Gegenläufige故事.单独和集体治疗并分成分成两类

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
J. Köhne
{"title":"Gegenläufige故事.单独和集体治疗并分成分成两类","authors":"J. Köhne","doi":"10.25162/medhist-2017-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The educational film Let There Be Light (1945/46), directed by the American filmmaker John Huston, was not officially shown until 1980, after having been banned for decades by the US-Army that initially had commissioned it. It portrays a larger group of so called “psychoneurotic” soldiers being ‘cured’ by therapy methods such as hypnosis, narcohypnosis (Sodium Amytal) and group psychotherapy over a period of eight weeks at the psychiatric center of the Mason General Hospital on Long Island, New York, during the Second World War under the direction of Lt. Colonel Dr. Benjamin Simon. At the same time, the film contains subtexts that subverted the trajectory of healing. The subtexts reflect the fact that the allegedly convalescent “war hysterics” were by no means always and permanently free of symptoms. In this educational film, ‘recovery’ and ‘health’ in the aftermath of psychological war trauma, which herein was characterized as a ‘normal’ reaction to the threat of death, are instead exposed as fragile, unstable, and imaginary categories. This article explores the specific cinematic aesthetics and dramaturgical means by which this counter-running double message was created.","PeriodicalId":40892,"journal":{"name":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gegenläufige Erzählungen. Filmische Verfertigung individueller und kollektiver Heilung und ihre Subversion – Let There Be Light (1945/6) von John Huston\",\"authors\":\"J. Köhne\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/medhist-2017-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The educational film Let There Be Light (1945/46), directed by the American filmmaker John Huston, was not officially shown until 1980, after having been banned for decades by the US-Army that initially had commissioned it. It portrays a larger group of so called “psychoneurotic” soldiers being ‘cured’ by therapy methods such as hypnosis, narcohypnosis (Sodium Amytal) and group psychotherapy over a period of eight weeks at the psychiatric center of the Mason General Hospital on Long Island, New York, during the Second World War under the direction of Lt. Colonel Dr. Benjamin Simon. At the same time, the film contains subtexts that subverted the trajectory of healing. The subtexts reflect the fact that the allegedly convalescent “war hysterics” were by no means always and permanently free of symptoms. In this educational film, ‘recovery’ and ‘health’ in the aftermath of psychological war trauma, which herein was characterized as a ‘normal’ reaction to the threat of death, are instead exposed as fragile, unstable, and imaginary categories. This article explores the specific cinematic aesthetics and dramaturgical means by which this counter-running double message was created.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinhistorisches Journal\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinhistorisches Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/medhist-2017-0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/medhist-2017-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由美国电影制作人约翰·休斯顿执导的教育片《让光明存在》(1945/46)直到1980年才正式上映,after被最初委托它的美国军队禁止了几十年。它描绘了第二次世界大战期间,在本杰明·西蒙中校博士的指导下,在纽约长岛梅森综合医院的精神病中心,一群所谓的“精神神经症”士兵在八周的时间里,通过催眠、麻醉催眠(阿米塔尔钠)和团体心理治疗等治疗方法被“治愈”。与此同时,这部电影包含了颠覆治愈轨迹的潜台词。潜台词反映了这样一个事实,即所谓正在康复的"战争歇斯底里症"绝不是永远没有症状的。在这部教育片中,心理战争创伤后的“恢复”和“健康”,在这里被描述为对死亡威胁的“正常”反应,而不是暴露为脆弱,不稳定和想象的类别。本文探讨了这种反向运行的双重信息产生的具体电影美学和戏剧手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gegenläufige Erzählungen. Filmische Verfertigung individueller und kollektiver Heilung und ihre Subversion – Let There Be Light (1945/6) von John Huston
The educational film Let There Be Light (1945/46), directed by the American filmmaker John Huston, was not officially shown until 1980, after having been banned for decades by the US-Army that initially had commissioned it. It portrays a larger group of so called “psychoneurotic” soldiers being ‘cured’ by therapy methods such as hypnosis, narcohypnosis (Sodium Amytal) and group psychotherapy over a period of eight weeks at the psychiatric center of the Mason General Hospital on Long Island, New York, during the Second World War under the direction of Lt. Colonel Dr. Benjamin Simon. At the same time, the film contains subtexts that subverted the trajectory of healing. The subtexts reflect the fact that the allegedly convalescent “war hysterics” were by no means always and permanently free of symptoms. In this educational film, ‘recovery’ and ‘health’ in the aftermath of psychological war trauma, which herein was characterized as a ‘normal’ reaction to the threat of death, are instead exposed as fragile, unstable, and imaginary categories. This article explores the specific cinematic aesthetics and dramaturgical means by which this counter-running double message was created.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medizinhistorisches Journal
Medizinhistorisches Journal HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信