冲突论点的关系处理对偏见同化的影响

Keiichi Kobayashi
{"title":"冲突论点的关系处理对偏见同化的影响","authors":"Keiichi Kobayashi","doi":"10.1177/2165222816657801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When exposed to conflicting arguments, people tend to evaluate the attitude-congruent arguments favorably and the attitude-incongruent arguments unfavorably. This phenomenon is called biased assimi...","PeriodicalId":37202,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology","volume":"3 1","pages":"2165222816657801"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relational Processing of Conflicting Arguments Effects on Biased Assimilation\",\"authors\":\"Keiichi Kobayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2165222816657801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When exposed to conflicting arguments, people tend to evaluate the attitude-congruent arguments favorably and the attitude-incongruent arguments unfavorably. This phenomenon is called biased assimi...\",\"PeriodicalId\":37202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"2165222816657801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2165222816657801\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2165222816657801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

当面对相互矛盾的论点时,人们倾向于正面评价态度一致的论点,而负面评价态度不一致的论点。这种现象被称为偏颇assimi。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relational Processing of Conflicting Arguments Effects on Biased Assimilation
When exposed to conflicting arguments, people tend to evaluate the attitude-congruent arguments favorably and the attitude-incongruent arguments unfavorably. This phenomenon is called biased assimi...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology
Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信