三级护理患者支气管肺泡灌洗液的细菌病原学及分离菌的抗生素谱

S. Adhikari, Ramesh Sharma Regmi, Siddanta Pandey, Paras Paudel, Nischal Neupane, Shyam Chalise, A. Dubey, Sarad Chandra Kafle, K. Rijal
{"title":"三级护理患者支气管肺泡灌洗液的细菌病原学及分离菌的抗生素谱","authors":"S. Adhikari, Ramesh Sharma Regmi, Siddanta Pandey, Paras Paudel, Nischal Neupane, Shyam Chalise, A. Dubey, Sarad Chandra Kafle, K. Rijal","doi":"10.3126/jist.v26i1.37833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) is a medical technique by which cells and fluids from bronchioles and lung alveoli are withdrawn for diagnosis of disease or evaluation of treatment. Patients with various pulmonary infections follow the procedure of BAL for the disease diagnosis as it has high sensitivity and reliability in diagnosis. To examine the bacterial etiology of BAL fluids among tertiary care patients with pulmonary infections, a cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of three months from August to November 2018. A total of 149 BAL fluid samples were examined and the bacterial agents were isolated and identified by conventional microbiological methods. Out of the 149 samples, 142 samples were culture positive. Among 6 different isolates (4 Gram-negative and 2 Gram-positive), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (45 %) was predominant followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.3 %). A higher infection rate was seen among males (62.4 %) and in the age group 60-70 years (30.0 %). In addition, 25.4 % (36/149) samples were positive in Acid Fast staining. Bacterial recovery from the BAL fluid was significantly associated with the gender and age of the patients (p<0.05). Gentamycin was the least resisted (1.5 %) by Gram-negative isolates followed by Polymyxin-B (3 %). For Gram-positive isolates, Ofloxacin was the most effective drug resisted by none of the isolates followed by Gentamycin. Among the 157 isolates, 125 (79.6 %) were MDR and 35.0 % of Enterobacteriaceae were ESBL producers. Detection of bacterial agents from BAL fluid can be a basis for successful antimicrobial therapy for patients with pulmonary infections.","PeriodicalId":16072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hunan Institute of Science and Technology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial Etiology of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Tertiary Care Patients and Antibiogram of the Isolates\",\"authors\":\"S. Adhikari, Ramesh Sharma Regmi, Siddanta Pandey, Paras Paudel, Nischal Neupane, Shyam Chalise, A. Dubey, Sarad Chandra Kafle, K. Rijal\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/jist.v26i1.37833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) is a medical technique by which cells and fluids from bronchioles and lung alveoli are withdrawn for diagnosis of disease or evaluation of treatment. Patients with various pulmonary infections follow the procedure of BAL for the disease diagnosis as it has high sensitivity and reliability in diagnosis. To examine the bacterial etiology of BAL fluids among tertiary care patients with pulmonary infections, a cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of three months from August to November 2018. A total of 149 BAL fluid samples were examined and the bacterial agents were isolated and identified by conventional microbiological methods. Out of the 149 samples, 142 samples were culture positive. Among 6 different isolates (4 Gram-negative and 2 Gram-positive), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (45 %) was predominant followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.3 %). A higher infection rate was seen among males (62.4 %) and in the age group 60-70 years (30.0 %). In addition, 25.4 % (36/149) samples were positive in Acid Fast staining. Bacterial recovery from the BAL fluid was significantly associated with the gender and age of the patients (p<0.05). Gentamycin was the least resisted (1.5 %) by Gram-negative isolates followed by Polymyxin-B (3 %). For Gram-positive isolates, Ofloxacin was the most effective drug resisted by none of the isolates followed by Gentamycin. Among the 157 isolates, 125 (79.6 %) were MDR and 35.0 % of Enterobacteriaceae were ESBL producers. Detection of bacterial agents from BAL fluid can be a basis for successful antimicrobial therapy for patients with pulmonary infections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hunan Institute of Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hunan Institute of Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/jist.v26i1.37833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hunan Institute of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jist.v26i1.37833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)是一种医学技术,通过从细支气管和肺泡中取出细胞和液体来诊断疾病或评估治疗。各种肺部感染的患者均遵循BAL的诊断程序,其诊断具有较高的敏感性和可靠性。为了研究肺部感染三级护理患者BAL液体的细菌病因学,在2018年8月至11月的三个月期间进行了一项横断面研究。共检测149份BAL液样,采用常规微生物学方法对细菌进行分离鉴定。149份样本中,142份培养阳性。革兰氏阴性菌4株,革兰氏阳性菌2株,以铜绿假单胞菌为主(45%),其次为肺炎克雷伯菌(25.3%)。男性感染率较高(62.4%),60-70岁年龄组感染率较高(30.0%)。另外,25.4%(36/149)的标本抗酸染色呈阳性。BAL液细菌回收率与患者性别、年龄显著相关(p<0.05)。革兰氏阴性菌株对庆大霉素的耐药性最低(1.5%),其次是多粘菌素- b(3%)。革兰氏阳性菌株对氧氟沙星的耐药效果最好,没有一株耐药,其次是庆大霉素。157株菌株中,125株(79.6%)为耐多药菌株,35.0%为ESBL产生菌。从BAL液中检测细菌制剂可作为肺部感染患者成功进行抗菌治疗的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bacterial Etiology of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Tertiary Care Patients and Antibiogram of the Isolates
Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) is a medical technique by which cells and fluids from bronchioles and lung alveoli are withdrawn for diagnosis of disease or evaluation of treatment. Patients with various pulmonary infections follow the procedure of BAL for the disease diagnosis as it has high sensitivity and reliability in diagnosis. To examine the bacterial etiology of BAL fluids among tertiary care patients with pulmonary infections, a cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of three months from August to November 2018. A total of 149 BAL fluid samples were examined and the bacterial agents were isolated and identified by conventional microbiological methods. Out of the 149 samples, 142 samples were culture positive. Among 6 different isolates (4 Gram-negative and 2 Gram-positive), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (45 %) was predominant followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.3 %). A higher infection rate was seen among males (62.4 %) and in the age group 60-70 years (30.0 %). In addition, 25.4 % (36/149) samples were positive in Acid Fast staining. Bacterial recovery from the BAL fluid was significantly associated with the gender and age of the patients (p<0.05). Gentamycin was the least resisted (1.5 %) by Gram-negative isolates followed by Polymyxin-B (3 %). For Gram-positive isolates, Ofloxacin was the most effective drug resisted by none of the isolates followed by Gentamycin. Among the 157 isolates, 125 (79.6 %) were MDR and 35.0 % of Enterobacteriaceae were ESBL producers. Detection of bacterial agents from BAL fluid can be a basis for successful antimicrobial therapy for patients with pulmonary infections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信