在大流行中参与立法过程的现实:对人权成就的看法

Nur Hamidah Panca Murti, Nurus Salmah
{"title":"在大流行中参与立法过程的现实:对人权成就的看法","authors":"Nur Hamidah Panca Murti, Nurus Salmah","doi":"10.37058/jipp.v8i2.5702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last two years, the pandemic has restricted various public activities. However, the DPR and the Government took advantage of this moment of limitation on community activities to discuss and pass several important laws that affect many people's lives in a non-participatory process. The Employment Creation Act and the Minerva Law are the reality of how the legislators ignore the fundamental right of the community to participate in the formation of the law. This study elaborates on the fact that the legislators in carrying out pseudo-procedural participation and not substantive. The process of drafting the two laws is reviewed and compared to show how the pandemic has become an opportunity to violate people's rights. This study also examines the conception and application of substantial participation in providing protection and guarantees for fulfilling human rights in the legislative process. The digital era increasingly developing in the future is expected to be an opportunity to realize meaningful participation in the formation of laws in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":55825,"journal":{"name":"JPPUMA Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realitas Partisipasi Publik dalam Proses Legislasi di tengah Pandemi: Overview dalam Perspektif Pemenuhan HAM\",\"authors\":\"Nur Hamidah Panca Murti, Nurus Salmah\",\"doi\":\"10.37058/jipp.v8i2.5702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last two years, the pandemic has restricted various public activities. However, the DPR and the Government took advantage of this moment of limitation on community activities to discuss and pass several important laws that affect many people's lives in a non-participatory process. The Employment Creation Act and the Minerva Law are the reality of how the legislators ignore the fundamental right of the community to participate in the formation of the law. This study elaborates on the fact that the legislators in carrying out pseudo-procedural participation and not substantive. The process of drafting the two laws is reviewed and compared to show how the pandemic has become an opportunity to violate people's rights. This study also examines the conception and application of substantial participation in providing protection and guarantees for fulfilling human rights in the legislative process. The digital era increasingly developing in the future is expected to be an opportunity to realize meaningful participation in the formation of laws in Indonesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JPPUMA Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JPPUMA Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37058/jipp.v8i2.5702\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPPUMA Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37058/jipp.v8i2.5702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去两年中,这种流行病限制了各种公共活动。然而,人民民主共和国和政府利用这一限制社区活动的时刻,在非参与性进程中讨论并通过了几项影响许多人生活的重要法律。《创造就业法》和《密涅瓦法》是立法者无视社区参与法律制定的基本权利的现实。本研究阐述了立法者在实行伪程序性参与而非实体性参与的事实。对这两项法律的起草过程进行了审查和比较,以显示疫情如何成为侵犯人民权利的机会。本研究还审查了在立法过程中实质性参与为实现人权提供保护和保障的概念和适用情况。未来日益发展的数字时代有望成为在印度尼西亚实现有意义参与法律制定的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Realitas Partisipasi Publik dalam Proses Legislasi di tengah Pandemi: Overview dalam Perspektif Pemenuhan HAM
In the last two years, the pandemic has restricted various public activities. However, the DPR and the Government took advantage of this moment of limitation on community activities to discuss and pass several important laws that affect many people's lives in a non-participatory process. The Employment Creation Act and the Minerva Law are the reality of how the legislators ignore the fundamental right of the community to participate in the formation of the law. This study elaborates on the fact that the legislators in carrying out pseudo-procedural participation and not substantive. The process of drafting the two laws is reviewed and compared to show how the pandemic has become an opportunity to violate people's rights. This study also examines the conception and application of substantial participation in providing protection and guarantees for fulfilling human rights in the legislative process. The digital era increasingly developing in the future is expected to be an opportunity to realize meaningful participation in the formation of laws in Indonesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信