纽拉伯的谋杀和“法律的执行”

IF 0.4 Q1 HISTORY
Peter Gifford
{"title":"纽拉伯的谋杀和“法律的执行”","authors":"Peter Gifford","doi":"10.22459/AH.18.2011.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Truslove had been sent to the Eucla district, on the southern fringes of the Nullarbor plain, to distribute and collect papers for the census of 1881. While there (but not, apparently, as a first priority), he was to investigate claims that William Stuart McGill and his partners Thomas and William Kennedy had been mistreating 'natives' on their Mondra Bellae (now Mundrabilla) sheep run, 100 kilometres west of the Eucla Overland Telegraph station. Truslove's report effectively accused McGill and the Kennedys of multiple murder. Its contents were mostly hearsay, which then as now was not admissible in a court of law. Yet as an experienced police officer he must have been aware of the gravity of such allegations, which would be seen at high governmental levels, and he cannot therefore have made them lightly. As will be seen, they were supported overwhelmingly by statements from the Overland Telegraph stationmasters at Eyre's Sandpatch and Eucla nearly eight years later, but not acted on either in terms of criminal prosecution, even though both men were known to be of good repute. What will be attempted here is an examination of the reasons behind such official inaction; to try to establish why a police officer's report, obtained in difficult circumstances and even at some personal risk (from the elements, if not from the pastoralists) should have been allowed to slide into official oblivion","PeriodicalId":42397,"journal":{"name":"Aboriginal History","volume":"32 1","pages":"103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Murder and 'the Execution of the Law' on the Nullarbor\",\"authors\":\"Peter Gifford\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/AH.18.2011.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Truslove had been sent to the Eucla district, on the southern fringes of the Nullarbor plain, to distribute and collect papers for the census of 1881. While there (but not, apparently, as a first priority), he was to investigate claims that William Stuart McGill and his partners Thomas and William Kennedy had been mistreating 'natives' on their Mondra Bellae (now Mundrabilla) sheep run, 100 kilometres west of the Eucla Overland Telegraph station. Truslove's report effectively accused McGill and the Kennedys of multiple murder. Its contents were mostly hearsay, which then as now was not admissible in a court of law. Yet as an experienced police officer he must have been aware of the gravity of such allegations, which would be seen at high governmental levels, and he cannot therefore have made them lightly. As will be seen, they were supported overwhelmingly by statements from the Overland Telegraph stationmasters at Eyre's Sandpatch and Eucla nearly eight years later, but not acted on either in terms of criminal prosecution, even though both men were known to be of good repute. What will be attempted here is an examination of the reasons behind such official inaction; to try to establish why a police officer's report, obtained in difficult circumstances and even at some personal risk (from the elements, if not from the pastoralists) should have been allowed to slide into official oblivion\",\"PeriodicalId\":42397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aboriginal History\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aboriginal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/AH.18.2011.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aboriginal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AH.18.2011.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特拉斯洛夫被派往纽拉伯平原南部边缘的尤克拉地区,分发和收集1881年人口普查的文件。在那里(但显然不是首要任务),他要调查有关威廉·斯图尔特·麦吉尔和他的伙伴托马斯·肯尼迪和威廉·肯尼迪虐待蒙德拉贝拉(现在的蒙德拉比拉)羊群的“当地人”的指控,这些羊群位于尤克拉陆上电报站以西100公里处。特鲁斯洛夫的报告有效地指控了麦吉尔和肯尼迪家族的多起谋杀案。它的内容大多是道听途说,当时和现在一样,在法庭上是不能接受的。然而,作为一名经验丰富的警官,他一定意识到这种指控的严重性,这种指控会出现在政府高层,因此他不能轻易提出这些指控。正如我们将看到的那样,近八年后,他们得到了艾尔沙场和尤克拉的陆上电报站长的压倒性支持,但在刑事起诉方面没有采取任何行动,尽管这两个人都享有良好的声誉。在这里,我们将试图考察这种官方不作为背后的原因;试图确定为什么一个警察的报告,在困难的情况下,甚至冒着一些个人风险(从自然因素,如果不是从牧民),应该被允许进入官方遗忘
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Murder and 'the Execution of the Law' on the Nullarbor
Truslove had been sent to the Eucla district, on the southern fringes of the Nullarbor plain, to distribute and collect papers for the census of 1881. While there (but not, apparently, as a first priority), he was to investigate claims that William Stuart McGill and his partners Thomas and William Kennedy had been mistreating 'natives' on their Mondra Bellae (now Mundrabilla) sheep run, 100 kilometres west of the Eucla Overland Telegraph station. Truslove's report effectively accused McGill and the Kennedys of multiple murder. Its contents were mostly hearsay, which then as now was not admissible in a court of law. Yet as an experienced police officer he must have been aware of the gravity of such allegations, which would be seen at high governmental levels, and he cannot therefore have made them lightly. As will be seen, they were supported overwhelmingly by statements from the Overland Telegraph stationmasters at Eyre's Sandpatch and Eucla nearly eight years later, but not acted on either in terms of criminal prosecution, even though both men were known to be of good repute. What will be attempted here is an examination of the reasons behind such official inaction; to try to establish why a police officer's report, obtained in difficult circumstances and even at some personal risk (from the elements, if not from the pastoralists) should have been allowed to slide into official oblivion
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信