N. S. Kwong, K. Jaiswal, J. Baker, N. Luco, K. Ludwig, Vasey J. Stephens
{"title":"美国邻近地区天然气管道的地震风险及其不确定性来源","authors":"N. S. Kwong, K. Jaiswal, J. Baker, N. Luco, K. Ludwig, Vasey J. Stephens","doi":"10.1061/ajrua6.0001202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relatively little research has been conducted to systematically quantify the nationwide earthquake risk of gas pipelines in the United States; simultaneously, national guidance is limited for operators across the country to consistently evaluate earthquake risk of their assets. Furthermore, many challenges and uncertainties exist in a comprehensive seismic risk assessment of gas pipelines. As a first stage in a systematic nationwide assessment, we quantify the earthquake risk of gas transmission pipelines in the conterminous United States due to strong ground shaking, including the associated uncertainties. Specifically, we integrate the U.S. Geological Survey 2018 National Seismic Hazard Model, a logic tree-based exposure model, three different vulnerability models, and a consequence model. The results enable comparison against other risk assessment efforts, encourage more transparent deliberation regarding alternative approaches, and facilitate decisions on potentially assessing localized risks due to ground failures that require site-specific data. Based on the uncertainties approximated herein, the resulting sensitivity analyses suggest that the vulnerability model is the most influential source of uncertainty. Finally, we highlight research needs such as (i) developing more vulnerability models for regional seismic risk assessment of gas pipelines, (ii) identifying, prioritizing, and measuring input pipeline attributes that are important for estimating seismic damage, and (iii) better quantifying seismic hazards with their uncertainties at the national scale, for both ground failures and ground shaking.","PeriodicalId":48571,"journal":{"name":"Asce-Asme Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A-Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Earthquake Risk of Gas Pipelines in the Conterminous United States and Its Sources of Uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"N. S. Kwong, K. Jaiswal, J. Baker, N. Luco, K. Ludwig, Vasey J. Stephens\",\"doi\":\"10.1061/ajrua6.0001202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relatively little research has been conducted to systematically quantify the nationwide earthquake risk of gas pipelines in the United States; simultaneously, national guidance is limited for operators across the country to consistently evaluate earthquake risk of their assets. Furthermore, many challenges and uncertainties exist in a comprehensive seismic risk assessment of gas pipelines. As a first stage in a systematic nationwide assessment, we quantify the earthquake risk of gas transmission pipelines in the conterminous United States due to strong ground shaking, including the associated uncertainties. Specifically, we integrate the U.S. Geological Survey 2018 National Seismic Hazard Model, a logic tree-based exposure model, three different vulnerability models, and a consequence model. The results enable comparison against other risk assessment efforts, encourage more transparent deliberation regarding alternative approaches, and facilitate decisions on potentially assessing localized risks due to ground failures that require site-specific data. Based on the uncertainties approximated herein, the resulting sensitivity analyses suggest that the vulnerability model is the most influential source of uncertainty. Finally, we highlight research needs such as (i) developing more vulnerability models for regional seismic risk assessment of gas pipelines, (ii) identifying, prioritizing, and measuring input pipeline attributes that are important for estimating seismic damage, and (iii) better quantifying seismic hazards with their uncertainties at the national scale, for both ground failures and ground shaking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asce-Asme Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A-Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asce-Asme Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A-Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.0001202\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asce-Asme Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A-Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.0001202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Earthquake Risk of Gas Pipelines in the Conterminous United States and Its Sources of Uncertainty
Relatively little research has been conducted to systematically quantify the nationwide earthquake risk of gas pipelines in the United States; simultaneously, national guidance is limited for operators across the country to consistently evaluate earthquake risk of their assets. Furthermore, many challenges and uncertainties exist in a comprehensive seismic risk assessment of gas pipelines. As a first stage in a systematic nationwide assessment, we quantify the earthquake risk of gas transmission pipelines in the conterminous United States due to strong ground shaking, including the associated uncertainties. Specifically, we integrate the U.S. Geological Survey 2018 National Seismic Hazard Model, a logic tree-based exposure model, three different vulnerability models, and a consequence model. The results enable comparison against other risk assessment efforts, encourage more transparent deliberation regarding alternative approaches, and facilitate decisions on potentially assessing localized risks due to ground failures that require site-specific data. Based on the uncertainties approximated herein, the resulting sensitivity analyses suggest that the vulnerability model is the most influential source of uncertainty. Finally, we highlight research needs such as (i) developing more vulnerability models for regional seismic risk assessment of gas pipelines, (ii) identifying, prioritizing, and measuring input pipeline attributes that are important for estimating seismic damage, and (iii) better quantifying seismic hazards with their uncertainties at the national scale, for both ground failures and ground shaking.
期刊介绍:
The journal will meet the needs of the researchers and engineers to address risk, disaster and failure-related challenges due to many sources and types of uncertainty in planning, design, analysis, construction, manufacturing, operation, utilization, and life-cycle management of existing and new engineering systems. Challenges abound due to increasing complexity of engineering systems, new materials and concepts, and emerging hazards (both natural and human caused). The journal will serve as a medium for dissemination of research findings, best practices and concerns, and for the discussion and debate on risk and uncertainty related issues. The journal will report on the full range of risk and uncertainty analysis state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice relating to civil and mechanical engineering including but not limited to:
• Risk quantification based on hazard identification,
• Scenario development and rate quantification,
• Consequence assessment,
• Valuations, perception, and communication,
• Risk-informed decision making,
• Uncertainty analysis and modeling,
• Other related areas.
Part A of the journal, published by the American Society of Civil Engineers, will focus on the civil engineering aspects of these topics. Part B will be published by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers focusing on mechanical engineering.