Monica L. Bianchini, Rachel M. Kenney, Robyn Lentz, M. Zervos, Manu Malhotra, S. Davis
{"title":"出院延误和费用与门诊肠外抗菌治疗有关的高价抗生素。","authors":"Monica L. Bianchini, Rachel M. Kenney, Robyn Lentz, M. Zervos, Manu Malhotra, S. Davis","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciz1076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nOutpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a widely-used safe and cost-effective treatment strategies. Most public and private insurance providers require prior authorization (PA) for OPAT, yet impact of the inpatient PA process is not known. This study aimed to characterize discharge barriers and PA delays associated with high-priced OPAT antibiotics.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIRB-approved study of adult patients discharged with high-priced OPAT antibiotics from January to December 2017. Antibiotics included: daptomycin, ceftaroline, ertapenem, and the novel beta-lactam beta-lactam inhibitor combinations. Patients with an OPAT PA delay were compared to patients without. Primary endpoint: total direct hospital costs from the start of treatment. Secondary outcomes: discharge delay and 30-day readmission or mortality.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTwo-hundred patients included: 141 (71%) no OPAT delay vs 59 (30%) OPAT delay. More patients with a PA delay were discharged to a sub-acute care facility compared to an outpatient setting: 37 (63%) vs 52 (37%), p=0.001. Discharge delays and median total direct hospital costs were higher in patients with OPAT delays: 31 (53%) vs 21 (15%), p<0.001; and $19,576 vs (IQR 10,056-37,038) vs $7,770 (IQR 3,031-13,974), p<0.001. In a multiple variable regression, discharge to a sub-acute care facility was associated with an increased odds of discharge delay while age over 64 years was associated with a decreased odds of discharge delay.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOPAT with high-priced antibiotics requires significant care coordination. PA delays for these antibiotics are common and contribute to discharge delays. OPAT transitions of care represent an opportunity to improve patient are and address access barriers.","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discharge Delays and Costs Associated with Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy for High priced Antibiotics.\",\"authors\":\"Monica L. Bianchini, Rachel M. Kenney, Robyn Lentz, M. Zervos, Manu Malhotra, S. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cid/ciz1076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nOutpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a widely-used safe and cost-effective treatment strategies. Most public and private insurance providers require prior authorization (PA) for OPAT, yet impact of the inpatient PA process is not known. This study aimed to characterize discharge barriers and PA delays associated with high-priced OPAT antibiotics.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nIRB-approved study of adult patients discharged with high-priced OPAT antibiotics from January to December 2017. Antibiotics included: daptomycin, ceftaroline, ertapenem, and the novel beta-lactam beta-lactam inhibitor combinations. Patients with an OPAT PA delay were compared to patients without. Primary endpoint: total direct hospital costs from the start of treatment. Secondary outcomes: discharge delay and 30-day readmission or mortality.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nTwo-hundred patients included: 141 (71%) no OPAT delay vs 59 (30%) OPAT delay. More patients with a PA delay were discharged to a sub-acute care facility compared to an outpatient setting: 37 (63%) vs 52 (37%), p=0.001. Discharge delays and median total direct hospital costs were higher in patients with OPAT delays: 31 (53%) vs 21 (15%), p<0.001; and $19,576 vs (IQR 10,056-37,038) vs $7,770 (IQR 3,031-13,974), p<0.001. In a multiple variable regression, discharge to a sub-acute care facility was associated with an increased odds of discharge delay while age over 64 years was associated with a decreased odds of discharge delay.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nOPAT with high-priced antibiotics requires significant care coordination. PA delays for these antibiotics are common and contribute to discharge delays. OPAT transitions of care represent an opportunity to improve patient are and address access barriers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz1076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz1076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
背景门诊肠外抗菌药物治疗(OPAT)是一种广泛使用的安全和具有成本效益的治疗策略。大多数公共和私人保险提供商需要OPAT的事先授权(PA),但住院患者PA流程的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在表征与高价OPAT抗生素相关的出院障碍和PA延迟。方法对2017年1月至12月使用高价OPAT抗生素出院的成人患者进行sirb批准的研究。抗生素包括:达托霉素,头孢他林,厄他培南,和新的-内酰胺-内酰胺抑制剂组合。将OPAT PA延迟的患者与未延迟的患者进行比较。主要终点:从治疗开始的直接住院总费用。次要结局:延迟出院,30天再入院或死亡。结果200例患者:无OPAT延迟141例(71%),OPAT延迟59例(30%)。与门诊相比,更多的PA延迟患者出院到亚急性护理机构:37人(63%)对52人(37%),p=0.001。OPAT延迟患者的出院延迟和直接住院总费用中位数较高:31例(53%)vs 21例(15%),p<0.001;$19,576 vs (IQR 10,056-37,038) vs $7,770 (IQR 3,031-13,974), p<0.001。在多变量回归中,出院到亚急性护理机构与出院延迟的几率增加有关,而年龄超过64岁与出院延迟的几率降低有关。结论sopat与高价抗菌药物需加强护理配合。这些抗生素的PA延迟是常见的,并导致出院延迟。OPAT的护理过渡是改善患者状况和解决获取障碍的一个机会。
Discharge Delays and Costs Associated with Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy for High priced Antibiotics.
BACKGROUND
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a widely-used safe and cost-effective treatment strategies. Most public and private insurance providers require prior authorization (PA) for OPAT, yet impact of the inpatient PA process is not known. This study aimed to characterize discharge barriers and PA delays associated with high-priced OPAT antibiotics.
METHODS
IRB-approved study of adult patients discharged with high-priced OPAT antibiotics from January to December 2017. Antibiotics included: daptomycin, ceftaroline, ertapenem, and the novel beta-lactam beta-lactam inhibitor combinations. Patients with an OPAT PA delay were compared to patients without. Primary endpoint: total direct hospital costs from the start of treatment. Secondary outcomes: discharge delay and 30-day readmission or mortality.
RESULTS
Two-hundred patients included: 141 (71%) no OPAT delay vs 59 (30%) OPAT delay. More patients with a PA delay were discharged to a sub-acute care facility compared to an outpatient setting: 37 (63%) vs 52 (37%), p=0.001. Discharge delays and median total direct hospital costs were higher in patients with OPAT delays: 31 (53%) vs 21 (15%), p<0.001; and $19,576 vs (IQR 10,056-37,038) vs $7,770 (IQR 3,031-13,974), p<0.001. In a multiple variable regression, discharge to a sub-acute care facility was associated with an increased odds of discharge delay while age over 64 years was associated with a decreased odds of discharge delay.
CONCLUSIONS
OPAT with high-priced antibiotics requires significant care coordination. PA delays for these antibiotics are common and contribute to discharge delays. OPAT transitions of care represent an opportunity to improve patient are and address access barriers.