在“自动化地理学”与“自动化地理学”之间:辩证思考的三个寓言

IF 2.2 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
K. Attoh, Declan Cullen, Katie J. Wells
{"title":"在“自动化地理学”与“自动化地理学”之间:辩证思考的三个寓言","authors":"K. Attoh, Declan Cullen, Katie J. Wells","doi":"10.1080/13562576.2021.1985855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, we identify what appear to be two separate approaches to questions of automation within the discipline of Geography. One approach, which we call ‘Automated Geography', examines how automation and technological change impact the discipline itself – everything from how we conduct research to how we relate to institutional power. The second approach, which we deem ‘Geographies of Automation', examines automation’s impact on the world that geographers study. We argue that defining Geography in an age of automation requires bringing these approaches together and embracing dialectical thinking. The article draws on three parables to flesh out this dialectical approach.","PeriodicalId":46632,"journal":{"name":"SPACE AND POLITY","volume":"10 1","pages":"167 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between ‘automated geography’ and ‘geographies of automation’: three parables for thinking dialectically\",\"authors\":\"K. Attoh, Declan Cullen, Katie J. Wells\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13562576.2021.1985855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this article, we identify what appear to be two separate approaches to questions of automation within the discipline of Geography. One approach, which we call ‘Automated Geography', examines how automation and technological change impact the discipline itself – everything from how we conduct research to how we relate to institutional power. The second approach, which we deem ‘Geographies of Automation', examines automation’s impact on the world that geographers study. We argue that defining Geography in an age of automation requires bringing these approaches together and embracing dialectical thinking. The article draws on three parables to flesh out this dialectical approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPACE AND POLITY\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"167 - 183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPACE AND POLITY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2021.1985855\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPACE AND POLITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2021.1985855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在本文中,我们确定了似乎是地理学科中自动化问题的两种不同方法。一种方法,我们称之为“自动化地理学”,研究自动化和技术变革如何影响学科本身——从我们如何进行研究到我们如何与制度权力联系起来。第二种方法,我们认为是“自动化地理”,考察了自动化对地理学家研究的世界的影响。我们认为,在自动化时代定义地理学需要将这些方法结合在一起,并采用辩证思维。本文用三个比喻来充实这种辩证的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between ‘automated geography’ and ‘geographies of automation’: three parables for thinking dialectically
ABSTRACT In this article, we identify what appear to be two separate approaches to questions of automation within the discipline of Geography. One approach, which we call ‘Automated Geography', examines how automation and technological change impact the discipline itself – everything from how we conduct research to how we relate to institutional power. The second approach, which we deem ‘Geographies of Automation', examines automation’s impact on the world that geographers study. We argue that defining Geography in an age of automation requires bringing these approaches together and embracing dialectical thinking. The article draws on three parables to flesh out this dialectical approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SPACE AND POLITY
SPACE AND POLITY GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Space & Polity is a fully refereed scholarly international journal devoted to the theoretical and empirical understanding of the changing relationships between the state, and regional and local forms of governance. The journal provides a forum aimed particularly at bringing together social scientists currently working in a variety of disciplines, including geography, political science, sociology, economics, anthropology and development studies and who have a common interest in the relationships between space, place and politics in less developed as well as the advanced economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信