瑞士法语语料库中clitic主题的变化状态:sms4science的比较。ch和OFROM

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
REVUE ROMANE Pub Date : 2020-03-02 DOI:10.1075/RRO.16020.ROB
Aurélia Robert-Tissot
{"title":"瑞士法语语料库中clitic主题的变化状态:sms4science的比较。ch和OFROM","authors":"Aurélia Robert-Tissot","doi":"10.1075/RRO.16020.ROB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution proposes a comparative analysis of two corpora containing informal and more formal Swiss French: a written corpus\nof text messages and a corpus of spoken French. We test two hypotheses based on recent approaches to language variation in French.\nFirstly, we challenge Koch & Oesterreicher’s (2011) model, which denies an influence\nof the code of a message on its linguistic form, giving precedence to its conception. We show that there are differences between\nthe corpora that are partially induced by the code of the message, i.e. the possibility of dropping the referential subject.\nSecondly, there are indications in favour of the hypothesis which states that clitic subjects in informal French have to be\nanalysed as agreement markers rather than as proper arguments of the verb (cf. e.g. Culbertson\n2010 , among many others). We conclude by proposing that there is a difference between written and spoken language in\nnon-standard varieties.","PeriodicalId":42193,"journal":{"name":"REVUE ROMANE","volume":"6 1","pages":"34-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le statut variationnel du sujet clitique dans deux corpus de la Suisse romande: Une comparaison entre sms4science.ch et OFROM\",\"authors\":\"Aurélia Robert-Tissot\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/RRO.16020.ROB\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This contribution proposes a comparative analysis of two corpora containing informal and more formal Swiss French: a written corpus\\nof text messages and a corpus of spoken French. We test two hypotheses based on recent approaches to language variation in French.\\nFirstly, we challenge Koch & Oesterreicher’s (2011) model, which denies an influence\\nof the code of a message on its linguistic form, giving precedence to its conception. We show that there are differences between\\nthe corpora that are partially induced by the code of the message, i.e. the possibility of dropping the referential subject.\\nSecondly, there are indications in favour of the hypothesis which states that clitic subjects in informal French have to be\\nanalysed as agreement markers rather than as proper arguments of the verb (cf. e.g. Culbertson\\n2010 , among many others). We conclude by proposing that there is a difference between written and spoken language in\\nnon-standard varieties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVUE ROMANE\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"34-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVUE ROMANE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/RRO.16020.ROB\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVUE ROMANE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/RRO.16020.ROB","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一贡献提出了一个比较分析的两个语料库包含非正式和更正式的瑞士法语:文本信息的书面语料库和法语口语语料库。我们基于最近对法语语言变异的研究来检验两个假设。首先,我们挑战Koch & Oesterreicher(2011)的模型,该模型否认信息的代码对其语言形式的影响,优先考虑其概念。我们发现语料库之间的差异部分是由信息的代码引起的,即省略参考主语的可能性。其次,有迹象表明,非正式法语中的clitic主语必须作为协议标记而不是动词的适当论证来分析(参见Culbertson2010等许多人)。我们的结论是,书面语言和口语之间存在非标准变体的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Le statut variationnel du sujet clitique dans deux corpus de la Suisse romande: Une comparaison entre sms4science.ch et OFROM
This contribution proposes a comparative analysis of two corpora containing informal and more formal Swiss French: a written corpus of text messages and a corpus of spoken French. We test two hypotheses based on recent approaches to language variation in French. Firstly, we challenge Koch & Oesterreicher’s (2011) model, which denies an influence of the code of a message on its linguistic form, giving precedence to its conception. We show that there are differences between the corpora that are partially induced by the code of the message, i.e. the possibility of dropping the referential subject. Secondly, there are indications in favour of the hypothesis which states that clitic subjects in informal French have to be analysed as agreement markers rather than as proper arguments of the verb (cf. e.g. Culbertson 2010 , among many others). We conclude by proposing that there is a difference between written and spoken language in non-standard varieties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REVUE ROMANE
REVUE ROMANE Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信