{"title":"隐私是保护言论自由的盾牌，还是打击言论自由的利剑?","authors":"Vishal Rakhecha","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2020.1865654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The right of privacy after the judgement of the Supreme Court in Puttaswamy has been used as a means to restrict publication of private information of public officials by news media. This could lead to the stifling of free-speech rights of media. An appropriate balance would need to be struck between the normative values underlying these rights. On the one hand, protecting the dignity and autonomy of an individual, and on the other publishing information that is going to be in public interest.","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy, the shield that protects or the sword that strikes freedom of speech?\",\"authors\":\"Vishal Rakhecha\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24730580.2020.1865654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The right of privacy after the judgement of the Supreme Court in Puttaswamy has been used as a means to restrict publication of private information of public officials by news media. This could lead to the stifling of free-speech rights of media. An appropriate balance would need to be struck between the normative values underlying these rights. On the one hand, protecting the dignity and autonomy of an individual, and on the other publishing information that is going to be in public interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2020.1865654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2020.1865654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Privacy, the shield that protects or the sword that strikes freedom of speech?
ABSTRACT The right of privacy after the judgement of the Supreme Court in Puttaswamy has been used as a means to restrict publication of private information of public officials by news media. This could lead to the stifling of free-speech rights of media. An appropriate balance would need to be struck between the normative values underlying these rights. On the one hand, protecting the dignity and autonomy of an individual, and on the other publishing information that is going to be in public interest.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
