内镜下椎间盘切除术后的修订:综述

Yusuf Alsharaf, Mohamed Alsaif, Yakub Sayed
{"title":"内镜下椎间盘切除术后的修订:综述","authors":"Yusuf Alsharaf, Mohamed Alsaif, Yakub Sayed","doi":"10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i09/1735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review focuses on the recurrence of lumbar disc herniation after percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (PED) and the revision surgery options available for patients who require further treatment. PED is a minimally invasive surgical technique used to treat herniated discs in the lumbar spine. Although PED has many advantages over traditional open decompression and fusion surgery, recurrent herniation is a common complication that can lead to the need for revision surgery. It will provide insights into strategies for minimizing complications and improving outcomes of post-endoscopic revision discectomy. The goal is to assist clinicians in selecting the most appropriate revision surgery option for their patients based on individual risk factors and other relevant factors. Ultimately, the review aimed to improve patient outcomes and reduce the need for repeat surgery in cases of recurrent herniation following PED. Various surgical techniques have been described for revision procedures, including repeated endoscopic discectomy, open discectomy, minimally invasive microdiscectomy, and fusion. The choice of technique depends on the specific indications and individual patient characteristics. The review will discuss common options for revision surgery, including minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), micro-endoscopic discectomy (MED), and PED. Factors that increase the risk of recurrence after primary PED surgery, such as advanced age, obesity, and Modic changes, will also be discussed. Further research and long-term follow-up studies are warranted to enhance our understanding of the optimal management strategies and outcomes of post-endoscopic discectomy revision.","PeriodicalId":14008,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revision of Post-Endoscopic Discectomy: A Review\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Alsharaf, Mohamed Alsaif, Yakub Sayed\",\"doi\":\"10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i09/1735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review focuses on the recurrence of lumbar disc herniation after percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (PED) and the revision surgery options available for patients who require further treatment. PED is a minimally invasive surgical technique used to treat herniated discs in the lumbar spine. Although PED has many advantages over traditional open decompression and fusion surgery, recurrent herniation is a common complication that can lead to the need for revision surgery. It will provide insights into strategies for minimizing complications and improving outcomes of post-endoscopic revision discectomy. The goal is to assist clinicians in selecting the most appropriate revision surgery option for their patients based on individual risk factors and other relevant factors. Ultimately, the review aimed to improve patient outcomes and reduce the need for repeat surgery in cases of recurrent herniation following PED. Various surgical techniques have been described for revision procedures, including repeated endoscopic discectomy, open discectomy, minimally invasive microdiscectomy, and fusion. The choice of technique depends on the specific indications and individual patient characteristics. The review will discuss common options for revision surgery, including minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), micro-endoscopic discectomy (MED), and PED. Factors that increase the risk of recurrence after primary PED surgery, such as advanced age, obesity, and Modic changes, will also be discussed. Further research and long-term follow-up studies are warranted to enhance our understanding of the optimal management strategies and outcomes of post-endoscopic discectomy revision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i09/1735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i09/1735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述的重点是经皮内窥镜椎间盘切除术(PED)后腰椎间盘突出症的复发以及需要进一步治疗的患者的翻修手术选择。PED是一种用于治疗腰椎椎间盘突出的微创手术技术。尽管PED与传统的开放减压融合手术相比有许多优点,但复发性疝突出是一种常见的并发症,可能导致需要翻修手术。它将为减少并发症和改善内镜翻修椎间盘切除术后的结果提供见解。目的是帮助临床医生根据个体风险因素和其他相关因素为患者选择最合适的翻修手术方案。最终,该综述旨在改善PED后复发性疝患者的预后,减少重复手术的需要。各种手术技术已经被描述为翻修手术,包括重复内镜椎间盘切除术、开放椎间盘切除术、微创微椎间盘切除术和融合。技术的选择取决于具体的适应症和个别患者的特点。本综述将讨论翻修手术的常见选择,包括微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)、显微内镜椎间盘切除术(MED)和PED。增加原发性PED手术后复发风险的因素,如高龄、肥胖和Modic变化,也将被讨论。进一步的研究和长期随访研究是有必要的,以提高我们对内镜下椎间盘切除术后翻修的最佳管理策略和结果的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revision of Post-Endoscopic Discectomy: A Review
This review focuses on the recurrence of lumbar disc herniation after percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (PED) and the revision surgery options available for patients who require further treatment. PED is a minimally invasive surgical technique used to treat herniated discs in the lumbar spine. Although PED has many advantages over traditional open decompression and fusion surgery, recurrent herniation is a common complication that can lead to the need for revision surgery. It will provide insights into strategies for minimizing complications and improving outcomes of post-endoscopic revision discectomy. The goal is to assist clinicians in selecting the most appropriate revision surgery option for their patients based on individual risk factors and other relevant factors. Ultimately, the review aimed to improve patient outcomes and reduce the need for repeat surgery in cases of recurrent herniation following PED. Various surgical techniques have been described for revision procedures, including repeated endoscopic discectomy, open discectomy, minimally invasive microdiscectomy, and fusion. The choice of technique depends on the specific indications and individual patient characteristics. The review will discuss common options for revision surgery, including minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), micro-endoscopic discectomy (MED), and PED. Factors that increase the risk of recurrence after primary PED surgery, such as advanced age, obesity, and Modic changes, will also be discussed. Further research and long-term follow-up studies are warranted to enhance our understanding of the optimal management strategies and outcomes of post-endoscopic discectomy revision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信