{"title":"回答阿卡姆的意识形态指控","authors":"Abdul Wadud Kasful Humam","doi":"10.47454/itqan.v6i2.689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the answer of Abdul Ilāh Ḥūri to the accusation of ideologization in tafsīr ayāt aḥkām (Qur’anic exegesis on the legal verses) through his work Asbāb Ikhtilāf al-Mufassirīn fī Tafsīr Ᾱyāt al-Aḥkām. The tendency to ideologize these schools of tafsīr can be understood not only because of the writer's background as a demonstrative school activist, but other factors are also very influential on the resulting tafsīr ayāt aḥkām products, such as: differences in using the rules of al-'ibrah bi 'umūm al-lafẓi lā bi khuṣūṣ al-sabab or vice versa, differences in choosing qirā'at, differences in interpreting siyāq (context) or in his term that is called mā fī al-Qur'ān and mā ḥaula al-Qur'ān.\nKeywords: Qur’anic exegesis on the legal verses, school ideology, mā fī al-Qur'ān, and mā ḥaula al-Qur'ān.","PeriodicalId":53103,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Studi AlQuran","volume":"361 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MENJAWAB TUDUHAN IDEOLOGISASI DALAM TAFSIR AHKAM\",\"authors\":\"Abdul Wadud Kasful Humam\",\"doi\":\"10.47454/itqan.v6i2.689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the answer of Abdul Ilāh Ḥūri to the accusation of ideologization in tafsīr ayāt aḥkām (Qur’anic exegesis on the legal verses) through his work Asbāb Ikhtilāf al-Mufassirīn fī Tafsīr Ᾱyāt al-Aḥkām. The tendency to ideologize these schools of tafsīr can be understood not only because of the writer's background as a demonstrative school activist, but other factors are also very influential on the resulting tafsīr ayāt aḥkām products, such as: differences in using the rules of al-'ibrah bi 'umūm al-lafẓi lā bi khuṣūṣ al-sabab or vice versa, differences in choosing qirā'at, differences in interpreting siyāq (context) or in his term that is called mā fī al-Qur'ān and mā ḥaula al-Qur'ān.\\nKeywords: Qur’anic exegesis on the legal verses, school ideology, mā fī al-Qur'ān, and mā ḥaula al-Qur'ān.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Studi AlQuran\",\"volume\":\"361 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Studi AlQuran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47454/itqan.v6i2.689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Studi AlQuran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47454/itqan.v6i2.689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文通过阿卜杜勒Ilāh Ḥūri的著作Asbāb Ikhtilāf al- mufassir n f ā tafs rᾹyāt al-Aḥkām,考察阿卜杜勒Ilāh Ḥūri对tafs r ayāt aḥkām(古兰经律经训诂)中意识形态化的指责的回答。这些tafs ā r学派的意识形态化倾向不仅可以理解,因为作者的背景是一个证明性的学校活动家,但其他因素也对最终的tafs ā r ayāt aḥkām产品有很大的影响,例如:使用al-'ibrah bi 'umūm al-lafẓi lā bi khuṣūṣ al-sabab的规则的差异,反之亦然,选择qirir 'at的差异,解释siyāq(语境)的差异,或在他的术语中称为mā f ' al- qur 'ān和mā ḥaula al- qur 'ān。关键词:《古兰经》律经训诂,学派思想,《古兰经》ān,《古兰经》ān
This article examines the answer of Abdul Ilāh Ḥūri to the accusation of ideologization in tafsīr ayāt aḥkām (Qur’anic exegesis on the legal verses) through his work Asbāb Ikhtilāf al-Mufassirīn fī Tafsīr Ᾱyāt al-Aḥkām. The tendency to ideologize these schools of tafsīr can be understood not only because of the writer's background as a demonstrative school activist, but other factors are also very influential on the resulting tafsīr ayāt aḥkām products, such as: differences in using the rules of al-'ibrah bi 'umūm al-lafẓi lā bi khuṣūṣ al-sabab or vice versa, differences in choosing qirā'at, differences in interpreting siyāq (context) or in his term that is called mā fī al-Qur'ān and mā ḥaula al-Qur'ān.
Keywords: Qur’anic exegesis on the legal verses, school ideology, mā fī al-Qur'ān, and mā ḥaula al-Qur'ān.