Muhammad Fawwaz Muhammad Yusoff, Nur Izah AB Razak
{"title":"伊本的al-Qānūn f ā al-Ṭibb和al- dhahab的al-Ṭibb al- nabawi中的中世纪医学理论原则","authors":"Muhammad Fawwaz Muhammad Yusoff, Nur Izah AB Razak","doi":"10.22452/afkar.vol22no2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Galenic account of medicine by Ibn Sīnā (d. 427AH/1037CE) was remarkably significant for natural philosophy and religious thought in the medieval Islamic world. Just as one might split philosophy in the Islamic world into eras before and after Avicenna, so one could periodise medical history into the time before and after Ibn Sīnā’s glorious al-Qānūn fī al-Ṭibb (Canon of Medicine). This article compares the medical theory in al-Qānūn fī al-Ṭibb and al-Dhahabī’s (d. 748/1348) al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī to determine if the medieval al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī genre was influenced by the post-Avicennian tradition. To assess this theoretical impact on the writing in the prophetic medicine genre, the article first analyses the introductory part of both writings, as well as the subsequent developments in al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī writings. This will form a comparative view of the medieval anatomical and philosophical positions. Given that traditional prophetic medicine is the focus of the al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī genre, the article turns to the question of medical theory, did al-Dhahabī really observe this topic? What role does medical ḥadīth play in determining how Muslims should approach classical theories of medicine? By comparing these two works, one can see that al-Dhahabī’s al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī developed in interaction with and extension of the al-Qānūn fī al-Ṭibb, as well as an attempt to bring forth a new form of medicine, that would integrate Ibn Sīnā’s medical theory with Prophetic ḥadīth.","PeriodicalId":53770,"journal":{"name":"Afkar-Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam-Journal of Aqidah & Islamic Thought","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medieval Theoretical Principles of Medicine in Ibn Sīnā’s al-Qānūn fī al-Ṭibb and al-Dhahabī’s al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Fawwaz Muhammad Yusoff, Nur Izah AB Razak\",\"doi\":\"10.22452/afkar.vol22no2.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Galenic account of medicine by Ibn Sīnā (d. 427AH/1037CE) was remarkably significant for natural philosophy and religious thought in the medieval Islamic world. Just as one might split philosophy in the Islamic world into eras before and after Avicenna, so one could periodise medical history into the time before and after Ibn Sīnā’s glorious al-Qānūn fī al-Ṭibb (Canon of Medicine). This article compares the medical theory in al-Qānūn fī al-Ṭibb and al-Dhahabī’s (d. 748/1348) al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī to determine if the medieval al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī genre was influenced by the post-Avicennian tradition. To assess this theoretical impact on the writing in the prophetic medicine genre, the article first analyses the introductory part of both writings, as well as the subsequent developments in al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī writings. This will form a comparative view of the medieval anatomical and philosophical positions. Given that traditional prophetic medicine is the focus of the al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī genre, the article turns to the question of medical theory, did al-Dhahabī really observe this topic? What role does medical ḥadīth play in determining how Muslims should approach classical theories of medicine? By comparing these two works, one can see that al-Dhahabī’s al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī developed in interaction with and extension of the al-Qānūn fī al-Ṭibb, as well as an attempt to bring forth a new form of medicine, that would integrate Ibn Sīnā’s medical theory with Prophetic ḥadīth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Afkar-Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam-Journal of Aqidah & Islamic Thought\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Afkar-Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam-Journal of Aqidah & Islamic Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol22no2.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Afkar-Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam-Journal of Aqidah & Islamic Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol22no2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
伊本·桑努伊(公元427年/公元1037年)对盖伦医学的描述对中世纪伊斯兰世界的自然哲学和宗教思想有着显著的意义。正如人们可以将伊斯兰世界的哲学划分为阿维森纳会议之前和之后的时代一样,人们也可以将医学史划分为伊本·斯拉努瓦(Ibn sj ā nā)的辉煌著作al-Qānūn fal -Ṭibb(医典)之前和之后的时代。本文比较了al-Qānūn f æ al-Ṭibb和al- dhahab ' s (d. 748/1348) al-Ṭibb al- nabawyi的医学理论,以确定中世纪的al-Ṭibb al- nabawyi流派是否受到后阿维森纳传统的影响。为了评估这一理论对预言医学流派写作的影响,本文首先分析了这两篇著作的引言部分,以及al-Ṭibb al- nabawi著作的后续发展。这将形成中世纪解剖学和哲学立场的比较观点。鉴于传统的预言医学是al-Ṭibb al- nabawi流派的焦点,文章转向医学理论的问题,al- dhahab真的观察到这个主题吗?医学ḥadīth在决定穆斯林应该如何处理经典医学理论方面扮演什么角色?通过比较这两部作品,我们可以看到al- dhahab ' s al-Ṭibb al- nabawi ' s在与al-Qānūn f ' al ' -Ṭibb的互动和扩展中发展起来,同时也试图提出一种新的医学形式,将伊本·萨纳伊的医学理论与先知ḥadīth结合起来。
Medieval Theoretical Principles of Medicine in Ibn Sīnā’s al-Qānūn fī al-Ṭibb and al-Dhahabī’s al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī
The Galenic account of medicine by Ibn Sīnā (d. 427AH/1037CE) was remarkably significant for natural philosophy and religious thought in the medieval Islamic world. Just as one might split philosophy in the Islamic world into eras before and after Avicenna, so one could periodise medical history into the time before and after Ibn Sīnā’s glorious al-Qānūn fī al-Ṭibb (Canon of Medicine). This article compares the medical theory in al-Qānūn fī al-Ṭibb and al-Dhahabī’s (d. 748/1348) al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī to determine if the medieval al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī genre was influenced by the post-Avicennian tradition. To assess this theoretical impact on the writing in the prophetic medicine genre, the article first analyses the introductory part of both writings, as well as the subsequent developments in al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī writings. This will form a comparative view of the medieval anatomical and philosophical positions. Given that traditional prophetic medicine is the focus of the al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī genre, the article turns to the question of medical theory, did al-Dhahabī really observe this topic? What role does medical ḥadīth play in determining how Muslims should approach classical theories of medicine? By comparing these two works, one can see that al-Dhahabī’s al-Ṭibb al-Nabawī developed in interaction with and extension of the al-Qānūn fī al-Ṭibb, as well as an attempt to bring forth a new form of medicine, that would integrate Ibn Sīnā’s medical theory with Prophetic ḥadīth.