古代定义半音的数学方法

IF 0.5 2区 数学 Q4 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Caleb Mutch
{"title":"古代定义半音的数学方法","authors":"Caleb Mutch","doi":"10.1080/17459737.2020.1753122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Connections between mathematics and music have been recognized since the days of Ancient Greece. The Pythagoreans' association of musical intervals with integer ratios is so well known that it occludes the great variety of approaches to the music-mathematical relationship in Ancient Greece and Rome. The present article uncovers this diversity by examining how authors from Antiquity used one mathematical element – the number series 16, 17, 18 – to serve different ends. The number 17 provides the simplest way to divide the 9:8 whole tone into two parts, but the status of those two parts was debated, as was their relationship to the standard 256:243 semitone of Greek theory. I account for this diversity by appealing to the contexts in which the authors wrote – music treatises vs. commentaries on Plato's Timaeus – and to the importance placed on mathematics in Neoplatonist curricula. The article concludes by examining how confusion regarding the 16, 17, 18 series lingered even in the medieval period due to ambiguities in Boethius's De institutione musica, and how medieval authors eventually superseded the debate through a Euclid-inspired geometric division of the 9:8 ratio.","PeriodicalId":50138,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics and Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematical approaches to defining the semitone in antiquity\",\"authors\":\"Caleb Mutch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17459737.2020.1753122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Connections between mathematics and music have been recognized since the days of Ancient Greece. The Pythagoreans' association of musical intervals with integer ratios is so well known that it occludes the great variety of approaches to the music-mathematical relationship in Ancient Greece and Rome. The present article uncovers this diversity by examining how authors from Antiquity used one mathematical element – the number series 16, 17, 18 – to serve different ends. The number 17 provides the simplest way to divide the 9:8 whole tone into two parts, but the status of those two parts was debated, as was their relationship to the standard 256:243 semitone of Greek theory. I account for this diversity by appealing to the contexts in which the authors wrote – music treatises vs. commentaries on Plato's Timaeus – and to the importance placed on mathematics in Neoplatonist curricula. The article concludes by examining how confusion regarding the 16, 17, 18 series lingered even in the medieval period due to ambiguities in Boethius's De institutione musica, and how medieval authors eventually superseded the debate through a Euclid-inspired geometric division of the 9:8 ratio.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mathematics and Music\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mathematics and Music\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459737.2020.1753122\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics and Music","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459737.2020.1753122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数学和音乐之间的联系早在古希腊时代就已被认识到。毕达哥拉斯学派将音程与整数比联系在一起的观点是如此广为人知,以至于它掩盖了古希腊和罗马研究音乐与数学关系的各种方法。本文通过研究古代作者如何使用一个数学元素——数字系列16,17,18——来达到不同的目的,揭示了这种多样性。数字17提供了将9:8全音分成两部分的最简单方法,但这两部分的地位存在争议,就像它们与希腊理论中标准的256:243半音的关系一样。为了解释这种差异,我诉诸于作者写作的背景——音乐专著与柏拉图《蒂迈欧》的评论——以及数学在新柏拉图主义课程中的重要性。文章的结论是,由于波伊提乌的《音乐制度》(De institutione musica)中的模糊性,即使在中世纪时期,关于16,17,18系列的困惑是如何挥之不去的,以及中世纪作者如何最终通过欧几里得启发的9:8比例几何划分取代了这场辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mathematical approaches to defining the semitone in antiquity
Connections between mathematics and music have been recognized since the days of Ancient Greece. The Pythagoreans' association of musical intervals with integer ratios is so well known that it occludes the great variety of approaches to the music-mathematical relationship in Ancient Greece and Rome. The present article uncovers this diversity by examining how authors from Antiquity used one mathematical element – the number series 16, 17, 18 – to serve different ends. The number 17 provides the simplest way to divide the 9:8 whole tone into two parts, but the status of those two parts was debated, as was their relationship to the standard 256:243 semitone of Greek theory. I account for this diversity by appealing to the contexts in which the authors wrote – music treatises vs. commentaries on Plato's Timaeus – and to the importance placed on mathematics in Neoplatonist curricula. The article concludes by examining how confusion regarding the 16, 17, 18 series lingered even in the medieval period due to ambiguities in Boethius's De institutione musica, and how medieval authors eventually superseded the debate through a Euclid-inspired geometric division of the 9:8 ratio.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematics and Music
Journal of Mathematics and Music 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Mathematics and Music aims to advance the use of mathematical modelling and computation in music theory. The Journal focuses on mathematical approaches to musical structures and processes, including mathematical investigations into music-theoretic or compositional issues as well as mathematically motivated analyses of musical works or performances. In consideration of the deep unsolved ontological and epistemological questions concerning knowledge about music, the Journal is open to a broad array of methodologies and topics, particularly those outside of established research fields such as acoustics, sound engineering, auditory perception, linguistics etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信