避免投诉:委内瑞拉警察对公民使用武力的情景标准*

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
C. Birkbeck, Luis Gerardo Gabaldón
{"title":"避免投诉:委内瑞拉警察对公民使用武力的情景标准*","authors":"C. Birkbeck, Luis Gerardo Gabaldón","doi":"10.1080/10439463.1996.9964745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Situational justifications for the use of force by the police are constructed in several domains. One type of justification are the tactical rules that officers formulate in order to do their work. Our assumption is that these rules play an important role in guiding police behavior and in shaping officers’ retrospective accounts of how they behaved. The present study examines the content of tactical rules for the use of force among a group of Venezuelan supervisory police officers. We find that the tactical rules differ significantly from the legal‐administrative rules governing the use of force. Tactical rules are oriented by the attempt to avoid external inquiries that represent a continual threat to police occupational stability and prestige. We hypothesize that the use of force is more likely under the following conditions: (a) citizens behave in such a way that force is perceived as necessary to control the encounter; (b) citizens are perceived to be morally disreputable; (c) citizens are perceived t...","PeriodicalId":47763,"journal":{"name":"Policing & Society","volume":"75 1","pages":"113-129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Avoiding complaints: Venezuelan police officers’ situational criteria for the use of force against citizens∗\",\"authors\":\"C. Birkbeck, Luis Gerardo Gabaldón\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10439463.1996.9964745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Situational justifications for the use of force by the police are constructed in several domains. One type of justification are the tactical rules that officers formulate in order to do their work. Our assumption is that these rules play an important role in guiding police behavior and in shaping officers’ retrospective accounts of how they behaved. The present study examines the content of tactical rules for the use of force among a group of Venezuelan supervisory police officers. We find that the tactical rules differ significantly from the legal‐administrative rules governing the use of force. Tactical rules are oriented by the attempt to avoid external inquiries that represent a continual threat to police occupational stability and prestige. We hypothesize that the use of force is more likely under the following conditions: (a) citizens behave in such a way that force is perceived as necessary to control the encounter; (b) citizens are perceived to be morally disreputable; (c) citizens are perceived t...\",\"PeriodicalId\":47763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policing & Society\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"113-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policing & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1996.9964745\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1996.9964745","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

警察使用武力的情境正当性是在几个领域建立起来的。一种理由是警官们为了完成工作而制定的战术规则。我们的假设是,这些规则在指导警察行为和塑造警察对自己行为的回顾性描述方面发挥了重要作用。本研究审查了一组委内瑞拉监督警察使用武力的战术规则的内容。我们发现战术规则与管理武力使用的法律-行政规则有很大不同。战术规则的目的是避免外部调查,因为外部调查对警察职业的稳定和威望构成持续威胁。我们假设在以下情况下更有可能使用武力:(a)公民的行为方式使武力被认为是控制冲突所必需的;(b)公民被认为道德败坏;(c)公民被认为……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Avoiding complaints: Venezuelan police officers’ situational criteria for the use of force against citizens∗
Situational justifications for the use of force by the police are constructed in several domains. One type of justification are the tactical rules that officers formulate in order to do their work. Our assumption is that these rules play an important role in guiding police behavior and in shaping officers’ retrospective accounts of how they behaved. The present study examines the content of tactical rules for the use of force among a group of Venezuelan supervisory police officers. We find that the tactical rules differ significantly from the legal‐administrative rules governing the use of force. Tactical rules are oriented by the attempt to avoid external inquiries that represent a continual threat to police occupational stability and prestige. We hypothesize that the use of force is more likely under the following conditions: (a) citizens behave in such a way that force is perceived as necessary to control the encounter; (b) citizens are perceived to be morally disreputable; (c) citizens are perceived t...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policing & Society
Policing & Society CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Policing & Society is widely acknowledged as the leading international academic journal specialising in the study of policing institutions and their practices. It is concerned with all aspects of how policing articulates and animates the social contexts in which it is located. This includes: • Social scientific investigations of police policy and activity • Legal and political analyses of police powers and governance • Management oriented research on aspects of police organisation Space is also devoted to the relationship between what the police do and the policing decisions and functions of communities, private sector organisations and other state agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信