早期凯尔特铭文的证据和早期日耳曼语言的读写能力

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
D. Stifter
{"title":"早期凯尔特铭文的证据和早期日耳曼语言的读写能力","authors":"D. Stifter","doi":"10.1075/nowele.00037.sti","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper outlines the individual histories of the attested ancient Celtic epigraphic traditions, Cisalpine Celtic, Celtiberian, Gaulish and Ogam-Irish. It discusses the types of literacy in each of them and presents them as examples of how and under which conditions literacy arose and grew, and finally disappeared, in non-classical languages of antiquity. Where possible, the Celtic languages are viewed against an early Germanic background, to highlight similarities and parallels between the two philological areas, but also to contrast the differences between them and to give an account of where and when opportunities of literate interaction may have arisen between the two groups. These zones of potential interaction, as well as uncommon shapes of letters in some Celtic writing systems, are of relevance for the concluding section where observations from a Celtologist’s point of view will be made that may have a bearing on the origins of Runic writing.","PeriodicalId":41411,"journal":{"name":"NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution","volume":"33 1","pages":"123-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The early Celtic epigraphic evidence and early literacy in Germanic languages\",\"authors\":\"D. Stifter\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/nowele.00037.sti\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper outlines the individual histories of the attested ancient Celtic epigraphic traditions, Cisalpine Celtic, Celtiberian, Gaulish and Ogam-Irish. It discusses the types of literacy in each of them and presents them as examples of how and under which conditions literacy arose and grew, and finally disappeared, in non-classical languages of antiquity. Where possible, the Celtic languages are viewed against an early Germanic background, to highlight similarities and parallels between the two philological areas, but also to contrast the differences between them and to give an account of where and when opportunities of literate interaction may have arisen between the two groups. These zones of potential interaction, as well as uncommon shapes of letters in some Celtic writing systems, are of relevance for the concluding section where observations from a Celtologist’s point of view will be made that may have a bearing on the origins of Runic writing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"123-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00037.sti\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00037.sti","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文概述了已证实的古代凯尔特铭文传统,Cisalpine Celtic, Celtiberian, Gaulish和Ogam-Irish的个体历史。它讨论了每一种语言的读写能力类型,并举例说明了读写能力是如何以及在何种条件下,在古代非古典语言中兴起,发展,最终消失的。在可能的情况下,凯尔特语被看作是早期日耳曼语的背景,以突出两个语言学领域之间的相似之处和相似之处,但也对比它们之间的差异,并说明在哪里和什么时候,两个群体之间可能出现了文化互动的机会。这些潜在的相互作用区域,以及一些凯尔特文字系统中不常见的字母形状,与结语部分有关,在结语部分,将从凯尔特学者的角度进行观察,这可能与符文文字的起源有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The early Celtic epigraphic evidence and early literacy in Germanic languages
Abstract This paper outlines the individual histories of the attested ancient Celtic epigraphic traditions, Cisalpine Celtic, Celtiberian, Gaulish and Ogam-Irish. It discusses the types of literacy in each of them and presents them as examples of how and under which conditions literacy arose and grew, and finally disappeared, in non-classical languages of antiquity. Where possible, the Celtic languages are viewed against an early Germanic background, to highlight similarities and parallels between the two philological areas, but also to contrast the differences between them and to give an account of where and when opportunities of literate interaction may have arisen between the two groups. These zones of potential interaction, as well as uncommon shapes of letters in some Celtic writing systems, are of relevance for the concluding section where observations from a Celtologist’s point of view will be made that may have a bearing on the origins of Runic writing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信