流媒体电视

IF 0.2 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
{"title":"流媒体电视","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780199791286-0347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Television scholars have been exploring changes within the television industry for decades, with studies of “new” media like cable and satellite television acknowledging the innovative possibilities created by technological advancements while also reasserting the relevance of long-standing modes of practice and conceptual understanding. As such, the emergence of digital technologies as integral to television distribution has inspired work focused on similar themes of change and continuity. While digital technologies span a wide variety of media, this bibliography focuses on streaming television, and as such, related works about streaming video, which may include cinema, gaming, and mobile or social media, may not be included here. There are a variety of reasons for this focus on television, but perhaps most importantly, the content that has consistently animated streaming businesses like Netflix is best called “television,” because it tends to be viewed at home, on small screens, with programming that is serialized or episodic and produced by major media conglomerates. One other caveat is that “streaming television” is only one of a host of common terms to refer to television viewed through the Internet today. Other common terms include convergence, spreadable media, connected viewing, transmedia, web TV, Internet-distributed TV, binge viewing, and subscription video on demand (SVOD), among others. This breadth of keywords demonstrates not only that this is cutting-edge work, but also that scholars and the industry they study are constantly working to pin down an ever-changing research object. To define this evolving area of study, then, this article prioritizes work that builds upon historical and theoretical foundations for the exploration of streaming television. The section organization highlights history, industry, and audience, with additional sections reviewing book-length studies, both single-authored and anthologized. Positioning an entry in any single category is not meant to limit the scope or significance of the work; as such, authors may appear across sections, and some works could comfortably fit under more than one section because the work in this article is nuanced and may feature multiple methodologies. Nevertheless, the section categorizations seek to make sense of a developing subfield and a complex set of objects. The streaming landscape is only becoming more competitive, through the emergence of new streamers (like Hulu and Amazon) and of traditional media companies creating streaming portals (the BBC iPlayer, HBO Max, Paramount+, Disney+, etc.). As such, Netflix may not always be the dominant player in the United States, just as it is often not the dominant player abroad, and for this reason, Netflix is not separated out as an organizing category. This article argues that scholarly work exploring how we study streaming television provides essential tools to understand the industry and its content, now and for years to come.","PeriodicalId":41388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Streaming Television\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/obo/9780199791286-0347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Television scholars have been exploring changes within the television industry for decades, with studies of “new” media like cable and satellite television acknowledging the innovative possibilities created by technological advancements while also reasserting the relevance of long-standing modes of practice and conceptual understanding. As such, the emergence of digital technologies as integral to television distribution has inspired work focused on similar themes of change and continuity. While digital technologies span a wide variety of media, this bibliography focuses on streaming television, and as such, related works about streaming video, which may include cinema, gaming, and mobile or social media, may not be included here. There are a variety of reasons for this focus on television, but perhaps most importantly, the content that has consistently animated streaming businesses like Netflix is best called “television,” because it tends to be viewed at home, on small screens, with programming that is serialized or episodic and produced by major media conglomerates. One other caveat is that “streaming television” is only one of a host of common terms to refer to television viewed through the Internet today. Other common terms include convergence, spreadable media, connected viewing, transmedia, web TV, Internet-distributed TV, binge viewing, and subscription video on demand (SVOD), among others. This breadth of keywords demonstrates not only that this is cutting-edge work, but also that scholars and the industry they study are constantly working to pin down an ever-changing research object. To define this evolving area of study, then, this article prioritizes work that builds upon historical and theoretical foundations for the exploration of streaming television. The section organization highlights history, industry, and audience, with additional sections reviewing book-length studies, both single-authored and anthologized. Positioning an entry in any single category is not meant to limit the scope or significance of the work; as such, authors may appear across sections, and some works could comfortably fit under more than one section because the work in this article is nuanced and may feature multiple methodologies. Nevertheless, the section categorizations seek to make sense of a developing subfield and a complex set of objects. The streaming landscape is only becoming more competitive, through the emergence of new streamers (like Hulu and Amazon) and of traditional media companies creating streaming portals (the BBC iPlayer, HBO Max, Paramount+, Disney+, etc.). As such, Netflix may not always be the dominant player in the United States, just as it is often not the dominant player abroad, and for this reason, Netflix is not separated out as an organizing category. This article argues that scholarly work exploring how we study streaming television provides essential tools to understand the industry and its content, now and for years to come.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199791286-0347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199791286-0347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,电视学者一直在探索电视行业的变化,对有线电视和卫星电视等“新”媒体的研究承认了技术进步带来的创新可能性,同时也重申了长期存在的实践模式和概念理解的相关性。因此,作为电视发行不可或缺的数字技术的出现,激发了关注类似变化和连续性主题的工作。虽然数字技术涵盖了各种各样的媒体,但本参考书目侧重于流媒体电视,因此,关于流媒体视频的相关作品,可能包括电影、游戏、移动或社交媒体,可能不包括在这里。这种对电视的关注有多种原因,但也许最重要的是,Netflix等流媒体业务持续活跃的内容最适合被称为“电视”,因为它往往是在家里的小屏幕上观看的,节目是连载或剧集,由大型媒体集团制作。另一个警告是,“流媒体电视”只是当今通过互联网观看电视的众多常用术语之一。其他常用术语包括融合、可传播媒体、连接观看、跨媒体、网络电视、互联网分发电视、狂欢观看和订阅视频点播(SVOD)等。如此广泛的关键词不仅表明这是一项前沿工作,也表明学者和他们所研究的行业正在不断努力确定一个不断变化的研究对象。为了定义这一不断发展的研究领域,本文将优先考虑建立在探索流媒体电视的历史和理论基础之上的工作。部分组织突出历史,工业,和观众,与额外的部分审查书籍长度的研究,无论是单作者和选集。将参赛作品归入任何单一类别并不意味着限制作品的范围或重要性;因此,作者可能出现在不同的部分,并且有些作品可以轻松地放在多个部分中,因为本文中的工作是微妙的,并且可能具有多种方法。尽管如此,章节分类试图理解一个发展中的子领域和一组复杂的对象。随着新的流媒体(如Hulu和亚马逊)和传统媒体公司创建流媒体门户(BBC iPlayer、HBO Max、派拉蒙+、迪士尼+等)的出现,流媒体行业的竞争只会变得更加激烈。因此,Netflix可能并不总是在美国占据主导地位,就像它在国外经常不是主导地位一样,因此,Netflix并没有被划分为一个组织类别。本文认为,探索我们如何研究流媒体电视的学术工作,为现在和未来几年了解这个行业及其内容提供了必要的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Streaming Television
Television scholars have been exploring changes within the television industry for decades, with studies of “new” media like cable and satellite television acknowledging the innovative possibilities created by technological advancements while also reasserting the relevance of long-standing modes of practice and conceptual understanding. As such, the emergence of digital technologies as integral to television distribution has inspired work focused on similar themes of change and continuity. While digital technologies span a wide variety of media, this bibliography focuses on streaming television, and as such, related works about streaming video, which may include cinema, gaming, and mobile or social media, may not be included here. There are a variety of reasons for this focus on television, but perhaps most importantly, the content that has consistently animated streaming businesses like Netflix is best called “television,” because it tends to be viewed at home, on small screens, with programming that is serialized or episodic and produced by major media conglomerates. One other caveat is that “streaming television” is only one of a host of common terms to refer to television viewed through the Internet today. Other common terms include convergence, spreadable media, connected viewing, transmedia, web TV, Internet-distributed TV, binge viewing, and subscription video on demand (SVOD), among others. This breadth of keywords demonstrates not only that this is cutting-edge work, but also that scholars and the industry they study are constantly working to pin down an ever-changing research object. To define this evolving area of study, then, this article prioritizes work that builds upon historical and theoretical foundations for the exploration of streaming television. The section organization highlights history, industry, and audience, with additional sections reviewing book-length studies, both single-authored and anthologized. Positioning an entry in any single category is not meant to limit the scope or significance of the work; as such, authors may appear across sections, and some works could comfortably fit under more than one section because the work in this article is nuanced and may feature multiple methodologies. Nevertheless, the section categorizations seek to make sense of a developing subfield and a complex set of objects. The streaming landscape is only becoming more competitive, through the emergence of new streamers (like Hulu and Amazon) and of traditional media companies creating streaming portals (the BBC iPlayer, HBO Max, Paramount+, Disney+, etc.). As such, Netflix may not always be the dominant player in the United States, just as it is often not the dominant player abroad, and for this reason, Netflix is not separated out as an organizing category. This article argues that scholarly work exploring how we study streaming television provides essential tools to understand the industry and its content, now and for years to come.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies is an English-language forum for theoretical, methodological and critical debate on Italian film and media production, reception and consumption. It provides a platform for dialogue between academics, filmmakers, cinema and media professionals. This peer-reviewed journal invites submissions of scholarly articles relating to the artistic features, cultural themes, international influence and history of Italian film and media. Furthermore, the journal intends to revive a critical discussion on the auteurs, revisit the historiography of Italian cinema and celebrate the dynamic role played by new directors. The journal includes a book and film review section as well as notes on Italian film festivals abroad and international conference reports. The profound transformation undergone by the rapidly expanding media environment under the impact of digital technology, has lead scholars in the field of media studies to elaborate new theoretical paradigms and methodological approaches to account for the complexities of a changing landscape of convergence and hybridization. The boundaries between cinema and media as art forms and fields of inquiry are increasingly hybridized too. Taking into account this evolving scenario, the JICMS provides an international arena for critical engagement with a wider range of issues related to the current media environment. The journal welcomes in particular contributions that discuss any aspects of Italian media production, distribution and consumption within national and transnational, social, political, economic and historical contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信