涂片沉积物组成与定量船上数据的比较:涂片百分比估计效用的案例研究,IODP考察队353,北印度洋

IF 1.6 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S. Phillips, K. Littler
{"title":"涂片沉积物组成与定量船上数据的比较:涂片百分比估计效用的案例研究,IODP考察队353,北印度洋","authors":"S. Phillips, K. Littler","doi":"10.5194/sd-30-59-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Smear slide petrography has been a standard technique during scientific ocean drilling expeditions to characterize sediment composition and classify sediment types, but presentation of these percent\nestimates to track downcore trends in sediment composition has become less\nfrequent over the past 2 decades. We compare semi-quantitative smear slide composition estimates to physical property (natural gamma radiation, NGR)\nand solid-phase geochemical (calcium carbonate, CaCO3 %)\nmeasurements from a range of marine depositional environments in the\nnorthern Indian Ocean (Bay of Bengal, Andaman Sea, Ninetyeast Ridge)\ncollected during International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 353. We show that presenting smear slide estimates as percentages, rather\nthan abundance categories, reveals similar downcore variation in composition\nto the more quantitative core analyses. Overall downcore trends in total calcareous components from smear slides (foraminifers + nannofossils +\nshell fragments + authigenic carbonate) follow similar downcore trends to samples measured by CaCO3 coulometry. Total lithogenic components\n(clay + mica + quartz + feldspars + lithic grains + vitric grains\n+ glauconite + heavy minerals + iron oxides) and clay from smear\nslides track reasonably well with NGR measurements. Comparison of site\naverages of absolute percentages of total calcium carbonate from coulometry\nand total calcareous components from smear slide observations reveals an overestimation in carbonate percentages in smear slides (likely due in part\nto underestimation of the clay fraction), especially in sediments rich in smectite clays. Differences in sediment color between sites and settling of\nclay particles during slide preparation may contribute to this discrepancy.\nAlthough smear slide estimates range in accuracy depending on the training\nof the operator, we suggest that sedimentologists describing cores obtained\nduring scientific drilling can use the percent estimates of sedimentary\ncomponents in smear slides to identify trends and cyclicity in marine\nsediment records.\n","PeriodicalId":51840,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Drilling","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of sediment composition by smear slides to quantitative shipboard data: a case study on the utility of smear slide percent estimates, IODP Expedition 353, northern Indian Ocean\",\"authors\":\"S. Phillips, K. Littler\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/sd-30-59-2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Smear slide petrography has been a standard technique during scientific ocean drilling expeditions to characterize sediment composition and classify sediment types, but presentation of these percent\\nestimates to track downcore trends in sediment composition has become less\\nfrequent over the past 2 decades. We compare semi-quantitative smear slide composition estimates to physical property (natural gamma radiation, NGR)\\nand solid-phase geochemical (calcium carbonate, CaCO3 %)\\nmeasurements from a range of marine depositional environments in the\\nnorthern Indian Ocean (Bay of Bengal, Andaman Sea, Ninetyeast Ridge)\\ncollected during International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 353. We show that presenting smear slide estimates as percentages, rather\\nthan abundance categories, reveals similar downcore variation in composition\\nto the more quantitative core analyses. Overall downcore trends in total calcareous components from smear slides (foraminifers + nannofossils +\\nshell fragments + authigenic carbonate) follow similar downcore trends to samples measured by CaCO3 coulometry. Total lithogenic components\\n(clay + mica + quartz + feldspars + lithic grains + vitric grains\\n+ glauconite + heavy minerals + iron oxides) and clay from smear\\nslides track reasonably well with NGR measurements. Comparison of site\\naverages of absolute percentages of total calcium carbonate from coulometry\\nand total calcareous components from smear slide observations reveals an overestimation in carbonate percentages in smear slides (likely due in part\\nto underestimation of the clay fraction), especially in sediments rich in smectite clays. Differences in sediment color between sites and settling of\\nclay particles during slide preparation may contribute to this discrepancy.\\nAlthough smear slide estimates range in accuracy depending on the training\\nof the operator, we suggest that sedimentologists describing cores obtained\\nduring scientific drilling can use the percent estimates of sedimentary\\ncomponents in smear slides to identify trends and cyclicity in marine\\nsediment records.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Drilling\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Drilling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-30-59-2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Drilling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-30-59-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要涂片岩石学一直是科学海洋钻探考察中表征沉积物组成和分类沉积物类型的标准技术,但在过去20年里,用这些百分比估计来追踪沉积物组成的岩芯趋势的频率越来越低。我们将半定量涂片成分估计与物理性质(自然伽马辐射,NGR)和固相地球化学(碳酸钙,CaCO3 %)测量结果进行了比较,这些测量结果来自于国际海洋发现计划(IODP)第353次探险期间收集的北印度洋(孟加拉湾,安达曼海,尼尼特yeast岭)的一系列海洋沉积环境。我们表明,将涂片估计作为百分比,而不是丰度类别,揭示了与更定量的核心分析相似的组成下核变化。涂片(有孔虫+纳米化石+壳碎片+自生碳酸盐)中总钙质组分的总体下核趋势与CaCO3库伦法测量的样品相似。总的造岩成分(粘土+云母+石英+长石+岩屑颗粒+玻璃质颗粒+海绿石+重矿物+氧化铁)和泥屑滑块中的粘土与NGR测量结果相当吻合。库仑法测定的总碳酸钙绝对百分比的现场平均值与涂片观测的总钙质成分的现场平均值的比较表明,涂片中碳酸钙百分比的高估(可能部分是由于对粘土部分的低估),特别是在富含蒙脱石粘土的沉积物中。不同地点之间沉积物颜色的差异以及在玻片制备过程中粘土颗粒的沉降可能导致这种差异。尽管涂片估计的准确性取决于操作者的培训,但我们建议,在科学钻探过程中描述岩心的沉积学家可以使用涂片中沉积成分的百分比估计来确定海洋沉积记录的趋势和周期性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of sediment composition by smear slides to quantitative shipboard data: a case study on the utility of smear slide percent estimates, IODP Expedition 353, northern Indian Ocean
Abstract. Smear slide petrography has been a standard technique during scientific ocean drilling expeditions to characterize sediment composition and classify sediment types, but presentation of these percent estimates to track downcore trends in sediment composition has become less frequent over the past 2 decades. We compare semi-quantitative smear slide composition estimates to physical property (natural gamma radiation, NGR) and solid-phase geochemical (calcium carbonate, CaCO3 %) measurements from a range of marine depositional environments in the northern Indian Ocean (Bay of Bengal, Andaman Sea, Ninetyeast Ridge) collected during International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 353. We show that presenting smear slide estimates as percentages, rather than abundance categories, reveals similar downcore variation in composition to the more quantitative core analyses. Overall downcore trends in total calcareous components from smear slides (foraminifers + nannofossils + shell fragments + authigenic carbonate) follow similar downcore trends to samples measured by CaCO3 coulometry. Total lithogenic components (clay + mica + quartz + feldspars + lithic grains + vitric grains + glauconite + heavy minerals + iron oxides) and clay from smear slides track reasonably well with NGR measurements. Comparison of site averages of absolute percentages of total calcium carbonate from coulometry and total calcareous components from smear slide observations reveals an overestimation in carbonate percentages in smear slides (likely due in part to underestimation of the clay fraction), especially in sediments rich in smectite clays. Differences in sediment color between sites and settling of clay particles during slide preparation may contribute to this discrepancy. Although smear slide estimates range in accuracy depending on the training of the operator, we suggest that sedimentologists describing cores obtained during scientific drilling can use the percent estimates of sedimentary components in smear slides to identify trends and cyclicity in marine sediment records.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Drilling
Scientific Drilling GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信