652:成年女性BRCA检测及结果的种族/民族差异

F. Guo, E. Fuchs, A. Berenson, Y. Kuo
{"title":"652:成年女性BRCA检测及结果的种族/民族差异","authors":"F. Guo, E. Fuchs, A. Berenson, Y. Kuo","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: BRCA mutation testing has been recommended for targeted, individualized cancer prevention and treatment among women whose family histories or ethnic backgrounds are associated with increased risks for BRCA mutations. This study was to assess BRCA testing in different racial/ethnic groups in the US. Methods: We used data from ClinformaticsTM Data Mart (CDM) Electronic Health Records. We included 134,827 women 18-65 years old with BRCA testing results from 1/1/2015-9/1/2017. BRCA testing rates and test result positive rates were calculated by race/ethnicity. Women with positive test results had a high risk for developing susceptible cancers - breast or ovarian cancer. As we only had data through 9/1/2017, we calculated annual test rates based on data in 2016. Results: The BRCA mutation test rate in 2016 was highest among non-Hispanic Whites (582 per 100,000), while it was 313 per 100,000 in non-Hispanic Black women, 310 per 100,000 in Hispanic Women, and 281 per 100,000 in women of other races/ethnicities. Percentage of positive results was lowest among non-Hispanic White women tested (75.7%), and highest among non-Hispanic Black test takes (85.1%). After adjusting for age, region of residence, education, income, and family history of breast or ovarian cancer, adjusted odds ratio for having a positive test among non-Hispanic Black women tested vs. non-Hispanic White women tested was 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.61-1.82, and adjusted odds ratio for Hispanics vs non-Hispanic Whites was 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.31. Conclusions: There are significant differences in test utilization and test results. Test utilization was highest in non-Hispanic Whites, who were also less likely to have a positive test result. Non-Hispanic Black women tested were more likely to have a positive test result, suggesting a more stringent test selection criteria for this underserved population. Citation Format: Fangjian Guo, Erika L. Fuchs, Abbey B. Berenson, Yong-Fang Kuo. Racial/ethnic differences in BRCA testing and test results among adult women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 652.","PeriodicalId":20357,"journal":{"name":"Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract 652: Racial/ethnic differences in BRCA testing and test results among adult women\",\"authors\":\"F. Guo, E. Fuchs, A. Berenson, Y. Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: BRCA mutation testing has been recommended for targeted, individualized cancer prevention and treatment among women whose family histories or ethnic backgrounds are associated with increased risks for BRCA mutations. This study was to assess BRCA testing in different racial/ethnic groups in the US. Methods: We used data from ClinformaticsTM Data Mart (CDM) Electronic Health Records. We included 134,827 women 18-65 years old with BRCA testing results from 1/1/2015-9/1/2017. BRCA testing rates and test result positive rates were calculated by race/ethnicity. Women with positive test results had a high risk for developing susceptible cancers - breast or ovarian cancer. As we only had data through 9/1/2017, we calculated annual test rates based on data in 2016. Results: The BRCA mutation test rate in 2016 was highest among non-Hispanic Whites (582 per 100,000), while it was 313 per 100,000 in non-Hispanic Black women, 310 per 100,000 in Hispanic Women, and 281 per 100,000 in women of other races/ethnicities. Percentage of positive results was lowest among non-Hispanic White women tested (75.7%), and highest among non-Hispanic Black test takes (85.1%). After adjusting for age, region of residence, education, income, and family history of breast or ovarian cancer, adjusted odds ratio for having a positive test among non-Hispanic Black women tested vs. non-Hispanic White women tested was 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.61-1.82, and adjusted odds ratio for Hispanics vs non-Hispanic Whites was 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.31. Conclusions: There are significant differences in test utilization and test results. Test utilization was highest in non-Hispanic Whites, who were also less likely to have a positive test result. Non-Hispanic Black women tested were more likely to have a positive test result, suggesting a more stringent test selection criteria for this underserved population. Citation Format: Fangjian Guo, Erika L. Fuchs, Abbey B. Berenson, Yong-Fang Kuo. Racial/ethnic differences in BRCA testing and test results among adult women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 652.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:对于家族史或种族背景与BRCA突变风险增加相关的女性,BRCA突变检测被推荐用于有针对性的、个性化的癌症预防和治疗。本研究旨在评估美国不同种族/民族群体的BRCA检测。方法:我们使用来自ClinformaticsTM数据集市(CDM)电子健康记录的数据。我们纳入了134,827名18-65岁的女性,她们在2015年1月1日至2017年9月1日期间进行了BRCA检测。BRCA检测率和检测结果阳性率按人种/民族计算。检测结果呈阳性的女性患易感癌症——乳腺癌或卵巢癌的风险很高。由于我们只有截至2017年9月1日的数据,因此我们根据2016年的数据计算了年度测试率。结果:2016年,非西班牙裔白人的BRCA突变检测率最高(582 / 10万),而非西班牙裔黑人女性为313 / 10万,西班牙裔女性为310 / 10万,其他种族/民族女性为281 / 10万。阳性结果百分比在非西班牙裔白人妇女测试中最低(75.7%),在非西班牙裔黑人测试中最高(85.1%)。在调整年龄、居住地区、教育程度、收入和乳腺癌或卵巢癌家族史后,非西班牙裔黑人女性与非西班牙裔白人女性检测阳性的调整优势比为1.71,95%置信区间为1.61-1.82,西班牙裔与非西班牙裔白人的调整优势比为1.21,95%置信区间为1.13-1.31。结论:两组患者在测试使用率和测试结果上存在显著差异。非西班牙裔白人的测试使用率最高,他们也不太可能有阳性的测试结果。接受测试的非西班牙裔黑人妇女更有可能有阳性的测试结果,这表明对这一服务不足的人群有更严格的测试选择标准。引用格式:郭方建,Erika L. Fuchs, Abbey B. Berenson,郭永芳。成年女性BRCA检测及结果的种族/民族差异[摘要]。摘自:2019年美国癌症研究协会年会论文集;2019年3月29日至4月3日;亚特兰大,乔治亚州。费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(13增刊):652。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abstract 652: Racial/ethnic differences in BRCA testing and test results among adult women
Introduction: BRCA mutation testing has been recommended for targeted, individualized cancer prevention and treatment among women whose family histories or ethnic backgrounds are associated with increased risks for BRCA mutations. This study was to assess BRCA testing in different racial/ethnic groups in the US. Methods: We used data from ClinformaticsTM Data Mart (CDM) Electronic Health Records. We included 134,827 women 18-65 years old with BRCA testing results from 1/1/2015-9/1/2017. BRCA testing rates and test result positive rates were calculated by race/ethnicity. Women with positive test results had a high risk for developing susceptible cancers - breast or ovarian cancer. As we only had data through 9/1/2017, we calculated annual test rates based on data in 2016. Results: The BRCA mutation test rate in 2016 was highest among non-Hispanic Whites (582 per 100,000), while it was 313 per 100,000 in non-Hispanic Black women, 310 per 100,000 in Hispanic Women, and 281 per 100,000 in women of other races/ethnicities. Percentage of positive results was lowest among non-Hispanic White women tested (75.7%), and highest among non-Hispanic Black test takes (85.1%). After adjusting for age, region of residence, education, income, and family history of breast or ovarian cancer, adjusted odds ratio for having a positive test among non-Hispanic Black women tested vs. non-Hispanic White women tested was 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.61-1.82, and adjusted odds ratio for Hispanics vs non-Hispanic Whites was 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.31. Conclusions: There are significant differences in test utilization and test results. Test utilization was highest in non-Hispanic Whites, who were also less likely to have a positive test result. Non-Hispanic Black women tested were more likely to have a positive test result, suggesting a more stringent test selection criteria for this underserved population. Citation Format: Fangjian Guo, Erika L. Fuchs, Abbey B. Berenson, Yong-Fang Kuo. Racial/ethnic differences in BRCA testing and test results among adult women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 652.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信