风险评估和机械安全

H.M.N. Raafat
{"title":"风险评估和机械安全","authors":"H.M.N. Raafat","doi":"10.1016/0376-6349(89)90004-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The rapid development in the field of machine design coupled with the increasing use of fluid power and programmable electronic systems in operating modern machinery has led to an increasing concern for the safety of all personnel involved in machine operation and maintenance.</p><p>In many respects, modern machinery tends to pose unique problems and hazards which might differ in nature from those presented by conventional machinery. The introduction of the British Standard Code of practice BS 5304:1988 for Safety of Machinery will benefit manufacturers from a more uniform application of safeguarding principles. Until the European Community legislation and supporting Standards are available, the Code will be the major document detailing how British machinery safety legislation can be complied with. Although the application of risk assessment to machinery safety was explored briefly in the new British Standard, it has very limited application and rigid requirements for safeguarding are still imposed, mainly as a result of ‘experience’ or past accident statistics. Designers feel ‘justifiably’ severely restricted in their innovation by a set of rigid rules presented by the new Standard as well as the EC Directive on Product Liability. This paper considers the role of probabilistic risk assessment as a modern approach to machinery safety through a case history and proposes a guide for the acceptability of risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 37-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(89)90004-7","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk assessment and machinery safety\",\"authors\":\"H.M.N. Raafat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0376-6349(89)90004-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The rapid development in the field of machine design coupled with the increasing use of fluid power and programmable electronic systems in operating modern machinery has led to an increasing concern for the safety of all personnel involved in machine operation and maintenance.</p><p>In many respects, modern machinery tends to pose unique problems and hazards which might differ in nature from those presented by conventional machinery. The introduction of the British Standard Code of practice BS 5304:1988 for Safety of Machinery will benefit manufacturers from a more uniform application of safeguarding principles. Until the European Community legislation and supporting Standards are available, the Code will be the major document detailing how British machinery safety legislation can be complied with. Although the application of risk assessment to machinery safety was explored briefly in the new British Standard, it has very limited application and rigid requirements for safeguarding are still imposed, mainly as a result of ‘experience’ or past accident statistics. Designers feel ‘justifiably’ severely restricted in their innovation by a set of rigid rules presented by the new Standard as well as the EC Directive on Product Liability. This paper considers the role of probabilistic risk assessment as a modern approach to machinery safety through a case history and proposes a guide for the acceptability of risk.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Accidents\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 37-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(89)90004-7\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Accidents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0376634989900047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0376634989900047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

机械设计领域的快速发展,加上在现代机械操作中越来越多地使用流体动力和可编程电子系统,使得所有参与机器操作和维护的人员的安全越来越受到关注。在许多方面,现代机械往往造成独特的问题和危险,这些问题和危险可能与传统机械所呈现的性质不同。英国机械安全标准规范BS 5304:1988的引入将使制造商受益于更统一的防护原则应用。在欧洲共同体立法和配套标准出台之前,该规范将是详细说明如何遵守英国机械安全立法的主要文件。尽管在新的英国标准中简要探讨了风险评估对机械安全的应用,但它的应用非常有限,并且仍然强加了严格的保护要求,主要是由于“经验”或过去的事故统计。由于新标准和欧盟产品责任指令提出了一系列严格的规则,设计师们感到他们的创新受到了“合理的”限制。本文通过实例分析了概率风险评估作为机械安全的一种现代方法的作用,并提出了风险可接受性的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk assessment and machinery safety

The rapid development in the field of machine design coupled with the increasing use of fluid power and programmable electronic systems in operating modern machinery has led to an increasing concern for the safety of all personnel involved in machine operation and maintenance.

In many respects, modern machinery tends to pose unique problems and hazards which might differ in nature from those presented by conventional machinery. The introduction of the British Standard Code of practice BS 5304:1988 for Safety of Machinery will benefit manufacturers from a more uniform application of safeguarding principles. Until the European Community legislation and supporting Standards are available, the Code will be the major document detailing how British machinery safety legislation can be complied with. Although the application of risk assessment to machinery safety was explored briefly in the new British Standard, it has very limited application and rigid requirements for safeguarding are still imposed, mainly as a result of ‘experience’ or past accident statistics. Designers feel ‘justifiably’ severely restricted in their innovation by a set of rigid rules presented by the new Standard as well as the EC Directive on Product Liability. This paper considers the role of probabilistic risk assessment as a modern approach to machinery safety through a case history and proposes a guide for the acceptability of risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信