{"title":"一个估计零售银行产品不当销售损失的结构模型","authors":"Huan Yan, R. Wood","doi":"10.21314/JOP.2017.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a structural model is presented for estimating losses associated with the mis-selling of retail banking products. This is the first paper to consider factor-based modeling for this operational/conduct risk scenario. The approach employed makes use of frequency/severity techniques under the established loss distribution approach (LDA). Rather than calibrate the constituent distributions through the typical means of loss data or expert opinion, this paper develops a structural approach in which these are determined using bespoke models built on the underlying risk drivers and dynamics. For retail mis-selling, the frequency distribution is constructed using a Bayesian network, while the severity distribution is constructed using system dynamics. This has not been used to date in driver-based models for operational risk. In using system dynamics, with elements of queuing theory and multi-objective optimization, this paper advocates a versatile attitude with regard to modeling by ensuring the model is appropriately representative of the scenario in question. The constructed model is thereafter applied to a specific and currently relevant scenario involving packaged bank accounts, and illustrative capital estimates are determined. This paper finds that using structural models could provide a more risk-sensitive alternative to using loss data or expert opinion in scenario-level risk quantification. Further, these models could be exploited for a variety of risk management uses, such as the assessment of control efficacy and operational and resource planning.","PeriodicalId":54030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operational Risk","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Structural Model for Estimating Losses Associated with the Mis-selling of Retail Banking Products\",\"authors\":\"Huan Yan, R. Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.21314/JOP.2017.186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a structural model is presented for estimating losses associated with the mis-selling of retail banking products. This is the first paper to consider factor-based modeling for this operational/conduct risk scenario. The approach employed makes use of frequency/severity techniques under the established loss distribution approach (LDA). Rather than calibrate the constituent distributions through the typical means of loss data or expert opinion, this paper develops a structural approach in which these are determined using bespoke models built on the underlying risk drivers and dynamics. For retail mis-selling, the frequency distribution is constructed using a Bayesian network, while the severity distribution is constructed using system dynamics. This has not been used to date in driver-based models for operational risk. In using system dynamics, with elements of queuing theory and multi-objective optimization, this paper advocates a versatile attitude with regard to modeling by ensuring the model is appropriately representative of the scenario in question. The constructed model is thereafter applied to a specific and currently relevant scenario involving packaged bank accounts, and illustrative capital estimates are determined. This paper finds that using structural models could provide a more risk-sensitive alternative to using loss data or expert opinion in scenario-level risk quantification. Further, these models could be exploited for a variety of risk management uses, such as the assessment of control efficacy and operational and resource planning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Operational Risk\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Operational Risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21314/JOP.2017.186\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operational Risk","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/JOP.2017.186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Structural Model for Estimating Losses Associated with the Mis-selling of Retail Banking Products
In this paper, a structural model is presented for estimating losses associated with the mis-selling of retail banking products. This is the first paper to consider factor-based modeling for this operational/conduct risk scenario. The approach employed makes use of frequency/severity techniques under the established loss distribution approach (LDA). Rather than calibrate the constituent distributions through the typical means of loss data or expert opinion, this paper develops a structural approach in which these are determined using bespoke models built on the underlying risk drivers and dynamics. For retail mis-selling, the frequency distribution is constructed using a Bayesian network, while the severity distribution is constructed using system dynamics. This has not been used to date in driver-based models for operational risk. In using system dynamics, with elements of queuing theory and multi-objective optimization, this paper advocates a versatile attitude with regard to modeling by ensuring the model is appropriately representative of the scenario in question. The constructed model is thereafter applied to a specific and currently relevant scenario involving packaged bank accounts, and illustrative capital estimates are determined. This paper finds that using structural models could provide a more risk-sensitive alternative to using loss data or expert opinion in scenario-level risk quantification. Further, these models could be exploited for a variety of risk management uses, such as the assessment of control efficacy and operational and resource planning.
期刊介绍:
In December 2017, the Basel Committee published the final version of its standardized measurement approach (SMA) methodology, which will replace the approaches set out in Basel II (ie, the simpler standardized approaches and advanced measurement approach (AMA) that allowed use of internal models) from January 1, 2022. Independently of the Basel III rules, in order to manage and mitigate risks, they still need to be measurable by anyone. The operational risk industry needs to keep that in mind. While the purpose of the now defunct AMA was to find out the level of regulatory capital to protect a firm against operational risks, we still can – and should – use models to estimate operational risk economic capital. Without these, the task of managing and mitigating capital would be incredibly difficult. These internal models are now unshackled from regulatory requirements and can be optimized for managing the daily risks to which financial institutions are exposed. In addition, operational risk models can and should be used for stress tests and Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). The Journal of Operational Risk also welcomes papers on nonfinancial risks as well as topics including, but not limited to, the following. The modeling and management of operational risk. Recent advances in techniques used to model operational risk, eg, copulas, correlation, aggregate loss distributions, Bayesian methods and extreme value theory. The pricing and hedging of operational risk and/or any risk transfer techniques. Data modeling external loss data, business control factors and scenario analysis. Models used to aggregate different types of data. Causal models that link key risk indicators and macroeconomic factors to operational losses. Regulatory issues, such as Basel II or any other local regulatory issue. Enterprise risk management. Cyber risk. Big data.