{"title":"卢克莱修从1460年代到17世纪:七个归属问题","authors":"M. Reeve","doi":"10.1400/77060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a sequel to 'The Italian tradition of Lucretius' and 'The Italian tradition of Lucretius revisited' \\ I begin with information about O and Vienna 170 that would have gone into the second article if I had possessed it at the time of writing. I then deal in roughly chronological order with seven questions that all in one way or another concern attribution. Into the chronological sequence I insert two sections that do not.","PeriodicalId":55949,"journal":{"name":"AEVUM-RASSEGNA DI SCIENZE STORICHE LINGUISTICHE E FILOLOGICHE","volume":"49 1","pages":"165-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lucretius from the 1460s to the 17th century: seven questions of attribution\",\"authors\":\"M. Reeve\",\"doi\":\"10.1400/77060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is a sequel to 'The Italian tradition of Lucretius' and 'The Italian tradition of Lucretius revisited' \\\\ I begin with information about O and Vienna 170 that would have gone into the second article if I had possessed it at the time of writing. I then deal in roughly chronological order with seven questions that all in one way or another concern attribution. Into the chronological sequence I insert two sections that do not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEVUM-RASSEGNA DI SCIENZE STORICHE LINGUISTICHE E FILOLOGICHE\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"165-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEVUM-RASSEGNA DI SCIENZE STORICHE LINGUISTICHE E FILOLOGICHE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1400/77060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEVUM-RASSEGNA DI SCIENZE STORICHE LINGUISTICHE E FILOLOGICHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/77060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lucretius from the 1460s to the 17th century: seven questions of attribution
This article is a sequel to 'The Italian tradition of Lucretius' and 'The Italian tradition of Lucretius revisited' \ I begin with information about O and Vienna 170 that would have gone into the second article if I had possessed it at the time of writing. I then deal in roughly chronological order with seven questions that all in one way or another concern attribution. Into the chronological sequence I insert two sections that do not.