腰坐骨浸润对椎间盘突出和腰背动脉粥样硬化的发展有何影响?

K. Ndiaye, Adamou Abbassi, Mbang Dono Djerabe, S. Traore, A. Bonté, Madjouma A. B. Doumbia, Félicien G. Toudjingar, Yannick CANTON. Kessely
{"title":"腰坐骨浸润对椎间盘突出和腰背动脉粥样硬化的发展有何影响?","authors":"K. Ndiaye, Adamou Abbassi, Mbang Dono Djerabe, S. Traore, A. Bonté, Madjouma A. B. Doumbia, Félicien G. Toudjingar, Yannick CANTON. Kessely","doi":"10.4236/WJNS.2021.112012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lumbosciatica is a frequent reason for consultation in general medicine \nand emergency medicine with an estimated incidence between 2% and 14%. There \nare several therapeutic modalities, including infiltrations, which are very \ncontroversial. Based on this observation, we conducted a prospective study in \nwhich 19 patients had undergone epidural and peri-radicular infiltration; the \nepidural was the most represented infiltration in 68.4% of the patients, the \nperi-radicular was in 21.1% of them and the combination of both was in 10.5% of \nthe cases, with only 30.6% of the infiltrations carried out under radioscopy. \nThe molecules used were Triamcinolone Acetonide-based Kenacort and \nMethylprednisolone Acetate-based Depo-Medrol. The evolution of \npost-infiltration pain decreased significantly in 94.7% of cases, with a \nstatistically significant difference (p = 0.04). No complications were observed \nin our patients and none of them had resorted to surgery during the follow-up \nperiod except for a single case of recurrence of pain relieved by periodic \nspaced infiltrations. Despite the small size of our sample, we can conclude \nthat infiltration techniques still have a place in the management of \nLumbosciatica alongside the surgery.","PeriodicalId":23878,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the Impact of Lumbosciatic Infiltration on the Evolution of Herniated Disc and Dorsolumbar Asthrosis?\",\"authors\":\"K. Ndiaye, Adamou Abbassi, Mbang Dono Djerabe, S. Traore, A. Bonté, Madjouma A. B. Doumbia, Félicien G. Toudjingar, Yannick CANTON. Kessely\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/WJNS.2021.112012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lumbosciatica is a frequent reason for consultation in general medicine \\nand emergency medicine with an estimated incidence between 2% and 14%. There \\nare several therapeutic modalities, including infiltrations, which are very \\ncontroversial. Based on this observation, we conducted a prospective study in \\nwhich 19 patients had undergone epidural and peri-radicular infiltration; the \\nepidural was the most represented infiltration in 68.4% of the patients, the \\nperi-radicular was in 21.1% of them and the combination of both was in 10.5% of \\nthe cases, with only 30.6% of the infiltrations carried out under radioscopy. \\nThe molecules used were Triamcinolone Acetonide-based Kenacort and \\nMethylprednisolone Acetate-based Depo-Medrol. The evolution of \\npost-infiltration pain decreased significantly in 94.7% of cases, with a \\nstatistically significant difference (p = 0.04). No complications were observed \\nin our patients and none of them had resorted to surgery during the follow-up \\nperiod except for a single case of recurrence of pain relieved by periodic \\nspaced infiltrations. Despite the small size of our sample, we can conclude \\nthat infiltration techniques still have a place in the management of \\nLumbosciatica alongside the surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/WJNS.2021.112012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/WJNS.2021.112012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腰坐骨神经痛是普通医学和急诊医学就诊的常见原因,估计发病率在2%至14%之间。有几种治疗方式,包括浸润,这是非常有争议的。基于这一观察,我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,其中19例患者接受了硬膜外和神经根周围浸润;硬膜外浸润占68.4%,神经根周围浸润占21.1%,两者合并浸润占10.5%,在x线镜下浸润仅占30.6%。使用的分子是基于曲安奈德的肯纳科特和基于醋酸甲泼尼龙的Depo-Medrol。94.7%的患者浸润后疼痛的演变程度明显降低,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。随访期间,所有患者均未出现并发症,除一例疼痛复发,经周期性间隙浸润缓解外,均未采取手术治疗。尽管我们的样本很小,但我们可以得出结论,浸润技术在手术治疗腰坐骨神经痛中仍然占有一席之地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is the Impact of Lumbosciatic Infiltration on the Evolution of Herniated Disc and Dorsolumbar Asthrosis?
Lumbosciatica is a frequent reason for consultation in general medicine and emergency medicine with an estimated incidence between 2% and 14%. There are several therapeutic modalities, including infiltrations, which are very controversial. Based on this observation, we conducted a prospective study in which 19 patients had undergone epidural and peri-radicular infiltration; the epidural was the most represented infiltration in 68.4% of the patients, the peri-radicular was in 21.1% of them and the combination of both was in 10.5% of the cases, with only 30.6% of the infiltrations carried out under radioscopy. The molecules used were Triamcinolone Acetonide-based Kenacort and Methylprednisolone Acetate-based Depo-Medrol. The evolution of post-infiltration pain decreased significantly in 94.7% of cases, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.04). No complications were observed in our patients and none of them had resorted to surgery during the follow-up period except for a single case of recurrence of pain relieved by periodic spaced infiltrations. Despite the small size of our sample, we can conclude that infiltration techniques still have a place in the management of Lumbosciatica alongside the surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信