主动审查文本需求

Vard Antinyan, M. Staron
{"title":"主动审查文本需求","authors":"Vard Antinyan, M. Staron","doi":"10.1109/SANER.2017.7884670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In large software development products the number of textual requirements can reach tens of thousands. When such a large number of requirements is delivered to software developers, there is a risk that vague or complex requirements remain undetected until late in the design process. In order to detect such requirements, companies conduct manual reviews of requirements. Manual reviews, however, take substantial amount of effort, and the efficiency is low. The goal of this paper is to present the application of a method for proactive requirements reviews. The method, that was developed and evaluated in a previous study, is now used in three companies. We show how the method evolved from an isolated scripted use to a fully integrated use in the three companies. The results showed that software engineers in the three companies use the method as a help in their job for continuous improvements of requirements.","PeriodicalId":6541,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)","volume":"32 1","pages":"541-545"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proactive reviews of textual requirements\",\"authors\":\"Vard Antinyan, M. Staron\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SANER.2017.7884670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In large software development products the number of textual requirements can reach tens of thousands. When such a large number of requirements is delivered to software developers, there is a risk that vague or complex requirements remain undetected until late in the design process. In order to detect such requirements, companies conduct manual reviews of requirements. Manual reviews, however, take substantial amount of effort, and the efficiency is low. The goal of this paper is to present the application of a method for proactive requirements reviews. The method, that was developed and evaluated in a previous study, is now used in three companies. We show how the method evolved from an isolated scripted use to a fully integrated use in the three companies. The results showed that software engineers in the three companies use the method as a help in their job for continuous improvements of requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"541-545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2017.7884670\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2017.7884670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在大型软件开发产品中,文本需求的数量可以达到数万个。当如此大量的需求被交付给软件开发人员时,存在一种风险,即模糊或复杂的需求直到设计过程的后期才被发现。为了检测这样的需求,公司对需求进行手工评审。然而,手工评审需要大量的工作,而且效率很低。本文的目标是介绍一种用于前瞻性需求审查的方法的应用。这种方法是在之前的一项研究中开发和评估的,目前在三家公司中使用。我们展示了在这三家公司中,该方法是如何从孤立的脚本使用演变为完全集成的使用的。结果表明,三家公司的软件工程师在工作中使用该方法来帮助持续改进需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proactive reviews of textual requirements
In large software development products the number of textual requirements can reach tens of thousands. When such a large number of requirements is delivered to software developers, there is a risk that vague or complex requirements remain undetected until late in the design process. In order to detect such requirements, companies conduct manual reviews of requirements. Manual reviews, however, take substantial amount of effort, and the efficiency is low. The goal of this paper is to present the application of a method for proactive requirements reviews. The method, that was developed and evaluated in a previous study, is now used in three companies. We show how the method evolved from an isolated scripted use to a fully integrated use in the three companies. The results showed that software engineers in the three companies use the method as a help in their job for continuous improvements of requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信