M. Baggaley, G. Vernillo, Aaron Martínez, N. Horvais, M. Giandolini, G. Millet, W. B. Edwards
{"title":"步长和坡度对跑步时能量吸收和冲击衰减的影响","authors":"M. Baggaley, G. Vernillo, Aaron Martínez, N. Horvais, M. Giandolini, G. Millet, W. B. Edwards","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2019.1664639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n We sought to examine the effect of step length manipulation on energy absorption and impact attenuation during graded running. Nineteen runners (10F, 9M) ran on an instrumented treadmill at three step lengths (preferred and ±10% preferred) at each of five grades (0°, ±5°, and ±10°) while 3D motion data were captured. Speed was held constant at 3.33 m/s and step length was manipulated by syncing cadence to a metronome. Manipulating step length altered energy absorption (p ≤ 0.002) and impact attenuation (p < 0.0001) across all grades. Energy absorption at the knee joint was most responsive to step length manipulations [Δ range (±10%SL-PrefSL) = 0.076–0.126 J/kg, p < 0.0001], followed by the ankle (Δ range = 0.026–0.100 J/kg, p = 0.001) and hip (Δ range = 0.008–0.018 J/kg, p < 0.006). Shortening step length reduced knee joint energy absorption at all grades with the smallest effect observed during uphill running (Δ ≥ −0.053 J/kg), while large reductions occurred during level (Δ = −0.096 J/kg) and downhill running (Δ ≥ −0.108 J/kg). Increasing step length resulted in greater knee joint energy absorption (p ≤ 0.037) across all grades of running. Impact attenuation was greatest at long step lengths (Δ = 2.708) and lowest at short step lengths (Δ = −2.061), compared to preferred. Overall, Step length influenced the energy absorption and impact attenuation characteristics of the lower extremity during level and graded running. Adopting a shorter step length may be a useful intervention to reduce knee joint loading, particularly during downhill or level running. Elongating step length placed a greater demand on the lower extremity joints, which may expedite the development of neuromuscular fatigue.","PeriodicalId":12061,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Sport Science","volume":"193 1","pages":"756 - 766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Step length and grade effects on energy absorption and impact attenuation in running\",\"authors\":\"M. Baggaley, G. Vernillo, Aaron Martínez, N. Horvais, M. Giandolini, G. Millet, W. B. Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17461391.2019.1664639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract\\n We sought to examine the effect of step length manipulation on energy absorption and impact attenuation during graded running. Nineteen runners (10F, 9M) ran on an instrumented treadmill at three step lengths (preferred and ±10% preferred) at each of five grades (0°, ±5°, and ±10°) while 3D motion data were captured. Speed was held constant at 3.33 m/s and step length was manipulated by syncing cadence to a metronome. Manipulating step length altered energy absorption (p ≤ 0.002) and impact attenuation (p < 0.0001) across all grades. Energy absorption at the knee joint was most responsive to step length manipulations [Δ range (±10%SL-PrefSL) = 0.076–0.126 J/kg, p < 0.0001], followed by the ankle (Δ range = 0.026–0.100 J/kg, p = 0.001) and hip (Δ range = 0.008–0.018 J/kg, p < 0.006). Shortening step length reduced knee joint energy absorption at all grades with the smallest effect observed during uphill running (Δ ≥ −0.053 J/kg), while large reductions occurred during level (Δ = −0.096 J/kg) and downhill running (Δ ≥ −0.108 J/kg). Increasing step length resulted in greater knee joint energy absorption (p ≤ 0.037) across all grades of running. Impact attenuation was greatest at long step lengths (Δ = 2.708) and lowest at short step lengths (Δ = −2.061), compared to preferred. Overall, Step length influenced the energy absorption and impact attenuation characteristics of the lower extremity during level and graded running. Adopting a shorter step length may be a useful intervention to reduce knee joint loading, particularly during downhill or level running. Elongating step length placed a greater demand on the lower extremity joints, which may expedite the development of neuromuscular fatigue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Sport Science\",\"volume\":\"193 1\",\"pages\":\"756 - 766\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Sport Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2019.1664639\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Sport Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2019.1664639","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
摘要
摘要:我们试图研究步长控制对分级跑步过程中能量吸收和冲击衰减的影响。19名跑步者(10F, 9M)在仪器化的跑步机上以3种步长(优选和±10%优选)在5个等级(0°,±5°和±10°)中的每一种上跑步,同时捕获3D运动数据。速度保持在3.33米/秒恒定,步长通过同步节奏来控制节拍器。控制步长改变了所有等级的能量吸收(p≤0.002)和冲击衰减(p < 0.0001)。膝关节的能量吸收对步长操作反应最灵敏[Δ范围(±10%SL-PrefSL) = 0.076-0.126 J/kg, p < 0.0001],其次是踝关节(Δ范围= 0.026-0.100 J/kg, p = 0.001)和髋关节(Δ范围= 0.008-0.018 J/kg, p < 0.006)。缩短步长降低了所有级别的膝关节能量吸收,上坡跑(Δ≥−0.053 J/kg)效果最小,水平跑(Δ =−0.096 J/kg)和下坡跑(Δ≥−0.108 J/kg)效果最大。在所有级别的跑步中,增加步长导致更大的膝关节能量吸收(p≤0.037)。与优选相比,长步长时冲击衰减最大(Δ = 2.708),短步长时最小(Δ =−2.061)。总的来说,步长影响了水平和分级跑步时下肢的能量吸收和冲击衰减特性。采用较短的步长可能是减少膝关节负荷的有效干预措施,特别是在下坡或水平跑步时。延长步长对下肢关节的要求更高,这可能加速神经肌肉疲劳的发展。
Step length and grade effects on energy absorption and impact attenuation in running
Abstract
We sought to examine the effect of step length manipulation on energy absorption and impact attenuation during graded running. Nineteen runners (10F, 9M) ran on an instrumented treadmill at three step lengths (preferred and ±10% preferred) at each of five grades (0°, ±5°, and ±10°) while 3D motion data were captured. Speed was held constant at 3.33 m/s and step length was manipulated by syncing cadence to a metronome. Manipulating step length altered energy absorption (p ≤ 0.002) and impact attenuation (p < 0.0001) across all grades. Energy absorption at the knee joint was most responsive to step length manipulations [Δ range (±10%SL-PrefSL) = 0.076–0.126 J/kg, p < 0.0001], followed by the ankle (Δ range = 0.026–0.100 J/kg, p = 0.001) and hip (Δ range = 0.008–0.018 J/kg, p < 0.006). Shortening step length reduced knee joint energy absorption at all grades with the smallest effect observed during uphill running (Δ ≥ −0.053 J/kg), while large reductions occurred during level (Δ = −0.096 J/kg) and downhill running (Δ ≥ −0.108 J/kg). Increasing step length resulted in greater knee joint energy absorption (p ≤ 0.037) across all grades of running. Impact attenuation was greatest at long step lengths (Δ = 2.708) and lowest at short step lengths (Δ = −2.061), compared to preferred. Overall, Step length influenced the energy absorption and impact attenuation characteristics of the lower extremity during level and graded running. Adopting a shorter step length may be a useful intervention to reduce knee joint loading, particularly during downhill or level running. Elongating step length placed a greater demand on the lower extremity joints, which may expedite the development of neuromuscular fatigue.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Sport Science (EJSS) is the official Medline- and Thomson Reuters-listed journal of the European College of Sport Science. The editorial policy of the Journal pursues the multi-disciplinary aims of the College: to promote the highest standards of scientific study and scholarship in respect of the following fields: (a) Applied Sport Sciences; (b) Biomechanics and Motor Control; c) Physiology and Nutrition; (d) Psychology, Social Sciences and Humanities and (e) Sports and Exercise Medicine and Health.