Mahnaz Shahverdi, A. Sabertanha, Fahimeh Nikraftar, Gholamhossein Mahmoudirad
{"title":"经尿道前列腺切除术腰麻低剂量高压布比卡因加芬太尼与高压布比卡因:血流动力学影响、镇痛持续时间和运动阻滞","authors":"Mahnaz Shahverdi, A. Sabertanha, Fahimeh Nikraftar, Gholamhossein Mahmoudirad","doi":"10.22038/EBCJ.2020.44906.2218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most prevalent anesthetic method used for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) surgery. Lower motor block and fewer side effects can be achieved by lower doses of anesthesia. Aim: The present study aimed to compare the effects of Spinal anesthesia with a low dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine plus fentanyl with hyperbaric bupivacaine for TURP surgery on hemodynamic effects, duration of analgesia, and Motor block. Method: This randomized-controlled study was conducted on 62 patients undergoing TURP surgery within 2017-18. BF group received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine(1mg) 0.2 ml+fentanyl (20µg) 0.4 ml+5% dextrose 1.4ml, while B group received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10mg)2ml. Bromage scale and Visual Analog Scale of pain and Nausea were used. The obtained data were analyzed in SPSS software version (20). Results: Groups were homogenous in terms of demographic characteristics. The time to reach the sensory level of T10 was significantly longer in the BF group, compared to the B group (P<0.001). The motor block score was less in the BF group than the B group. The mean total recovery time of the sensory block to L5 in the BF group was significantly lower than that of the BF group (P<0.001). The mean score of nausea severity during surgery was significantly lower in the BF group, compared to the B group (P=0.02). The hemodynamic stability was higher in the BF group. Implications for Practice: A combination of 1mg bupivacaine with 20μg fentanyl could be used for anesthesia in TURP surgery as an effective method to provide sufficient analgesic effects, as well as lower motor block and side effects.","PeriodicalId":37304,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Care Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"18-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spinal Anesthesia with a Low Dose of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine plus Fentanyl versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Transurethral Resection of Prostate surgery: Hemodynamic Effects, Duration of Analgesia and Motor Block\",\"authors\":\"Mahnaz Shahverdi, A. Sabertanha, Fahimeh Nikraftar, Gholamhossein Mahmoudirad\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/EBCJ.2020.44906.2218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most prevalent anesthetic method used for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) surgery. Lower motor block and fewer side effects can be achieved by lower doses of anesthesia. Aim: The present study aimed to compare the effects of Spinal anesthesia with a low dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine plus fentanyl with hyperbaric bupivacaine for TURP surgery on hemodynamic effects, duration of analgesia, and Motor block. Method: This randomized-controlled study was conducted on 62 patients undergoing TURP surgery within 2017-18. BF group received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine(1mg) 0.2 ml+fentanyl (20µg) 0.4 ml+5% dextrose 1.4ml, while B group received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10mg)2ml. Bromage scale and Visual Analog Scale of pain and Nausea were used. The obtained data were analyzed in SPSS software version (20). Results: Groups were homogenous in terms of demographic characteristics. The time to reach the sensory level of T10 was significantly longer in the BF group, compared to the B group (P<0.001). The motor block score was less in the BF group than the B group. The mean total recovery time of the sensory block to L5 in the BF group was significantly lower than that of the BF group (P<0.001). The mean score of nausea severity during surgery was significantly lower in the BF group, compared to the B group (P=0.02). The hemodynamic stability was higher in the BF group. Implications for Practice: A combination of 1mg bupivacaine with 20μg fentanyl could be used for anesthesia in TURP surgery as an effective method to provide sufficient analgesic effects, as well as lower motor block and side effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Care Journal\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"18-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Care Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/EBCJ.2020.44906.2218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/EBCJ.2020.44906.2218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spinal Anesthesia with a Low Dose of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine plus Fentanyl versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Transurethral Resection of Prostate surgery: Hemodynamic Effects, Duration of Analgesia and Motor Block
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most prevalent anesthetic method used for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) surgery. Lower motor block and fewer side effects can be achieved by lower doses of anesthesia. Aim: The present study aimed to compare the effects of Spinal anesthesia with a low dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine plus fentanyl with hyperbaric bupivacaine for TURP surgery on hemodynamic effects, duration of analgesia, and Motor block. Method: This randomized-controlled study was conducted on 62 patients undergoing TURP surgery within 2017-18. BF group received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine(1mg) 0.2 ml+fentanyl (20µg) 0.4 ml+5% dextrose 1.4ml, while B group received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10mg)2ml. Bromage scale and Visual Analog Scale of pain and Nausea were used. The obtained data were analyzed in SPSS software version (20). Results: Groups were homogenous in terms of demographic characteristics. The time to reach the sensory level of T10 was significantly longer in the BF group, compared to the B group (P<0.001). The motor block score was less in the BF group than the B group. The mean total recovery time of the sensory block to L5 in the BF group was significantly lower than that of the BF group (P<0.001). The mean score of nausea severity during surgery was significantly lower in the BF group, compared to the B group (P=0.02). The hemodynamic stability was higher in the BF group. Implications for Practice: A combination of 1mg bupivacaine with 20μg fentanyl could be used for anesthesia in TURP surgery as an effective method to provide sufficient analgesic effects, as well as lower motor block and side effects.
期刊介绍:
The Evidence Based Care Journal (EBCJ) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of patient care. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports patient care in practice. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, EBCJ seeks to enrich insight into clinical needs and the implications for patient care intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on clinical practicality of research findings and strength of study design. EBCJ is essential reading for anyone involved in healthcare professions, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on patient care.