{"title":"涂片沉积物组成与定量船上数据的比较:涂片百分比估计效用的案例研究,IODP考察队353,北印度洋","authors":"S. Phillips, K. Littler","doi":"10.5194/sd-30-59-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Smear slide petrography has been a standard technique during scientific ocean drilling expeditions to characterize sediment composition and classify sediment types, but presentation of these percent\nestimates to track downcore trends in sediment composition has become less\nfrequent over the past 2 decades. We compare semi-quantitative smear slide composition estimates to physical property (natural gamma radiation, NGR)\nand solid-phase geochemical (calcium carbonate, CaCO3 %)\nmeasurements from a range of marine depositional environments in the\nnorthern Indian Ocean (Bay of Bengal, Andaman Sea, Ninetyeast Ridge)\ncollected during International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 353. We show that presenting smear slide estimates as percentages, rather\nthan abundance categories, reveals similar downcore variation in composition\nto the more quantitative core analyses. Overall downcore trends in total calcareous components from smear slides (foraminifers + nannofossils +\nshell fragments + authigenic carbonate) follow similar downcore trends to samples measured by CaCO3 coulometry. Total lithogenic components\n(clay + mica + quartz + feldspars + lithic grains + vitric grains\n+ glauconite + heavy minerals + iron oxides) and clay from smear\nslides track reasonably well with NGR measurements. Comparison of site\naverages of absolute percentages of total calcium carbonate from coulometry\nand total calcareous components from smear slide observations reveals an overestimation in carbonate percentages in smear slides (likely due in part\nto underestimation of the clay fraction), especially in sediments rich in smectite clays. Differences in sediment color between sites and settling of\nclay particles during slide preparation may contribute to this discrepancy.\nAlthough smear slide estimates range in accuracy depending on the training\nof the operator, we suggest that sedimentologists describing cores obtained\nduring scientific drilling can use the percent estimates of sedimentary\ncomponents in smear slides to identify trends and cyclicity in marine\nsediment records.\n","PeriodicalId":51840,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Drilling","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of sediment composition by smear slides to quantitative shipboard data: a case study on the utility of smear slide percent estimates, IODP Expedition 353, northern Indian Ocean\",\"authors\":\"S. Phillips, K. Littler\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/sd-30-59-2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Smear slide petrography has been a standard technique during scientific ocean drilling expeditions to characterize sediment composition and classify sediment types, but presentation of these percent\\nestimates to track downcore trends in sediment composition has become less\\nfrequent over the past 2 decades. We compare semi-quantitative smear slide composition estimates to physical property (natural gamma radiation, NGR)\\nand solid-phase geochemical (calcium carbonate, CaCO3 %)\\nmeasurements from a range of marine depositional environments in the\\nnorthern Indian Ocean (Bay of Bengal, Andaman Sea, Ninetyeast Ridge)\\ncollected during International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 353. We show that presenting smear slide estimates as percentages, rather\\nthan abundance categories, reveals similar downcore variation in composition\\nto the more quantitative core analyses. Overall downcore trends in total calcareous components from smear slides (foraminifers + nannofossils +\\nshell fragments + authigenic carbonate) follow similar downcore trends to samples measured by CaCO3 coulometry. Total lithogenic components\\n(clay + mica + quartz + feldspars + lithic grains + vitric grains\\n+ glauconite + heavy minerals + iron oxides) and clay from smear\\nslides track reasonably well with NGR measurements. Comparison of site\\naverages of absolute percentages of total calcium carbonate from coulometry\\nand total calcareous components from smear slide observations reveals an overestimation in carbonate percentages in smear slides (likely due in part\\nto underestimation of the clay fraction), especially in sediments rich in smectite clays. Differences in sediment color between sites and settling of\\nclay particles during slide preparation may contribute to this discrepancy.\\nAlthough smear slide estimates range in accuracy depending on the training\\nof the operator, we suggest that sedimentologists describing cores obtained\\nduring scientific drilling can use the percent estimates of sedimentary\\ncomponents in smear slides to identify trends and cyclicity in marine\\nsediment records.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Drilling\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Drilling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-30-59-2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Drilling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-30-59-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of sediment composition by smear slides to quantitative shipboard data: a case study on the utility of smear slide percent estimates, IODP Expedition 353, northern Indian Ocean
Abstract. Smear slide petrography has been a standard technique during scientific ocean drilling expeditions to characterize sediment composition and classify sediment types, but presentation of these percent
estimates to track downcore trends in sediment composition has become less
frequent over the past 2 decades. We compare semi-quantitative smear slide composition estimates to physical property (natural gamma radiation, NGR)
and solid-phase geochemical (calcium carbonate, CaCO3 %)
measurements from a range of marine depositional environments in the
northern Indian Ocean (Bay of Bengal, Andaman Sea, Ninetyeast Ridge)
collected during International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 353. We show that presenting smear slide estimates as percentages, rather
than abundance categories, reveals similar downcore variation in composition
to the more quantitative core analyses. Overall downcore trends in total calcareous components from smear slides (foraminifers + nannofossils +
shell fragments + authigenic carbonate) follow similar downcore trends to samples measured by CaCO3 coulometry. Total lithogenic components
(clay + mica + quartz + feldspars + lithic grains + vitric grains
+ glauconite + heavy minerals + iron oxides) and clay from smear
slides track reasonably well with NGR measurements. Comparison of site
averages of absolute percentages of total calcium carbonate from coulometry
and total calcareous components from smear slide observations reveals an overestimation in carbonate percentages in smear slides (likely due in part
to underestimation of the clay fraction), especially in sediments rich in smectite clays. Differences in sediment color between sites and settling of
clay particles during slide preparation may contribute to this discrepancy.
Although smear slide estimates range in accuracy depending on the training
of the operator, we suggest that sedimentologists describing cores obtained
during scientific drilling can use the percent estimates of sedimentary
components in smear slides to identify trends and cyclicity in marine
sediment records.