account cannot be treated as falling under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 because the suit claim is based on the account and the amount claimed is not a liquidated amount arising/payable to the plaintiff on the instruments of limited types as specified under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Entries and statements of account have necessarily to be proved as per Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 for the balance at the foot of the account to be arrived at.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Bankruptcy Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Bankruptcy Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3337317\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3337317","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据1908年《民事诉讼法》第37号命令第1条的规定,寻求追讨被告因书面合同而应支付的债务或已清算的款项的诉讼,可作为简易诉讼予以维持。根据1908年《民事诉讼法》第37号命令第2条的规定,发票/账单属于“书面合同”。索赔金额仅为帐户结余的诉讼不能被视为属于1908年《民事诉讼法》第37号命令,因为诉讼索赔是基于该帐户,而索赔金额不是根据1908年《民事诉讼法》第37号命令规定的有限类型文书产生/应付给原告的清算金额。根据1872年《印度证据法》第34条的规定,必须证明账户的分录和报表,才能达到账户底部的余额。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can an Invoice Be a Basis for Filing a Suit Under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908?
A suit which seeks to recover a debt or a liquidated demand in money payable by the defendant arising out of a written contract is maintainable under Order 37, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as a summary suit. It is settled law that invoices/ bills are “written contracts” within the contemplation of Order 37, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Suits claiming amounts which are only balances due at the foot of account cannot be treated as falling under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 because the suit claim is based on the account and the amount claimed is not a liquidated amount arising/payable to the plaintiff on the instruments of limited types as specified under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Entries and statements of account have necessarily to be proved as per Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 for the balance at the foot of the account to be arrived at.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信