{"title":"进化视角下的信仰与生育","authors":"J. Shaver, L. Spake, R. Lynch, M. Shenk","doi":"10.1080/2153599X.2021.2023618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of men’s home production. Feminist Economics, 17(2), 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011. 573484 Esping-Andersen, G., & Billari, F. C. (2015). Re-theorizing family demographics. Population and Development Review, 41(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 207–239. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x Hackett, C., Stonawski, M., Potančoková, M., Grim, B. J., & Skirbekk, V. (2015). The future size of religiously affiliated and unaffiliated populations. Demographic Research, 32, 829–842. http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 26350133 https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.27 Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. Avon Books. Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1465–1495. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2564806 Kaufmann, E. (2010). Shall the religious inherit the earth? Demography and politics in the twenty-first century. Profile. Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x Lutz, W., Skirbekk, V., & Testa, M. R. (2006). The low-fertility trap hypothesis: Forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 4, 167–192. https://doi.org/10. 1553/populationyearbook2006s167 Martin, D. (2005). On secularization: Towards a revised general theory. Ashgate. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427–439. http://www.jstor.org/stable/172314 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x Pace, E. (2007). Religion as communication: The changing shape of Catholicism in Europe. In N. E. Ammerman (Ed.), Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives (pp. 37–50). Oxford University Press. Stolzenberg, R. M., Blair-Loy, M., &Waite, L. J. (1995). Religious participation in early adulthood: Age and family life cycle effects on church membership. American Sociological Review, 60(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 2096347 Tilley, J. R. (2003). Secularization and aging in britain: Does family formation cause greater religiosity? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(2), 269–78. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1387842 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5906. 00178 United Nations. (2020). World fertility and family planning 2020 highlights. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. ST/ESA/SER.A/440. Voas, D. (2008). The rise and fall of fuzzy fidelity in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25(2), 155–168. https:// doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn044","PeriodicalId":45959,"journal":{"name":"Religion Brain & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faith and fertility in evolutionary perspective\",\"authors\":\"J. Shaver, L. Spake, R. Lynch, M. Shenk\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2153599X.2021.2023618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The role of men’s home production. Feminist Economics, 17(2), 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011. 573484 Esping-Andersen, G., & Billari, F. C. (2015). Re-theorizing family demographics. Population and Development Review, 41(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 207–239. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x Hackett, C., Stonawski, M., Potančoková, M., Grim, B. J., & Skirbekk, V. (2015). The future size of religiously affiliated and unaffiliated populations. Demographic Research, 32, 829–842. http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 26350133 https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.27 Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. Avon Books. Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1465–1495. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2564806 Kaufmann, E. (2010). Shall the religious inherit the earth? Demography and politics in the twenty-first century. Profile. Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x Lutz, W., Skirbekk, V., & Testa, M. R. (2006). The low-fertility trap hypothesis: Forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 4, 167–192. https://doi.org/10. 1553/populationyearbook2006s167 Martin, D. (2005). On secularization: Towards a revised general theory. Ashgate. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427–439. http://www.jstor.org/stable/172314 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x Pace, E. (2007). Religion as communication: The changing shape of Catholicism in Europe. In N. E. Ammerman (Ed.), Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives (pp. 37–50). Oxford University Press. Stolzenberg, R. M., Blair-Loy, M., &Waite, L. J. (1995). Religious participation in early adulthood: Age and family life cycle effects on church membership. American Sociological Review, 60(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 2096347 Tilley, J. R. (2003). Secularization and aging in britain: Does family formation cause greater religiosity? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(2), 269–78. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1387842 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5906. 00178 United Nations. (2020). World fertility and family planning 2020 highlights. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. ST/ESA/SER.A/440. Voas, D. (2008). The rise and fall of fuzzy fidelity in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25(2), 155–168. https:// doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn044\",\"PeriodicalId\":45959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religion Brain & Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religion Brain & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2021.2023618\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion Brain & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2021.2023618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of men’s home production. Feminist Economics, 17(2), 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011. 573484 Esping-Andersen, G., & Billari, F. C. (2015). Re-theorizing family demographics. Population and Development Review, 41(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 207–239. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x Hackett, C., Stonawski, M., Potančoková, M., Grim, B. J., & Skirbekk, V. (2015). The future size of religiously affiliated and unaffiliated populations. Demographic Research, 32, 829–842. http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 26350133 https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.27 Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. Avon Books. Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1465–1495. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2564806 Kaufmann, E. (2010). Shall the religious inherit the earth? Demography and politics in the twenty-first century. Profile. Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x Lutz, W., Skirbekk, V., & Testa, M. R. (2006). The low-fertility trap hypothesis: Forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 4, 167–192. https://doi.org/10. 1553/populationyearbook2006s167 Martin, D. (2005). On secularization: Towards a revised general theory. Ashgate. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427–439. http://www.jstor.org/stable/172314 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x Pace, E. (2007). Religion as communication: The changing shape of Catholicism in Europe. In N. E. Ammerman (Ed.), Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives (pp. 37–50). Oxford University Press. Stolzenberg, R. M., Blair-Loy, M., &Waite, L. J. (1995). Religious participation in early adulthood: Age and family life cycle effects on church membership. American Sociological Review, 60(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 2096347 Tilley, J. R. (2003). Secularization and aging in britain: Does family formation cause greater religiosity? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(2), 269–78. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1387842 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5906. 00178 United Nations. (2020). World fertility and family planning 2020 highlights. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. ST/ESA/SER.A/440. Voas, D. (2008). The rise and fall of fuzzy fidelity in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25(2), 155–168. https:// doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn044