“红伯爵”民事案件

A. Vershinin
{"title":"“红伯爵”民事案件","authors":"A. Vershinin","doi":"10.31857/s102694520024128-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1924, the Leningrad Provincial Court considered the litigation between Alexei Tolstoy and the translator of a foreign play, which formed the basis of the stage work of the writer. In pre-revolutionary and soviet Russia, as well as in some other states, there were social, administrative and legal prerequisites for the free use of foreign works (i.e. reprint, translation, recast). The court dismissed the claim without considering the foreign element of the legal relationship. In the absence of cross-border agreements on copyright, the court decision did not eliminate all the questions about the “casus Tolstoy” not only among literary critics, but also among lawyers as well.","PeriodicalId":82769,"journal":{"name":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The civil case of the “red count”\",\"authors\":\"A. Vershinin\",\"doi\":\"10.31857/s102694520024128-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1924, the Leningrad Provincial Court considered the litigation between Alexei Tolstoy and the translator of a foreign play, which formed the basis of the stage work of the writer. In pre-revolutionary and soviet Russia, as well as in some other states, there were social, administrative and legal prerequisites for the free use of foreign works (i.e. reprint, translation, recast). The court dismissed the claim without considering the foreign element of the legal relationship. In the absence of cross-border agreements on copyright, the court decision did not eliminate all the questions about the “casus Tolstoy” not only among literary critics, but also among lawyers as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520024128-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520024128-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1924年,列宁格勒省法院审理了阿列克谢·托尔斯泰与外国戏剧译者之间的诉讼,这构成了作家舞台作品的基础。在革命前和苏维埃俄国,以及在其他一些国家,自由使用外国作品(即重印、翻译、重铸)有社会、行政和法律上的先决条件。法院没有考虑法律关系中的外国因素就驳回了这一要求。在没有跨境版权协议的情况下,法院的判决并没有消除文学评论家和律师对“托尔斯泰案”的所有质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The civil case of the “red count”
In 1924, the Leningrad Provincial Court considered the litigation between Alexei Tolstoy and the translator of a foreign play, which formed the basis of the stage work of the writer. In pre-revolutionary and soviet Russia, as well as in some other states, there were social, administrative and legal prerequisites for the free use of foreign works (i.e. reprint, translation, recast). The court dismissed the claim without considering the foreign element of the legal relationship. In the absence of cross-border agreements on copyright, the court decision did not eliminate all the questions about the “casus Tolstoy” not only among literary critics, but also among lawyers as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信