模型变量选择的可选检验

N. Mass, P. Senge
{"title":"模型变量选择的可选检验","authors":"N. Mass, P. Senge","doi":"10.1109/TSMC.1978.4309998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper contrasts two approaches to testing the importance of model variables: single-equation statistical tests, such as are used in regression analysis, and model-behavior tests. The paper attempts to show that tests which analyze the impact of individual variables on model behavior are better suited, both theoretically and operationally, to the task of selecting model variables. Conversely, the analysis shows that statistical tests should not be viewed as tests of model specification per se, but as tests of a particular type of data usefulness: they warn the modeler when available data do not permit accurate estimation of a model parameter. However, as a detailed example illustrates, a model relationship may be difficult to estimate yet extremely important for overall behavior. The paper concludes by summarizing two recent applications of model-behavior testing to analyze alternative business-cycle theories and alternative models for capital investment.","PeriodicalId":55006,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B-Cybernetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative Tests for the Selection of Model Variables\",\"authors\":\"N. Mass, P. Senge\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TSMC.1978.4309998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper contrasts two approaches to testing the importance of model variables: single-equation statistical tests, such as are used in regression analysis, and model-behavior tests. The paper attempts to show that tests which analyze the impact of individual variables on model behavior are better suited, both theoretically and operationally, to the task of selecting model variables. Conversely, the analysis shows that statistical tests should not be viewed as tests of model specification per se, but as tests of a particular type of data usefulness: they warn the modeler when available data do not permit accurate estimation of a model parameter. However, as a detailed example illustrates, a model relationship may be difficult to estimate yet extremely important for overall behavior. The paper concludes by summarizing two recent applications of model-behavior testing to analyze alternative business-cycle theories and alternative models for capital investment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B-Cybernetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B-Cybernetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1978.4309998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B-Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1978.4309998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

本文对比了两种检验模型变量重要性的方法:单方程统计检验,如在回归分析中使用的检验和模型行为检验。本文试图表明,分析单个变量对模型行为影响的测试,在理论上和操作上都更适合于选择模型变量的任务。相反,分析表明,统计检验不应被视为对模型规格本身的检验,而应被视为对一种特定类型的数据有用性的检验:当现有数据不允许对模型参数进行准确估计时,统计检验向建模者发出警告。然而,正如一个详细的例子所说明的那样,模型关系可能很难估计,但对整体行为却极其重要。最后总结了模型-行为检验在分析经济周期理论和资本投资模型中的两种最新应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternative Tests for the Selection of Model Variables
This paper contrasts two approaches to testing the importance of model variables: single-equation statistical tests, such as are used in regression analysis, and model-behavior tests. The paper attempts to show that tests which analyze the impact of individual variables on model behavior are better suited, both theoretically and operationally, to the task of selecting model variables. Conversely, the analysis shows that statistical tests should not be viewed as tests of model specification per se, but as tests of a particular type of data usefulness: they warn the modeler when available data do not permit accurate estimation of a model parameter. However, as a detailed example illustrates, a model relationship may be difficult to estimate yet extremely important for overall behavior. The paper concludes by summarizing two recent applications of model-behavior testing to analyze alternative business-cycle theories and alternative models for capital investment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6.0 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信