硫芥(SM)皮肤损伤7天小鼠模型研究

Michael C. Babin, K. M. Ricketts, R. C. Kiser, M. Gazaway, Nathaniel Krogel, L. W. Mitcheltree, Danielle M. Moore, K. Skvorak, R. Sweeney, I. Koplovitz, R. Casillas
{"title":"硫芥(SM)皮肤损伤7天小鼠模型研究","authors":"Michael C. Babin, K. M. Ricketts, R. C. Kiser, M. Gazaway, Nathaniel Krogel, L. W. Mitcheltree, Danielle M. Moore, K. Skvorak, R. Sweeney, I. Koplovitz, R. Casillas","doi":"10.1081/CUS-120026302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mouse ear vesicant model (MEVM) is a screening tool used to identify protective compounds against acute sulfur mustard (SM)‐induced skin injury. It provides endpoints of edema and histopathology 24 h following a topical SM exposure to assess protection against inflammation and tissue damage. To further evaluate successful compounds, the MEVM was modified for use as a 7‐day model. Dose response studies were conducted with SM to select an optimal challenge dose for the new model. Due to severity of SM‐induced tissue damage by Day 7, edema and histopathology were determined unreliable endpoints. Therefore, a modified Draize scoring system (no damage to extensive necrosis) was incorporated as an endpoint to evaluate tissue damage out to Day 7. To aid in optimal SM dose selection, retro synthetic capsaicin (RSCAP), a protective compound in the MEVM, was evaluated as a treatment 15 min before exposure to 0.06, 0.08, and 0.16 mg SM. The RSCAP compound provided similar significant protection at Day 7 against the 0.06‐ (42% reduction) and 0.08‐mg doses (32% reduction), but was not effective against the severely necrotizing 0.16‐mg SM dose. Based on these results, an optimum SM dose of 0.08 mg was selected. Retro synthetic capsaicin and two pharmacologically inactive analogs were tested as topical treatments 15 min prior to SM challenge. The RSCAP compound significantly reduced injury, whereas the inactive analogs had no protective effect. The RSCAP also significantly reduced SM injury when administered topically 10 min after SM challenge. These data support the use of the 7‐day mouse ear vesicant treatment model (MEVTM) in evaluating candidate antivesicant compounds.","PeriodicalId":17547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","volume":"265 1","pages":"231 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 7‐Day Mouse Model to Assess Protection from Sulfur Mustard (SM) Skin Injury\",\"authors\":\"Michael C. Babin, K. M. Ricketts, R. C. Kiser, M. Gazaway, Nathaniel Krogel, L. W. Mitcheltree, Danielle M. Moore, K. Skvorak, R. Sweeney, I. Koplovitz, R. Casillas\",\"doi\":\"10.1081/CUS-120026302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The mouse ear vesicant model (MEVM) is a screening tool used to identify protective compounds against acute sulfur mustard (SM)‐induced skin injury. It provides endpoints of edema and histopathology 24 h following a topical SM exposure to assess protection against inflammation and tissue damage. To further evaluate successful compounds, the MEVM was modified for use as a 7‐day model. Dose response studies were conducted with SM to select an optimal challenge dose for the new model. Due to severity of SM‐induced tissue damage by Day 7, edema and histopathology were determined unreliable endpoints. Therefore, a modified Draize scoring system (no damage to extensive necrosis) was incorporated as an endpoint to evaluate tissue damage out to Day 7. To aid in optimal SM dose selection, retro synthetic capsaicin (RSCAP), a protective compound in the MEVM, was evaluated as a treatment 15 min before exposure to 0.06, 0.08, and 0.16 mg SM. The RSCAP compound provided similar significant protection at Day 7 against the 0.06‐ (42% reduction) and 0.08‐mg doses (32% reduction), but was not effective against the severely necrotizing 0.16‐mg SM dose. Based on these results, an optimum SM dose of 0.08 mg was selected. Retro synthetic capsaicin and two pharmacologically inactive analogs were tested as topical treatments 15 min prior to SM challenge. The RSCAP compound significantly reduced injury, whereas the inactive analogs had no protective effect. The RSCAP also significantly reduced SM injury when administered topically 10 min after SM challenge. These data support the use of the 7‐day mouse ear vesicant treatment model (MEVTM) in evaluating candidate antivesicant compounds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"265 1\",\"pages\":\"231 - 242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1081/CUS-120026302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1081/CUS-120026302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

小鼠耳泡剂模型(MEVM)是一种筛选工具,用于鉴定抗急性硫芥(SM)诱导的皮肤损伤的保护性化合物。它提供了局部SM暴露24小时后水肿和组织病理学的终点,以评估对炎症和组织损伤的保护。为了进一步评估成功的化合物,MEVM被修改为7天的模型。用SM进行剂量反应研究,以选择新模型的最佳激发剂量。由于SM诱导的组织损伤在第7天的严重程度,水肿和组织病理学被确定为不可靠的终点。因此,采用改良的Draize评分系统(无大面积坏死损伤)作为评估第7天组织损伤的终点。为了帮助选择最佳的SM剂量,在暴露于0.06、0.08和0.16 mg SM前15分钟评估了MEVM中的保护性化合物retro synthetic capsaicin (RSCAP)。在第7天,RSCAP化合物对0.06‐(减少42%)和0.08‐mg剂量(减少32%)提供了类似的显著保护,但对严重坏死性0.16‐mg SM剂量无效。在此基础上,确定了SM的最佳剂量为0.08 mg。复古合成辣椒素和两种药理上无活性的类似物在SM攻击前15分钟作为局部治疗进行测试。RSCAP化合物显著减轻损伤,而无活性类似物无保护作用。在SM攻击后10分钟局部施用RSCAP也能显著减少SM损伤。这些数据支持使用7天小鼠耳泡剂治疗模型(MEVTM)来评估候选抗泡剂化合物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A 7‐Day Mouse Model to Assess Protection from Sulfur Mustard (SM) Skin Injury
The mouse ear vesicant model (MEVM) is a screening tool used to identify protective compounds against acute sulfur mustard (SM)‐induced skin injury. It provides endpoints of edema and histopathology 24 h following a topical SM exposure to assess protection against inflammation and tissue damage. To further evaluate successful compounds, the MEVM was modified for use as a 7‐day model. Dose response studies were conducted with SM to select an optimal challenge dose for the new model. Due to severity of SM‐induced tissue damage by Day 7, edema and histopathology were determined unreliable endpoints. Therefore, a modified Draize scoring system (no damage to extensive necrosis) was incorporated as an endpoint to evaluate tissue damage out to Day 7. To aid in optimal SM dose selection, retro synthetic capsaicin (RSCAP), a protective compound in the MEVM, was evaluated as a treatment 15 min before exposure to 0.06, 0.08, and 0.16 mg SM. The RSCAP compound provided similar significant protection at Day 7 against the 0.06‐ (42% reduction) and 0.08‐mg doses (32% reduction), but was not effective against the severely necrotizing 0.16‐mg SM dose. Based on these results, an optimum SM dose of 0.08 mg was selected. Retro synthetic capsaicin and two pharmacologically inactive analogs were tested as topical treatments 15 min prior to SM challenge. The RSCAP compound significantly reduced injury, whereas the inactive analogs had no protective effect. The RSCAP also significantly reduced SM injury when administered topically 10 min after SM challenge. These data support the use of the 7‐day mouse ear vesicant treatment model (MEVTM) in evaluating candidate antivesicant compounds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信