代表伊丽莎白:斯宾塞,五因素模型,和女王的个性

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Spenser Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1086/717089
Donald V. Stump
{"title":"代表伊丽莎白:斯宾塞,五因素模型,和女王的个性","authors":"Donald V. Stump","doi":"10.1086/717089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Close analysis of Spenser’s six primary “mirrours” of Queen Elizabeth I—Gloriana, Una, Belphoebe, Britomart, Mercilla, and Cynthia—suggests that they go beyond representations of the queen’s moral character to reveal traits of personality. Drawing on the Five-Factor Model that dominates current studies of personality, this essay interrogates the historical accuracy of Spenser’s composite portrait of the queen. Having served under or befriended two of Elizabeth’s most intimate favorites, one of her bishops, and a number of her chief courtiers and soldiers, he clearly had gleaned detailed knowledge of her nature. Yet on one primary trait he seems to misrepresent her, creating mirrors that oscillate between extraversion and introversion and tend to the latter. Two explanations are compelling: his views of ideal monarchy and womanly conduct and his unexpectedly subtle insights into personal psychology, particularly the behavior of neurotics. The explanation we choose depends on the Spenser we seek, whether the idealistic humanist, the shrewd political observer, or the intuitive psychologist. The fullest reading of the poem requires balancing all three, seeing the interplay involving the philosophical and theological allegory, the topical allegory focused on famous personalities of the day, and the psychological allegory intent on personality itself.","PeriodicalId":39606,"journal":{"name":"Spenser Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(Mis)representing Elizabeth: Spenser, the Five-Factor Model, and the Personality of the Queen\",\"authors\":\"Donald V. Stump\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/717089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Close analysis of Spenser’s six primary “mirrours” of Queen Elizabeth I—Gloriana, Una, Belphoebe, Britomart, Mercilla, and Cynthia—suggests that they go beyond representations of the queen’s moral character to reveal traits of personality. Drawing on the Five-Factor Model that dominates current studies of personality, this essay interrogates the historical accuracy of Spenser’s composite portrait of the queen. Having served under or befriended two of Elizabeth’s most intimate favorites, one of her bishops, and a number of her chief courtiers and soldiers, he clearly had gleaned detailed knowledge of her nature. Yet on one primary trait he seems to misrepresent her, creating mirrors that oscillate between extraversion and introversion and tend to the latter. Two explanations are compelling: his views of ideal monarchy and womanly conduct and his unexpectedly subtle insights into personal psychology, particularly the behavior of neurotics. The explanation we choose depends on the Spenser we seek, whether the idealistic humanist, the shrewd political observer, or the intuitive psychologist. The fullest reading of the poem requires balancing all three, seeing the interplay involving the philosophical and theological allegory, the topical allegory focused on famous personalities of the day, and the psychological allegory intent on personality itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spenser Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spenser Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/717089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spenser Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

仔细分析斯宾塞对伊丽莎白一世的六个主要“镜子”——格洛丽亚娜、尤娜、贝尔菲比、布里特玛、默西拉和辛西娅——表明,它们超越了对女王道德品质的表现,揭示了她的个性特征。利用主导当前人格研究的五因素模型,本文质疑斯宾塞对女王的合成肖像的历史准确性。他曾在伊丽莎白最亲密的两名亲信手下服役或与之交好,其中一人是她的主教,另一人是她的主要朝臣和士兵,显然他对伊丽莎白的性格了如指掌。然而,在一个主要特征上,他似乎歪曲了她,创造了一面在外向和内向之间摇摆的镜子,并倾向于后者。有两种解释是令人信服的:他对理想君主制和女性行为的看法,以及他对个人心理,尤其是神经症患者行为出乎意料的敏锐洞察力。我们选择的解释取决于我们所寻求的斯宾塞,是理想主义的人文主义者,精明的政治观察家,还是直觉的心理学家。全面阅读这首诗需要平衡这三者,看到哲学和神学寓言的相互作用,关注当时著名人物的主题寓言,以及关注个性本身的心理寓言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
(Mis)representing Elizabeth: Spenser, the Five-Factor Model, and the Personality of the Queen
Close analysis of Spenser’s six primary “mirrours” of Queen Elizabeth I—Gloriana, Una, Belphoebe, Britomart, Mercilla, and Cynthia—suggests that they go beyond representations of the queen’s moral character to reveal traits of personality. Drawing on the Five-Factor Model that dominates current studies of personality, this essay interrogates the historical accuracy of Spenser’s composite portrait of the queen. Having served under or befriended two of Elizabeth’s most intimate favorites, one of her bishops, and a number of her chief courtiers and soldiers, he clearly had gleaned detailed knowledge of her nature. Yet on one primary trait he seems to misrepresent her, creating mirrors that oscillate between extraversion and introversion and tend to the latter. Two explanations are compelling: his views of ideal monarchy and womanly conduct and his unexpectedly subtle insights into personal psychology, particularly the behavior of neurotics. The explanation we choose depends on the Spenser we seek, whether the idealistic humanist, the shrewd political observer, or the intuitive psychologist. The fullest reading of the poem requires balancing all three, seeing the interplay involving the philosophical and theological allegory, the topical allegory focused on famous personalities of the day, and the psychological allegory intent on personality itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spenser Studies
Spenser Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信