{"title":"古代定义半音的数学方法","authors":"Caleb Mutch","doi":"10.1080/17459737.2020.1753122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Connections between mathematics and music have been recognized since the days of Ancient Greece. The Pythagoreans' association of musical intervals with integer ratios is so well known that it occludes the great variety of approaches to the music-mathematical relationship in Ancient Greece and Rome. The present article uncovers this diversity by examining how authors from Antiquity used one mathematical element – the number series 16, 17, 18 – to serve different ends. The number 17 provides the simplest way to divide the 9:8 whole tone into two parts, but the status of those two parts was debated, as was their relationship to the standard 256:243 semitone of Greek theory. I account for this diversity by appealing to the contexts in which the authors wrote – music treatises vs. commentaries on Plato's Timaeus – and to the importance placed on mathematics in Neoplatonist curricula. The article concludes by examining how confusion regarding the 16, 17, 18 series lingered even in the medieval period due to ambiguities in Boethius's De institutione musica, and how medieval authors eventually superseded the debate through a Euclid-inspired geometric division of the 9:8 ratio.","PeriodicalId":50138,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics and Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematical approaches to defining the semitone in antiquity\",\"authors\":\"Caleb Mutch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17459737.2020.1753122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Connections between mathematics and music have been recognized since the days of Ancient Greece. The Pythagoreans' association of musical intervals with integer ratios is so well known that it occludes the great variety of approaches to the music-mathematical relationship in Ancient Greece and Rome. The present article uncovers this diversity by examining how authors from Antiquity used one mathematical element – the number series 16, 17, 18 – to serve different ends. The number 17 provides the simplest way to divide the 9:8 whole tone into two parts, but the status of those two parts was debated, as was their relationship to the standard 256:243 semitone of Greek theory. I account for this diversity by appealing to the contexts in which the authors wrote – music treatises vs. commentaries on Plato's Timaeus – and to the importance placed on mathematics in Neoplatonist curricula. The article concludes by examining how confusion regarding the 16, 17, 18 series lingered even in the medieval period due to ambiguities in Boethius's De institutione musica, and how medieval authors eventually superseded the debate through a Euclid-inspired geometric division of the 9:8 ratio.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mathematics and Music\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mathematics and Music\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459737.2020.1753122\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics and Music","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459737.2020.1753122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mathematical approaches to defining the semitone in antiquity
Connections between mathematics and music have been recognized since the days of Ancient Greece. The Pythagoreans' association of musical intervals with integer ratios is so well known that it occludes the great variety of approaches to the music-mathematical relationship in Ancient Greece and Rome. The present article uncovers this diversity by examining how authors from Antiquity used one mathematical element – the number series 16, 17, 18 – to serve different ends. The number 17 provides the simplest way to divide the 9:8 whole tone into two parts, but the status of those two parts was debated, as was their relationship to the standard 256:243 semitone of Greek theory. I account for this diversity by appealing to the contexts in which the authors wrote – music treatises vs. commentaries on Plato's Timaeus – and to the importance placed on mathematics in Neoplatonist curricula. The article concludes by examining how confusion regarding the 16, 17, 18 series lingered even in the medieval period due to ambiguities in Boethius's De institutione musica, and how medieval authors eventually superseded the debate through a Euclid-inspired geometric division of the 9:8 ratio.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Mathematics and Music aims to advance the use of mathematical modelling and computation in music theory. The Journal focuses on mathematical approaches to musical structures and processes, including mathematical investigations into music-theoretic or compositional issues as well as mathematically motivated analyses of musical works or performances. In consideration of the deep unsolved ontological and epistemological questions concerning knowledge about music, the Journal is open to a broad array of methodologies and topics, particularly those outside of established research fields such as acoustics, sound engineering, auditory perception, linguistics etc.