基于多通道流下限的最优逼近Max-Cut

Lijie Chen, Gillat Kol, Dmitry Paramonov, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Zhao Song, Huacheng Yu
{"title":"基于多通道流下限的最优逼近Max-Cut","authors":"Lijie Chen, Gillat Kol, Dmitry Paramonov, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Zhao Song, Huacheng Yu","doi":"10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the Max-Cut problem, asking how much space is needed by a streaming algorithm in order to estimate the value of the maximum cut in a graph. This problem has been extensively studied over the last decade, and we now have a near-optimal lower bound for one-pass streaming algorithms, showing that they require linear space to guarantee a better-than-2 approximation [KKS15, KK19]. This result relies on a lower bound for the cycle-finding problem, showing that it is hard for a one-pass streaming algorithm to find a cycle in a union of matchings. The end-goal of our research is to prove a similar lower bound for multi-pass streaming algorithms that guarantee a better-than-2 approximation for Max-Cut, a highly challenging open problem. In this paper, we take a significant step in this direction, showing that even o(log n)-pass streaming algorithms need nΩ(1) space to solve the cycle-finding problem. Our proof is quite involved, dividing the cycles in the graph into “short” and “long” cycles, and using tailor-made lower bound techniques to handle each case. ∗UC Berkeley. †Princeton University. ‡Princeton University. §Microsoft Research. ¶Adobe Research. ‖Princeton University. ISSN 1433-8092 Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, Report No. 161 (2022)","PeriodicalId":11639,"journal":{"name":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","volume":"276 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Multi-Pass Streaming Lower Bounds for Optimal Approximation of Max-Cut\",\"authors\":\"Lijie Chen, Gillat Kol, Dmitry Paramonov, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Zhao Song, Huacheng Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider the Max-Cut problem, asking how much space is needed by a streaming algorithm in order to estimate the value of the maximum cut in a graph. This problem has been extensively studied over the last decade, and we now have a near-optimal lower bound for one-pass streaming algorithms, showing that they require linear space to guarantee a better-than-2 approximation [KKS15, KK19]. This result relies on a lower bound for the cycle-finding problem, showing that it is hard for a one-pass streaming algorithm to find a cycle in a union of matchings. The end-goal of our research is to prove a similar lower bound for multi-pass streaming algorithms that guarantee a better-than-2 approximation for Max-Cut, a highly challenging open problem. In this paper, we take a significant step in this direction, showing that even o(log n)-pass streaming algorithms need nΩ(1) space to solve the cycle-finding problem. Our proof is quite involved, dividing the cycles in the graph into “short” and “long” cycles, and using tailor-made lower bound techniques to handle each case. ∗UC Berkeley. †Princeton University. ‡Princeton University. §Microsoft Research. ¶Adobe Research. ‖Princeton University. ISSN 1433-8092 Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, Report No. 161 (2022)\",\"PeriodicalId\":11639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.\",\"volume\":\"276 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

我们考虑最大切割问题,询问流算法需要多少空间才能估计图中最大切割的值。在过去的十年中,这个问题得到了广泛的研究,我们现在有了单次流算法的近最优下界,表明它们需要线性空间来保证优于2的近似[KKS15, KK19]。该结果依赖于循环查找问题的下界,表明单遍流算法很难在匹配的并集中找到循环。我们研究的最终目标是证明多通道流算法的类似下界,以保证Max-Cut的近似优于2,这是一个非常具有挑战性的开放问题。在本文中,我们在这个方向上迈出了重要的一步,表明即使o(log n)次流算法也需要nΩ(1)空间来解决寻环问题。我们的证明相当复杂,将图中的周期划分为“短”和“长”周期,并使用定制的下界技术来处理每种情况。∗加州大学伯克利分校。__普林斯顿大学。‡普林斯顿大学。§微软研究院。¶Adobe的研究。为普林斯顿大学。计算复杂性电子学术讨论会,报告No. 161 (2022)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards Multi-Pass Streaming Lower Bounds for Optimal Approximation of Max-Cut
We consider the Max-Cut problem, asking how much space is needed by a streaming algorithm in order to estimate the value of the maximum cut in a graph. This problem has been extensively studied over the last decade, and we now have a near-optimal lower bound for one-pass streaming algorithms, showing that they require linear space to guarantee a better-than-2 approximation [KKS15, KK19]. This result relies on a lower bound for the cycle-finding problem, showing that it is hard for a one-pass streaming algorithm to find a cycle in a union of matchings. The end-goal of our research is to prove a similar lower bound for multi-pass streaming algorithms that guarantee a better-than-2 approximation for Max-Cut, a highly challenging open problem. In this paper, we take a significant step in this direction, showing that even o(log n)-pass streaming algorithms need nΩ(1) space to solve the cycle-finding problem. Our proof is quite involved, dividing the cycles in the graph into “short” and “long” cycles, and using tailor-made lower bound techniques to handle each case. ∗UC Berkeley. †Princeton University. ‡Princeton University. §Microsoft Research. ¶Adobe Research. ‖Princeton University. ISSN 1433-8092 Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, Report No. 161 (2022)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信