关于自由诉诸司法权利的演变和承认的方面

A. Smochină, Eugeniu Trocin
{"title":"关于自由诉诸司法权利的演变和承认的方面","authors":"A. Smochină, Eugeniu Trocin","doi":"10.52388/1811-0770.2022.1(247).10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of free access to justice is widely debated, both in the literature and in jurisprudence, the institution being distinguished by nuanced approaches depending on the branch of law that claims access to justice as a specific institution. Over time, free access to justice has been established as a fundamental principle of achieving justice, along with the principles of legality, good administration of justice, ensuring a fair trial, publicity of the trial, impartiality of the judge, and proportionality in the application of sanctions. Thus, given the reasoning that the most effective remedy for acts or acts of violation of subjective rights, including fundamental rights, or legitimate interests, is justice, which involves options and solutions based on the demands of justice, morality and fairness both in the process of drafting the law, as well as in the process of applying the legal norms, we set out to carry out a scientific approach on the evolution and consecration of the right of free access to justice from the ancient period to the present.","PeriodicalId":83195,"journal":{"name":"The National law journal","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspects regarding the evolution and recognition of the right to free access to justice\",\"authors\":\"A. Smochină, Eugeniu Trocin\",\"doi\":\"10.52388/1811-0770.2022.1(247).10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issue of free access to justice is widely debated, both in the literature and in jurisprudence, the institution being distinguished by nuanced approaches depending on the branch of law that claims access to justice as a specific institution. Over time, free access to justice has been established as a fundamental principle of achieving justice, along with the principles of legality, good administration of justice, ensuring a fair trial, publicity of the trial, impartiality of the judge, and proportionality in the application of sanctions. Thus, given the reasoning that the most effective remedy for acts or acts of violation of subjective rights, including fundamental rights, or legitimate interests, is justice, which involves options and solutions based on the demands of justice, morality and fairness both in the process of drafting the law, as well as in the process of applying the legal norms, we set out to carry out a scientific approach on the evolution and consecration of the right of free access to justice from the ancient period to the present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The National law journal\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The National law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52388/1811-0770.2022.1(247).10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52388/1811-0770.2022.1(247).10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自由诉诸司法的问题在文献和法理学中都有广泛的争论,该制度被区分为细微的方法,这取决于声称诉诸司法作为特定制度的法律分支。随着时间的推移,自由诉诸司法已被确立为实现正义的一项基本原则,同时确立的还有合法性、良好的司法管理、确保公平审判、公开审判、法官的公正性和适用制裁的相称性等原则。因此,鉴于对侵犯主观权利,包括基本权利或合法利益的行为或行为的最有效补救是正义,这包括在法律起草过程中以及在适用法律规范过程中基于正义、道德和公平要求的选择和解决办法,我们着手对从古至今自由诉诸司法的权利的演变和神圣化进行科学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aspects regarding the evolution and recognition of the right to free access to justice
The issue of free access to justice is widely debated, both in the literature and in jurisprudence, the institution being distinguished by nuanced approaches depending on the branch of law that claims access to justice as a specific institution. Over time, free access to justice has been established as a fundamental principle of achieving justice, along with the principles of legality, good administration of justice, ensuring a fair trial, publicity of the trial, impartiality of the judge, and proportionality in the application of sanctions. Thus, given the reasoning that the most effective remedy for acts or acts of violation of subjective rights, including fundamental rights, or legitimate interests, is justice, which involves options and solutions based on the demands of justice, morality and fairness both in the process of drafting the law, as well as in the process of applying the legal norms, we set out to carry out a scientific approach on the evolution and consecration of the right of free access to justice from the ancient period to the present.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信