生死在册:作为神圣遗迹的“暴行档案

Q2 Arts and Humanities
R. Whiting
{"title":"生死在册:作为神圣遗迹的“暴行档案","authors":"R. Whiting","doi":"10.1386/jciaw_00077_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the ethical issues surrounding conducting research in archives that include records of atrocities, taking Bath Party and Islamic State records that were de-territorialized from Iraq between 1991 and 2016 as case studies. I argue for the need to further consider\n whether historical subjects are being granted a voice in how their stories are being told. I will discuss the dichotomy between the imperatives to expose human rights abuses and seek accountability, against the need to consider the power dynamics defining control of the post-mortem narratives\n of the individuals named within records. I advocate for an approach to academic research that takes into account the affective power of records and the relations created by engaging them. I will explore how we might approach official records that document the abuse people have suffered as\n extensions of their physical bodies, as sacred remains.","PeriodicalId":36575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Iraq and the Arab World","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Living and dying on record: ‘Atrocity archives’ as sacred remains1\",\"authors\":\"R. Whiting\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/jciaw_00077_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers the ethical issues surrounding conducting research in archives that include records of atrocities, taking Bath Party and Islamic State records that were de-territorialized from Iraq between 1991 and 2016 as case studies. I argue for the need to further consider\\n whether historical subjects are being granted a voice in how their stories are being told. I will discuss the dichotomy between the imperatives to expose human rights abuses and seek accountability, against the need to consider the power dynamics defining control of the post-mortem narratives\\n of the individuals named within records. I advocate for an approach to academic research that takes into account the affective power of records and the relations created by engaging them. I will explore how we might approach official records that document the abuse people have suffered as\\n extensions of their physical bodies, as sacred remains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Iraq and the Arab World\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Iraq and the Arab World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/jciaw_00077_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Iraq and the Arab World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jciaw_00077_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以1991年至2016年从伊拉克非领土化的巴斯党(Bath Party)和伊斯兰国(Islamic State)的记录为例,考虑了在包括暴行记录在内的档案中进行研究的伦理问题。我认为有必要进一步考虑历史主体是否被赋予了在讲述其故事的方式上的发言权。我将讨论揭露侵犯人权行为和寻求问责的必要性与考虑对记录中提到的个人的死后叙述进行控制的权力动态的必要性之间的二分法。我提倡一种学术研究方法,考虑到记录的情感力量以及通过参与记录而建立的关系。我将探讨我们如何处理官方记录,这些记录将人们遭受的虐待作为他们身体的延伸,作为神圣的遗骸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Living and dying on record: ‘Atrocity archives’ as sacred remains1
This article considers the ethical issues surrounding conducting research in archives that include records of atrocities, taking Bath Party and Islamic State records that were de-territorialized from Iraq between 1991 and 2016 as case studies. I argue for the need to further consider whether historical subjects are being granted a voice in how their stories are being told. I will discuss the dichotomy between the imperatives to expose human rights abuses and seek accountability, against the need to consider the power dynamics defining control of the post-mortem narratives of the individuals named within records. I advocate for an approach to academic research that takes into account the affective power of records and the relations created by engaging them. I will explore how we might approach official records that document the abuse people have suffered as extensions of their physical bodies, as sacred remains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Iraq and the Arab World
Journal of Contemporary Iraq and the Arab World Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信