跨文化交际:南方对未来的看法:文化、恐怖主义和精神

Q1 Social Sciences
K. Tomaselli
{"title":"跨文化交际:南方对未来的看法:文化、恐怖主义和精神","authors":"K. Tomaselli","doi":"10.1080/23808985.2019.1595696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT An historical overview of different intercultural communication (IC) paradigms explains how they have been used and misused in different societal contexts. Dissimilar paradigms account for only part of the picture, in that they largely ignore non-material dimensions of life, religion and the immaterial. A case study explains how early theories and methods had been re-articulated in South Africa to legitmize the opposite of the field’s intentions – racial separation rather than intercultural understanding. A brief and eclectic tour of how IC has been adopted and adapted in other national contexts is offered. IC is briefly also examined in how it has been very differently elaborated and elevated through drawing on Jacques Derrida and British cultural studies to address global issues in China.","PeriodicalId":36859,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the International Communication Association","volume":"35 1","pages":"19 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intercultural communication: a southern view on the way ahead: culture, terrorism and spirituality\",\"authors\":\"K. Tomaselli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23808985.2019.1595696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT An historical overview of different intercultural communication (IC) paradigms explains how they have been used and misused in different societal contexts. Dissimilar paradigms account for only part of the picture, in that they largely ignore non-material dimensions of life, religion and the immaterial. A case study explains how early theories and methods had been re-articulated in South Africa to legitmize the opposite of the field’s intentions – racial separation rather than intercultural understanding. A brief and eclectic tour of how IC has been adopted and adapted in other national contexts is offered. IC is briefly also examined in how it has been very differently elaborated and elevated through drawing on Jacques Derrida and British cultural studies to address global issues in China.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the International Communication Association\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"19 - 33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the International Communication Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1595696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the International Communication Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1595696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:本文对不同的跨文化交际范式进行了历史回顾,解释了它们在不同的社会背景下是如何被使用和误用的。不同的范式只能说明部分情况,因为它们在很大程度上忽略了生活、宗教和非物质的非物质层面。一个案例研究解释了早期的理论和方法如何在南非被重新表述,从而使该领域的意图——种族隔离而不是跨文化理解——的对立面合法化。简要而兼收并蓄地介绍了如何在其他国家背景下采用和调整综合信息系统。本文还简要地考察了通过借鉴雅克·德里达和英国文化研究来解决中国的全球问题,IC是如何得到非常不同的阐述和提升的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intercultural communication: a southern view on the way ahead: culture, terrorism and spirituality
ABSTRACT An historical overview of different intercultural communication (IC) paradigms explains how they have been used and misused in different societal contexts. Dissimilar paradigms account for only part of the picture, in that they largely ignore non-material dimensions of life, religion and the immaterial. A case study explains how early theories and methods had been re-articulated in South Africa to legitmize the opposite of the field’s intentions – racial separation rather than intercultural understanding. A brief and eclectic tour of how IC has been adopted and adapted in other national contexts is offered. IC is briefly also examined in how it has been very differently elaborated and elevated through drawing on Jacques Derrida and British cultural studies to address global issues in China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信