当代股浅动脉和腘动脉疾病的血管内治疗:一种基于器械的综合策略。

S. Lyden, T. Shimshak
{"title":"当代股浅动脉和腘动脉疾病的血管内治疗:一种基于器械的综合策略。","authors":"S. Lyden, T. Shimshak","doi":"10.1583/05-1757.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endovascular therapy for disease of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and the popliteal artery remains controversial. Percutaneous treatment of this arterial segment presents a particular technical challenge, as the extent of disease varies from short, focal, and stenotic to long, diffuse, and occluded lesions. Over the last 2 decades, multiple therapies have been evaluated, including simple balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stenting (both balloon-expandable and self-expanding), and more recently, intra-arterial radiation, laser, and cryotherapy. Regardless of which modality is used, however, endovascular therapy as a revascularization strategy has the potential to improve symptoms and quality of life and, in selected patients, to avoid limb amputation. While percutaneous endovascular treatment has been historically associated with high procedural success and favorable short and intermediate-term patency rates, long-term clinical results have proven disappointing. Conventional balloon angioplasty is limited by elastic recoil, dissection, and restenosis. Balloon-expandable stents (particularly in the distal SFA) are associated with late stent deformation and mechanical compression, with resultant late clinical failure. Newer self-expanding stents have shown improved initial results but have been limited by late mechanical fatigue and associated restenosis. With the development of several newer endovascular techniques in recent years, the possibilities for treating this condition have increased dramatically. Currently, no long-term comparative data exist regarding the role of these alternative technologies. This article summarizes and compares important data about new endovascular options for intervention therapy in SFA and popliteal disease. In addition, based on this analysis, we propose a contemporary treatment strategy, integrating older and newer technologies into a real-world algorithm.","PeriodicalId":60152,"journal":{"name":"血管与腔内血管外科杂志","volume":"13 Suppl 2 1","pages":"II41-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary endovascular treatment for disease of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries: an integrated device-based strategy.\",\"authors\":\"S. Lyden, T. Shimshak\",\"doi\":\"10.1583/05-1757.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Endovascular therapy for disease of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and the popliteal artery remains controversial. Percutaneous treatment of this arterial segment presents a particular technical challenge, as the extent of disease varies from short, focal, and stenotic to long, diffuse, and occluded lesions. Over the last 2 decades, multiple therapies have been evaluated, including simple balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stenting (both balloon-expandable and self-expanding), and more recently, intra-arterial radiation, laser, and cryotherapy. Regardless of which modality is used, however, endovascular therapy as a revascularization strategy has the potential to improve symptoms and quality of life and, in selected patients, to avoid limb amputation. While percutaneous endovascular treatment has been historically associated with high procedural success and favorable short and intermediate-term patency rates, long-term clinical results have proven disappointing. Conventional balloon angioplasty is limited by elastic recoil, dissection, and restenosis. Balloon-expandable stents (particularly in the distal SFA) are associated with late stent deformation and mechanical compression, with resultant late clinical failure. Newer self-expanding stents have shown improved initial results but have been limited by late mechanical fatigue and associated restenosis. With the development of several newer endovascular techniques in recent years, the possibilities for treating this condition have increased dramatically. Currently, no long-term comparative data exist regarding the role of these alternative technologies. This article summarizes and compares important data about new endovascular options for intervention therapy in SFA and popliteal disease. In addition, based on this analysis, we propose a contemporary treatment strategy, integrating older and newer technologies into a real-world algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":60152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"血管与腔内血管外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"13 Suppl 2 1\",\"pages\":\"II41-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"血管与腔内血管外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1583/05-1757.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"血管与腔内血管外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1583/05-1757.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

股浅动脉(SFA)和腘动脉疾病的血管内治疗仍然存在争议。经皮治疗该动脉段具有特殊的技术挑战,因为疾病范围从短、局灶性狭窄到长、弥漫性闭塞病变不等。在过去的20年里,多种治疗方法已经被评估,包括简单的球囊血管成形术、定向动脉粥样硬化切除术、支架植入术(球囊可扩张和自扩张),以及最近的动脉内放疗、激光和冷冻治疗。然而,无论采用哪种方式,血管内治疗作为一种血运重建策略都有可能改善症状和生活质量,并在选定的患者中避免截肢。虽然经皮血管内治疗历来具有较高的手术成功率和有利的短期和中期通畅率,但长期临床结果令人失望。传统球囊血管成形术受弹性反冲、夹层和再狭窄的限制。球囊可膨胀支架(特别是SFA远端)与支架晚期变形和机械压缩相关,导致晚期临床失败。较新的自扩张支架显示出改善的初步结果,但受到后期机械疲劳和相关再狭窄的限制。近年来,随着一些新的血管内技术的发展,治疗这种疾病的可能性急剧增加。目前,还没有关于这些替代技术作用的长期比较数据。本文总结和比较了血管内介入治疗SFA和腘窝疾病的重要资料。此外,基于这一分析,我们提出了一种当代治疗策略,将新旧技术整合到现实世界的算法中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contemporary endovascular treatment for disease of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries: an integrated device-based strategy.
Endovascular therapy for disease of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and the popliteal artery remains controversial. Percutaneous treatment of this arterial segment presents a particular technical challenge, as the extent of disease varies from short, focal, and stenotic to long, diffuse, and occluded lesions. Over the last 2 decades, multiple therapies have been evaluated, including simple balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stenting (both balloon-expandable and self-expanding), and more recently, intra-arterial radiation, laser, and cryotherapy. Regardless of which modality is used, however, endovascular therapy as a revascularization strategy has the potential to improve symptoms and quality of life and, in selected patients, to avoid limb amputation. While percutaneous endovascular treatment has been historically associated with high procedural success and favorable short and intermediate-term patency rates, long-term clinical results have proven disappointing. Conventional balloon angioplasty is limited by elastic recoil, dissection, and restenosis. Balloon-expandable stents (particularly in the distal SFA) are associated with late stent deformation and mechanical compression, with resultant late clinical failure. Newer self-expanding stents have shown improved initial results but have been limited by late mechanical fatigue and associated restenosis. With the development of several newer endovascular techniques in recent years, the possibilities for treating this condition have increased dramatically. Currently, no long-term comparative data exist regarding the role of these alternative technologies. This article summarizes and compares important data about new endovascular options for intervention therapy in SFA and popliteal disease. In addition, based on this analysis, we propose a contemporary treatment strategy, integrating older and newer technologies into a real-world algorithm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
947
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信