[高效液相色谱-串联质谱法快速、同时测定土壤中的草甘膦、草胺膦及其代谢物]。

IF 1.6 4区 农林科学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Hua Ping, Fang Zhao, Cheng Li, Beihong Wang, Hongling Kong, Yang Li, Zhihong Ma
{"title":"[高效液相色谱-串联质谱法快速、同时测定土壤中的草甘膦、草胺膦及其代谢物]。","authors":"Hua Ping, Fang Zhao, Cheng Li, Beihong Wang, Hongling Kong, Yang Li, Zhihong Ma","doi":"10.3724/SP.J.1123.2021.08005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glyphosate (GLY) and glufosinate (GLUF) are non-selective translocated herbicides that are used in agricultural and non-agricultural land worldwide. The extensive use of GLY and GLUF may lead to their accumulation in soil, which causes soil pollution and affects the soil micro-ecological environment; the accumulated GLY and GLUF also migrate to groundwater via leaching. However, GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites are highly water-soluble and lack chromogenic and fluorescent groups, making them difficult to analyze. Currently, derivatization methods are mostly used to detect GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites. However, these methods also have some drawbacks, such as complex operation, long time consumption, and poor stability. In addition, these compounds are easily passivated and made inactive in soil; they also react with organic matter, humic acid, metal oxides, and heavy metal ions, making their extraction from soil difficult. To date, the method for the determination of GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites in soil is limited. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a quick and sensitive method to determine the residues of GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites in soil. In this study, a high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method was developed for the determination of GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites in soil. Parameters like extraction solvent, extraction temperature, extraction time, and adsorbents, which affected the extraction efficiencies, were optimized. Finally, the soil samples were extracted with 0.5 mol/L ammonia solution in a bath shaker at 50 ℃, and then centrifuged at 10000 r/min for 5 min. The supernatant was filtered through 0.2-μm syringe filters and then determined by HPLC-MS/MS. A Dikma Polyamino HILIC column (150 mm×2.0 mm, 5 μm) was used for chromatographic separation with good peak shape and high response of the target compounds. Ammonium acetate (0.2 mmol/L) with 0.07% ammonia aqueous solution and acetonitrile were used as the mobile phase. The flow rate of the elute was 0.25 mL/min. MS/MS was conducted under multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using an electrospray ionization (ESI) source, and was quantified by the external standard method using matrix-matched calibration curves. All the target compounds were ionized in the negative ionization mode. The linear ranges of GLY and its metabolites were between 5.0 and 500 μg/L, and those of GLUF and its metabolites were between 2.0 and 500 μg/L. Linear correlation coefficients were greater than 0.99. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were assessed using signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios of 3 and 10, respectively. The LOD and LOQ values of both GLY and (aminomethyl)phosphonic acid (AMPA) were 4.0 and 13.3 μg/kg, respectively. The LOD and LOQ values of GLUF, MPP, and N-acetyl glufosinate (NAG) were 2.0 and 6.7 μg/kg, respectively. Method accuracy was acquired by recovery test at three spiked levels (0.02, 0.05, 0.2 mg/kg). The average recoveries of five targets spiked in soil with low organic matter content were 74.2%-101%, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) was 0.93%-6.8%; the average recoveries of the five targets spiked in soil with high organic matter content were 90.8%-116%, and the RSD was 0.40%-7.1%. The established method was used to determine 20 soil samples in peach orchard, and the detection rates of AMPA, GLY, MPP, GLUF and NAG were 45%, 25%, 10%, 5% and 5%, respectively. The maximum residues were 147, 35.2, 154, 21.6 and 11.0 μg/kg, respectively. This method is simple, rapid, green, inexpensive, allows pretreatment without organic reagents, and affords high accuracy, high sensitivity, and good reproducibility. The method is suitable for testing a large number of soil samples with different organic matter contents. It can provide reliable technical support for the study of residue status and environmental behavior in soil.</p>","PeriodicalId":12245,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Agriculture","volume":"31 1","pages":"273-280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Rapid and simultaneous determination of glyphosate, glufosinate, and their metabolites in soil by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].\",\"authors\":\"Hua Ping, Fang Zhao, Cheng Li, Beihong Wang, Hongling Kong, Yang Li, Zhihong Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.3724/SP.J.1123.2021.08005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Glyphosate (GLY) and glufosinate (GLUF) are non-selective translocated herbicides that are used in agricultural and non-agricultural land worldwide. The extensive use of GLY and GLUF may lead to their accumulation in soil, which causes soil pollution and affects the soil micro-ecological environment; the accumulated GLY and GLUF also migrate to groundwater via leaching. However, GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites are highly water-soluble and lack chromogenic and fluorescent groups, making them difficult to analyze. Currently, derivatization methods are mostly used to detect GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites. However, these methods also have some drawbacks, such as complex operation, long time consumption, and poor stability. In addition, these compounds are easily passivated and made inactive in soil; they also react with organic matter, humic acid, metal oxides, and heavy metal ions, making their extraction from soil difficult. To date, the method for the determination of GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites in soil is limited. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a quick and sensitive method to determine the residues of GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites in soil. In this study, a high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method was developed for the determination of GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites in soil. Parameters like extraction solvent, extraction temperature, extraction time, and adsorbents, which affected the extraction efficiencies, were optimized. Finally, the soil samples were extracted with 0.5 mol/L ammonia solution in a bath shaker at 50 ℃, and then centrifuged at 10000 r/min for 5 min. The supernatant was filtered through 0.2-μm syringe filters and then determined by HPLC-MS/MS. A Dikma Polyamino HILIC column (150 mm×2.0 mm, 5 μm) was used for chromatographic separation with good peak shape and high response of the target compounds. Ammonium acetate (0.2 mmol/L) with 0.07% ammonia aqueous solution and acetonitrile were used as the mobile phase. The flow rate of the elute was 0.25 mL/min. MS/MS was conducted under multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using an electrospray ionization (ESI) source, and was quantified by the external standard method using matrix-matched calibration curves. All the target compounds were ionized in the negative ionization mode. The linear ranges of GLY and its metabolites were between 5.0 and 500 μg/L, and those of GLUF and its metabolites were between 2.0 and 500 μg/L. Linear correlation coefficients were greater than 0.99. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were assessed using signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios of 3 and 10, respectively. The LOD and LOQ values of both GLY and (aminomethyl)phosphonic acid (AMPA) were 4.0 and 13.3 μg/kg, respectively. The LOD and LOQ values of GLUF, MPP, and N-acetyl glufosinate (NAG) were 2.0 and 6.7 μg/kg, respectively. Method accuracy was acquired by recovery test at three spiked levels (0.02, 0.05, 0.2 mg/kg). The average recoveries of five targets spiked in soil with low organic matter content were 74.2%-101%, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) was 0.93%-6.8%; the average recoveries of the five targets spiked in soil with high organic matter content were 90.8%-116%, and the RSD was 0.40%-7.1%. The established method was used to determine 20 soil samples in peach orchard, and the detection rates of AMPA, GLY, MPP, GLUF and NAG were 45%, 25%, 10%, 5% and 5%, respectively. The maximum residues were 147, 35.2, 154, 21.6 and 11.0 μg/kg, respectively. This method is simple, rapid, green, inexpensive, allows pretreatment without organic reagents, and affords high accuracy, high sensitivity, and good reproducibility. The method is suitable for testing a large number of soil samples with different organic matter contents. It can provide reliable technical support for the study of residue status and environmental behavior in soil.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"273-280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404154/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2021.08005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2021.08005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

草甘膦(glly)和草甘膦(GLUF)是世界范围内用于农业和非农业土地的非选择性易位除草剂。GLY和GLUF的大量使用可能导致其在土壤中积累,造成土壤污染,影响土壤微生态环境;累积的GLY和GLUF也通过淋滤向地下水迁移。然而,GLY、GLUF及其代谢产物是高度水溶性的,缺乏显色和荧光基团,使其难以分析。目前,衍生化方法主要用于检测GLY、GLUF及其代谢物。但这些方法也存在操作复杂、耗时长、稳定性差等缺点。此外,这些化合物在土壤中很容易钝化和失去活性;它们还与有机物、腐植酸、金属氧化物和重金属离子发生反应,使它们难以从土壤中提取出来。迄今为止,测定土壤中GLY、GLUF及其代谢物的方法是有限的。因此,有必要建立一种快速灵敏的方法来测定土壤中GLY、GLUF及其代谢物的残留量。本研究建立了高效液相色谱-串联质谱(HPLC-MS/MS)测定土壤中GLY、GLUF及其代谢物的方法。对萃取溶剂、萃取温度、萃取时间、吸附剂等影响萃取效率的参数进行了优化。最后,用0.5 mol/L氨溶液在50℃浴摇床中提取土壤样品,以10000 r/min离心5 min,上清经0.2 μm注射器过滤器过滤后,采用HPLC-MS/MS测定。采用Dikma Polyamino HILIC色谱柱(150 mm×2.0 mm, 5 μm)进行色谱分离,峰形好,对目标化合物的响应高。以0.2 mmol/L的乙酸铵与0.07%的氨水溶液和乙腈为流动相。洗脱液流速0.25 mL/min。采用电喷雾电离(ESI)源在多反应监测(MRM)模式下进行质谱分析,采用基质匹配校准曲线外标法定量。所有目标化合物均以负电离模式电离。GLY及其代谢物的线性范围在5.0 ~ 500 μg/L之间,GLUF及其代谢物的线性范围在2.0 ~ 500 μg/L之间。线性相关系数大于0.99。检测限(LOD)和定量限(LOQ)分别采用3和10的信噪比进行评估。GLY和(氨基甲基)膦酸(AMPA)的LOD和LOQ值分别为4.0和13.3 μg/kg。glf、MPP和n -乙酰草甘膦(NAG)的LOD和LOQ值分别为2.0和6.7 μg/kg。方法在3个加标水平(0.02、0.05、0.2 mg/kg)下进行回收率试验,准确度较高。5种标靶在低有机质土壤中的平均加标回收率为74.2% ~ 101%,相对标准偏差(RSD)为0.93% ~ 6.8%;5种标靶在高有机质土壤中的平均加标回收率为90.8% ~ 116%,RSD为0.40% ~ 7.1%。采用所建立的方法对20个桃园土壤样品进行检测,AMPA、GLY、MPP、GLUF和NAG的检出率分别为45%、25%、10%、5%和5%。最大残留量分别为147、35.2、154、21.6和11.0 μg/kg。该方法简便、快速、绿色环保、价格低廉,预处理无需有机试剂,准确度高、灵敏度高、重现性好。该方法适用于大量不同有机质含量土壤样品的检测。可为土壤中残留状况和环境行为的研究提供可靠的技术支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Rapid and simultaneous determination of glyphosate, glufosinate, and their metabolites in soil by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].

Glyphosate (GLY) and glufosinate (GLUF) are non-selective translocated herbicides that are used in agricultural and non-agricultural land worldwide. The extensive use of GLY and GLUF may lead to their accumulation in soil, which causes soil pollution and affects the soil micro-ecological environment; the accumulated GLY and GLUF also migrate to groundwater via leaching. However, GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites are highly water-soluble and lack chromogenic and fluorescent groups, making them difficult to analyze. Currently, derivatization methods are mostly used to detect GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites. However, these methods also have some drawbacks, such as complex operation, long time consumption, and poor stability. In addition, these compounds are easily passivated and made inactive in soil; they also react with organic matter, humic acid, metal oxides, and heavy metal ions, making their extraction from soil difficult. To date, the method for the determination of GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites in soil is limited. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a quick and sensitive method to determine the residues of GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites in soil. In this study, a high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method was developed for the determination of GLY, GLUF, and their metabolites in soil. Parameters like extraction solvent, extraction temperature, extraction time, and adsorbents, which affected the extraction efficiencies, were optimized. Finally, the soil samples were extracted with 0.5 mol/L ammonia solution in a bath shaker at 50 ℃, and then centrifuged at 10000 r/min for 5 min. The supernatant was filtered through 0.2-μm syringe filters and then determined by HPLC-MS/MS. A Dikma Polyamino HILIC column (150 mm×2.0 mm, 5 μm) was used for chromatographic separation with good peak shape and high response of the target compounds. Ammonium acetate (0.2 mmol/L) with 0.07% ammonia aqueous solution and acetonitrile were used as the mobile phase. The flow rate of the elute was 0.25 mL/min. MS/MS was conducted under multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using an electrospray ionization (ESI) source, and was quantified by the external standard method using matrix-matched calibration curves. All the target compounds were ionized in the negative ionization mode. The linear ranges of GLY and its metabolites were between 5.0 and 500 μg/L, and those of GLUF and its metabolites were between 2.0 and 500 μg/L. Linear correlation coefficients were greater than 0.99. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were assessed using signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios of 3 and 10, respectively. The LOD and LOQ values of both GLY and (aminomethyl)phosphonic acid (AMPA) were 4.0 and 13.3 μg/kg, respectively. The LOD and LOQ values of GLUF, MPP, and N-acetyl glufosinate (NAG) were 2.0 and 6.7 μg/kg, respectively. Method accuracy was acquired by recovery test at three spiked levels (0.02, 0.05, 0.2 mg/kg). The average recoveries of five targets spiked in soil with low organic matter content were 74.2%-101%, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) was 0.93%-6.8%; the average recoveries of the five targets spiked in soil with high organic matter content were 90.8%-116%, and the RSD was 0.40%-7.1%. The established method was used to determine 20 soil samples in peach orchard, and the detection rates of AMPA, GLY, MPP, GLUF and NAG were 45%, 25%, 10%, 5% and 5%, respectively. The maximum residues were 147, 35.2, 154, 21.6 and 11.0 μg/kg, respectively. This method is simple, rapid, green, inexpensive, allows pretreatment without organic reagents, and affords high accuracy, high sensitivity, and good reproducibility. The method is suitable for testing a large number of soil samples with different organic matter contents. It can provide reliable technical support for the study of residue status and environmental behavior in soil.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Agriculture
Experimental Agriculture 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: With a focus on the tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world, Experimental Agriculture publishes the results of original research on field, plantation and herbage crops grown for food or feed, or for industrial purposes, and on farming systems, including livestock and people. It reports experimental work designed to explain how crops respond to the environment in biological and physical terms, and on the social and economic issues that may influence the uptake of the results of research by policy makers and farmers, including the role of institutions and partnerships in delivering impact. The journal also publishes accounts and critical discussions of new quantitative and qualitative methods in agricultural and ecosystems research, and of contemporary issues arising in countries where agricultural production needs to develop rapidly. There is a regular book review section and occasional, often invited, reviews of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信