利用天气、研究和预报耦合模型表征里约热内卢大盆地水库蒸发的空间异质性

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
K. D. Holman, K. Mikkelson, D. Llewellyn
{"title":"利用天气、研究和预报耦合模型表征里约热内卢大盆地水库蒸发的空间异质性","authors":"K. D. Holman, K. Mikkelson, D. Llewellyn","doi":"10.1175/jhm-d-22-0210.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIncreasing evaporative demand from storage reservoirs is aggravating water scarcity issues across the American West. In the Rio Grande Basin, open water evaporation estimates represent approximately one-fifth of all water losses from the Basin. However, most estimates of reservoir evaporation rely on outdated methods, point measurements, or simplistic models. Warming temperatures and increasing atmospheric evaporative demand are stressing over-allocated resources, increasing the need for improved evaporation estimates. In response to this need, we develop open water evaporation estimates at Elephant Butte Reservoir (EBR), New Mexico, using three evaporation models and field measurements. Few studies quantify spatial heterogeneity in evaporation rates across large reservoirs; we therefore focus our efforts on using the Weather, Research, and Forecasting model coupled to an energy budget lake model, WRF-Lake, to simulate evaporation across EBR over the course of two years. We compare results from WRF-Lake, which simulates lake heat storage, to results from the Complementary Relationship Lake Evaporation (CRLE) model and the Global Lake Evaporation Volume dataset (GLEV). Results indicate that monthly and annual evaporation totals from WRF-Lake and GLEV are similar, while CRLE overestimates annual evaporation totals, with monthly peak evaporation offset compared to WRF-Lake and GLEV. While WRF-Lake and GLEV appear to capture monthly and annual evaporation totals, only WRF-Lake simulates differences in evaporation totals across the reservoir surface. Average annual evaporation at EBR was approximately 1487 mm, yet annual totals differed by up to 545 mm depending on location. This study improves understanding of open water evaporation and elucidates limitations of extrapolating point in-situ or bulk evaporation estimates across large reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":15962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","volume":"39 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing Spatial Heterogeneity in Reservoir Evaporation within the Rio Grande Basin using a Coupled Version of the Weather, Research, and Forecasting Model\",\"authors\":\"K. D. Holman, K. Mikkelson, D. Llewellyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/jhm-d-22-0210.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nIncreasing evaporative demand from storage reservoirs is aggravating water scarcity issues across the American West. In the Rio Grande Basin, open water evaporation estimates represent approximately one-fifth of all water losses from the Basin. However, most estimates of reservoir evaporation rely on outdated methods, point measurements, or simplistic models. Warming temperatures and increasing atmospheric evaporative demand are stressing over-allocated resources, increasing the need for improved evaporation estimates. In response to this need, we develop open water evaporation estimates at Elephant Butte Reservoir (EBR), New Mexico, using three evaporation models and field measurements. Few studies quantify spatial heterogeneity in evaporation rates across large reservoirs; we therefore focus our efforts on using the Weather, Research, and Forecasting model coupled to an energy budget lake model, WRF-Lake, to simulate evaporation across EBR over the course of two years. We compare results from WRF-Lake, which simulates lake heat storage, to results from the Complementary Relationship Lake Evaporation (CRLE) model and the Global Lake Evaporation Volume dataset (GLEV). Results indicate that monthly and annual evaporation totals from WRF-Lake and GLEV are similar, while CRLE overestimates annual evaporation totals, with monthly peak evaporation offset compared to WRF-Lake and GLEV. While WRF-Lake and GLEV appear to capture monthly and annual evaporation totals, only WRF-Lake simulates differences in evaporation totals across the reservoir surface. Average annual evaporation at EBR was approximately 1487 mm, yet annual totals differed by up to 545 mm depending on location. This study improves understanding of open water evaporation and elucidates limitations of extrapolating point in-situ or bulk evaporation estimates across large reservoirs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrometeorology\",\"volume\":\"39 5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrometeorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-22-0210.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-22-0210.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水库蒸发需求的增加加剧了整个美国西部的缺水问题。在里奥格兰德盆地,开放水蒸发估计约占该盆地所有水损失的五分之一。然而,大多数对水库蒸发的估计依赖于过时的方法、点测量或简单的模型。升温的气温和不断增加的大气蒸发需求正在给过度分配的资源造成压力,从而增加了改进蒸发估算的需要。针对这一需求,我们利用三种蒸发模型和现场测量结果,在新墨西哥州的大象Butte水库(EBR)开发了开放水域蒸发估算。很少有研究量化大型水库蒸发速率的空间异质性;因此,我们将重点放在使用天气、研究和预报模型与能量收支湖模型WRF-Lake相结合来模拟两年时间内整个EBR的蒸发。我们将模拟湖泊蓄热的WRF-Lake的结果与互补关系湖泊蒸发(CRLE)模型和全球湖泊蒸发量数据集(GLEV)的结果进行了比较。结果表明,WRF-Lake和GLEV的月和年蒸发总量相似,而CRLE高估了年蒸发总量,与WRF-Lake和GLEV相比,月峰值蒸发抵消。虽然WRF-Lake和GLEV似乎捕获了月和年蒸发总量,但只有WRF-Lake模拟了水库表面蒸发总量的差异。EBR的年平均蒸发量约为1487毫米,但不同地区的年总蒸发量差异可达545毫米。该研究提高了对开放水域蒸发的理解,并阐明了在大型油藏中外推点原位或整体蒸发估算的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing Spatial Heterogeneity in Reservoir Evaporation within the Rio Grande Basin using a Coupled Version of the Weather, Research, and Forecasting Model
Increasing evaporative demand from storage reservoirs is aggravating water scarcity issues across the American West. In the Rio Grande Basin, open water evaporation estimates represent approximately one-fifth of all water losses from the Basin. However, most estimates of reservoir evaporation rely on outdated methods, point measurements, or simplistic models. Warming temperatures and increasing atmospheric evaporative demand are stressing over-allocated resources, increasing the need for improved evaporation estimates. In response to this need, we develop open water evaporation estimates at Elephant Butte Reservoir (EBR), New Mexico, using three evaporation models and field measurements. Few studies quantify spatial heterogeneity in evaporation rates across large reservoirs; we therefore focus our efforts on using the Weather, Research, and Forecasting model coupled to an energy budget lake model, WRF-Lake, to simulate evaporation across EBR over the course of two years. We compare results from WRF-Lake, which simulates lake heat storage, to results from the Complementary Relationship Lake Evaporation (CRLE) model and the Global Lake Evaporation Volume dataset (GLEV). Results indicate that monthly and annual evaporation totals from WRF-Lake and GLEV are similar, while CRLE overestimates annual evaporation totals, with monthly peak evaporation offset compared to WRF-Lake and GLEV. While WRF-Lake and GLEV appear to capture monthly and annual evaporation totals, only WRF-Lake simulates differences in evaporation totals across the reservoir surface. Average annual evaporation at EBR was approximately 1487 mm, yet annual totals differed by up to 545 mm depending on location. This study improves understanding of open water evaporation and elucidates limitations of extrapolating point in-situ or bulk evaporation estimates across large reservoirs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrometeorology
Journal of Hydrometeorology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrometeorology (JHM) (ISSN: 1525-755X; eISSN: 1525-7541) publishes research on modeling, observing, and forecasting processes related to fluxes and storage of water and energy, including interactions with the boundary layer and lower atmosphere, and processes related to precipitation, radiation, and other meteorological inputs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信