开源自动化胰岛素输送系统:糖尿病护理的益处、限制和挑战

IF 0.7 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes Mellitus Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI:10.14341/dm13022
© К.С. Шишин, В.В. Климонтов, Konstantin S. Shishin, Vadim V. Klimontov
{"title":"开源自动化胰岛素输送系统:糖尿病护理的益处、限制和挑战","authors":"© К.С. Шишин, В.В. Климонтов, Konstantin S. Shishin, Vadim V. Klimontov","doi":"10.14341/dm13022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open source closed loop automated insulin delivery (CL-AID) systems are increasingly used in the treatment of diabetes. Assembled on a do-it-yourself (DIY) basis, these systems integrate insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitoring devices, and algorithms that control the rate of insulin delivery based on glucose levels. In this review, we consider the technological features of open source CL-AID systems (OpenAPS, AndroidAPS, Loop, etc.), advantages and barriers to their use in clinical practice. Advantages of open source CL-AID systems over commercially available ones included lower cost, a choice of devices, a wide range of user settings, as well as continuous improvement of algorithms. A growing body of evidence indicates that open source CL-AID systems, such as OpenAPS, AndroidAPS, and Loop, provide an excellent time in range with minimal risk of hypoglycaemia and increase treatment satisfaction in patients with type 1 diabetes. A wide range of settings makes open source systems an effective tool for managing diabetes in situations with rapidly changing insulin requirement. However, some technological, medical, legal and ethical issues associated with the use of non-commercial CL-AID systems still need to be addressed. Assembling the system requires skills in diabetes technology. The issue of cybersecurity is also relevant. Lack of official approvals, low awareness of medical professionals, and reimbursement issues are slowing down the introduction of the technology into clinical practice. The professional medical community at the international and national levels needs to determine its position regarding the use of open source CL-AID systems in the treatment of diabetes.","PeriodicalId":11327,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Mellitus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open source automated insulin delivery systems: benefits, limitations and challenges in diabetes care\",\"authors\":\"© К.С. Шишин, В.В. Климонтов, Konstantin S. Shishin, Vadim V. Klimontov\",\"doi\":\"10.14341/dm13022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Open source closed loop automated insulin delivery (CL-AID) systems are increasingly used in the treatment of diabetes. Assembled on a do-it-yourself (DIY) basis, these systems integrate insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitoring devices, and algorithms that control the rate of insulin delivery based on glucose levels. In this review, we consider the technological features of open source CL-AID systems (OpenAPS, AndroidAPS, Loop, etc.), advantages and barriers to their use in clinical practice. Advantages of open source CL-AID systems over commercially available ones included lower cost, a choice of devices, a wide range of user settings, as well as continuous improvement of algorithms. A growing body of evidence indicates that open source CL-AID systems, such as OpenAPS, AndroidAPS, and Loop, provide an excellent time in range with minimal risk of hypoglycaemia and increase treatment satisfaction in patients with type 1 diabetes. A wide range of settings makes open source systems an effective tool for managing diabetes in situations with rapidly changing insulin requirement. However, some technological, medical, legal and ethical issues associated with the use of non-commercial CL-AID systems still need to be addressed. Assembling the system requires skills in diabetes technology. The issue of cybersecurity is also relevant. Lack of official approvals, low awareness of medical professionals, and reimbursement issues are slowing down the introduction of the technology into clinical practice. The professional medical community at the international and national levels needs to determine its position regarding the use of open source CL-AID systems in the treatment of diabetes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes Mellitus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes Mellitus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14341/dm13022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Mellitus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14341/dm13022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开源闭环自动胰岛素输送(CL-AID)系统越来越多地应用于糖尿病的治疗。这些系统以自己动手(DIY)的方式组装,集成了胰岛素泵、连续血糖监测设备和基于血糖水平控制胰岛素输送速率的算法。在这篇综述中,我们考虑了开源CL-AID系统(OpenAPS、AndroidAPS、Loop等)的技术特点,以及它们在临床实践中使用的优势和障碍。开源CL-AID系统相对于商用系统的优势包括成本更低、设备选择更多、用户设置范围更广,以及算法的不断改进。越来越多的证据表明,开源的dl - aid系统,如OpenAPS、AndroidAPS和Loop,为1型糖尿病患者提供了极好的时间范围,降低了低血糖的风险,提高了治疗满意度。广泛的设置使开源系统成为在胰岛素需求快速变化的情况下管理糖尿病的有效工具。然而,与使用非商业CL-AID系统相关的一些技术、医学、法律和伦理问题仍然需要解决。装配该系统需要糖尿病技术方面的技能。网络安全问题也与此相关。缺乏官方批准、医疗专业人员意识不足以及报销问题正在减缓将该技术引入临床实践。国际和国家层面的专业医学界需要确定其在糖尿病治疗中使用开源CL-AID系统的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open source automated insulin delivery systems: benefits, limitations and challenges in diabetes care
Open source closed loop automated insulin delivery (CL-AID) systems are increasingly used in the treatment of diabetes. Assembled on a do-it-yourself (DIY) basis, these systems integrate insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitoring devices, and algorithms that control the rate of insulin delivery based on glucose levels. In this review, we consider the technological features of open source CL-AID systems (OpenAPS, AndroidAPS, Loop, etc.), advantages and barriers to their use in clinical practice. Advantages of open source CL-AID systems over commercially available ones included lower cost, a choice of devices, a wide range of user settings, as well as continuous improvement of algorithms. A growing body of evidence indicates that open source CL-AID systems, such as OpenAPS, AndroidAPS, and Loop, provide an excellent time in range with minimal risk of hypoglycaemia and increase treatment satisfaction in patients with type 1 diabetes. A wide range of settings makes open source systems an effective tool for managing diabetes in situations with rapidly changing insulin requirement. However, some technological, medical, legal and ethical issues associated with the use of non-commercial CL-AID systems still need to be addressed. Assembling the system requires skills in diabetes technology. The issue of cybersecurity is also relevant. Lack of official approvals, low awareness of medical professionals, and reimbursement issues are slowing down the introduction of the technology into clinical practice. The professional medical community at the international and national levels needs to determine its position regarding the use of open source CL-AID systems in the treatment of diabetes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Mellitus ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
40.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信