不同混合方法下胶囊型树脂改性玻璃离聚体孔隙率的比较

Jung-min Kim, Jin-Woo Kim, Kyung-Mo Cho, Yoon Lee, Eung-Hyun Kim, Se-Hee Park
{"title":"不同混合方法下胶囊型树脂改性玻璃离聚体孔隙率的比较","authors":"Jung-min Kim, Jin-Woo Kim, Kyung-Mo Cho, Yoon Lee, Eung-Hyun Kim, Se-Hee Park","doi":"10.14368/jdras.2021.37.4.217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the porosity of resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) by different mixing methods. Materials and Methods: Five specimens were prepared for each groups according to capsules and mixing methods. Two RMGI capsule and two mixing machines were used for this study. One resin-modified glass ionomer cement is Fuji II LC (F2LC) and the other is Photac Fil Quick Aplicap (PFQ). For Mixing of RMGI capsule, Rotomix using rotating motion and CM-II using shaking motion were used. After measuring height, radius and mass of specimens, Density was calculated. And porosity was measured using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). All data were statistically analyzed using T-test, two-way ANOVA to compare between groups at 95% significance level to evaluate the affect of capsule and mixing method on the porosity. Results: The porosity was observed in all specimens generally. And there is significant differece between porosities according to RMGI capsule and Mixing method. The porosity of PFQ was lower than that of F2LC and the porosity of Rotomix was lower than that of CM-II. Conclusion: There was a difference of porosity according to kind of capsules and mixing methods. When using same capsule, less porosity was observed on PFQ than F2LC. When using same mixing mehod, less porosity was observed on Rotomix than CM-II. Using mixing machine of same coporation as that of RMGI capsule did not lead to lower porosity. Therefore, Selecting optimal mixing machine is important. (J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2021;37(4):217-24)","PeriodicalId":15594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of capsule type resin modified glass ionomer porosity according to mixing methods\",\"authors\":\"Jung-min Kim, Jin-Woo Kim, Kyung-Mo Cho, Yoon Lee, Eung-Hyun Kim, Se-Hee Park\",\"doi\":\"10.14368/jdras.2021.37.4.217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the porosity of resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) by different mixing methods. Materials and Methods: Five specimens were prepared for each groups according to capsules and mixing methods. Two RMGI capsule and two mixing machines were used for this study. One resin-modified glass ionomer cement is Fuji II LC (F2LC) and the other is Photac Fil Quick Aplicap (PFQ). For Mixing of RMGI capsule, Rotomix using rotating motion and CM-II using shaking motion were used. After measuring height, radius and mass of specimens, Density was calculated. And porosity was measured using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). All data were statistically analyzed using T-test, two-way ANOVA to compare between groups at 95% significance level to evaluate the affect of capsule and mixing method on the porosity. Results: The porosity was observed in all specimens generally. And there is significant differece between porosities according to RMGI capsule and Mixing method. The porosity of PFQ was lower than that of F2LC and the porosity of Rotomix was lower than that of CM-II. Conclusion: There was a difference of porosity according to kind of capsules and mixing methods. When using same capsule, less porosity was observed on PFQ than F2LC. When using same mixing mehod, less porosity was observed on Rotomix than CM-II. Using mixing machine of same coporation as that of RMGI capsule did not lead to lower porosity. Therefore, Selecting optimal mixing machine is important. (J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2021;37(4):217-24)\",\"PeriodicalId\":15594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2021.37.4.217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2021.37.4.217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究树脂改性玻璃离聚体(RMGI)在不同混合方法下的孔隙率。材料和方法:按胶囊和混合方法,每组制备5个标本。本研究使用2个RMGI胶囊和2个混合机。一种树脂改性玻璃离子水泥是富士II LC (F2LC),另一种是Photac Fil Quick application (PFQ)。RMGI胶囊的混合使用旋转运动的Rotomix和振动运动的CM-II。测量试样的高度、半径和质量后,计算密度。孔隙度采用微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)测量。所有数据均采用t检验、双因素方差分析进行统计学分析,组间比较在95%显著水平下评价胶囊和混合方式对孔隙度的影响。结果:孔隙率在所有试样中普遍存在。而RMGI胶囊法和混合法的孔隙率存在显著差异。PFQ的孔隙率低于F2LC, Rotomix的孔隙率低于CM-II。结论:不同的胶囊种类和不同的混合方法,其孔隙率存在差异。使用相同的胶囊时,PFQ比F2LC的孔隙率更小。在相同的混合方法下,Rotomix的孔隙率低于CM-II。使用与RMGI胶囊相同配比的混合机并不会降低孔隙率。因此,选择最佳的混合机是很重要的。[J] .康复与应用科学,2021;37(4):217-24。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of capsule type resin modified glass ionomer porosity according to mixing methods
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the porosity of resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) by different mixing methods. Materials and Methods: Five specimens were prepared for each groups according to capsules and mixing methods. Two RMGI capsule and two mixing machines were used for this study. One resin-modified glass ionomer cement is Fuji II LC (F2LC) and the other is Photac Fil Quick Aplicap (PFQ). For Mixing of RMGI capsule, Rotomix using rotating motion and CM-II using shaking motion were used. After measuring height, radius and mass of specimens, Density was calculated. And porosity was measured using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). All data were statistically analyzed using T-test, two-way ANOVA to compare between groups at 95% significance level to evaluate the affect of capsule and mixing method on the porosity. Results: The porosity was observed in all specimens generally. And there is significant differece between porosities according to RMGI capsule and Mixing method. The porosity of PFQ was lower than that of F2LC and the porosity of Rotomix was lower than that of CM-II. Conclusion: There was a difference of porosity according to kind of capsules and mixing methods. When using same capsule, less porosity was observed on PFQ than F2LC. When using same mixing mehod, less porosity was observed on Rotomix than CM-II. Using mixing machine of same coporation as that of RMGI capsule did not lead to lower porosity. Therefore, Selecting optimal mixing machine is important. (J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2021;37(4):217-24)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信