犹太思想的高山界限:列奥·施特劳斯、国家社会主义和犹太主义

IF 0.2 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
W. Altman
{"title":"犹太思想的高山界限:列奥·施特劳斯、国家社会主义和犹太主义","authors":"W. Altman","doi":"10.1163/147728509X448975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing in 1935 as \"Hugo Fiala,\" Karl Lowith not only connected Martin Heidegger and Carl Schmitt to an apparently contentless \"decisionism\" but drew attention to the fact that his correspondent Leo Strauss (1899–1973) had attacked Schmitt—like Heidegger an open Nazi since 1933— from the Right in 1932. In opposition to the views of Peter Eli Gordon, Heidegger's bellicose stance at the Davos Hochschule of 1929 is presented as \"political\" in Schmitt's sense of the term while Strauss's embrace of Heidegger, never regretted, showed that he ceased to be Nietzsche's \"Good European\" in his thirtieth year. A more significant \"change of orientation\" is revealed in Strauss's 1932 version of the \"second cave,\" a pseudo-Platonic image of Verjudung . Revelation had disrupted a nihilistic \"natural ignorance\" that could only be reversed by an elite's secret decision for a self-contradictory content: only an atheistic religion provides a post-liberal solution to \"the theological-political problem.\"","PeriodicalId":42022,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Alpine Limits of Jewish Thought: Leo Strauss, National Socialism, and Judentum ohne Gott\",\"authors\":\"W. Altman\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/147728509X448975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Writing in 1935 as \\\"Hugo Fiala,\\\" Karl Lowith not only connected Martin Heidegger and Carl Schmitt to an apparently contentless \\\"decisionism\\\" but drew attention to the fact that his correspondent Leo Strauss (1899–1973) had attacked Schmitt—like Heidegger an open Nazi since 1933— from the Right in 1932. In opposition to the views of Peter Eli Gordon, Heidegger's bellicose stance at the Davos Hochschule of 1929 is presented as \\\"political\\\" in Schmitt's sense of the term while Strauss's embrace of Heidegger, never regretted, showed that he ceased to be Nietzsche's \\\"Good European\\\" in his thirtieth year. A more significant \\\"change of orientation\\\" is revealed in Strauss's 1932 version of the \\\"second cave,\\\" a pseudo-Platonic image of Verjudung . Revelation had disrupted a nihilistic \\\"natural ignorance\\\" that could only be reversed by an elite's secret decision for a self-contradictory content: only an atheistic religion provides a post-liberal solution to \\\"the theological-political problem.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":42022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/147728509X448975\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/147728509X448975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

1935年,卡尔·洛维斯以“雨果·菲亚拉”的名字写了一篇文章,他不仅把马丁·海德格尔和卡尔·施密特与一种显然不满足的“决定主义”联系在一起,而且让人们注意到这样一个事实:他的通讯记者利奥·施特劳斯(1899-1973)在1932年从右翼开始攻击施密特——像海德格尔一样,自1933年以来就是一个公开的纳粹分子。与彼得·伊莱·戈登(Peter Eli Gordon)的观点相反,海德格尔1929年在达沃斯大学(Davos Hochschule)的好战立场在施密特的意义上被呈现为“政治”,而施特劳斯对海德格尔的拥抱,从未后悔,表明他在30岁时不再是尼采的“好欧洲人”。在施特劳斯1932年的“第二个洞穴”版本中,揭示了一个更重要的“方向变化”,这是一个伪柏拉图式的Verjudung形象。《启示录》打破了虚无主义的“自然无知”,这种“自然无知”只能通过精英们对自相矛盾的内容的秘密决定来逆转:只有无神论宗教才能为“神学-政治问题”提供后自由主义的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Alpine Limits of Jewish Thought: Leo Strauss, National Socialism, and Judentum ohne Gott
Writing in 1935 as "Hugo Fiala," Karl Lowith not only connected Martin Heidegger and Carl Schmitt to an apparently contentless "decisionism" but drew attention to the fact that his correspondent Leo Strauss (1899–1973) had attacked Schmitt—like Heidegger an open Nazi since 1933— from the Right in 1932. In opposition to the views of Peter Eli Gordon, Heidegger's bellicose stance at the Davos Hochschule of 1929 is presented as "political" in Schmitt's sense of the term while Strauss's embrace of Heidegger, never regretted, showed that he ceased to be Nietzsche's "Good European" in his thirtieth year. A more significant "change of orientation" is revealed in Strauss's 1932 version of the "second cave," a pseudo-Platonic image of Verjudung . Revelation had disrupted a nihilistic "natural ignorance" that could only be reversed by an elite's secret decision for a self-contradictory content: only an atheistic religion provides a post-liberal solution to "the theological-political problem."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信