台式和便携式近红外光谱仪测量两种桉树(pelellita和benthamii)木材样品的比较性能

C. P. Diniz, D. Grattapaglia, L. F. A. Figueiredo
{"title":"台式和便携式近红外光谱仪测量两种桉树(pelellita和benthamii)木材样品的比较性能","authors":"C. P. Diniz, D. Grattapaglia, L. F. A. Figueiredo","doi":"10.1255/NIR2017.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author Summary: The well-established and ever-growing applications of near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy for wood science and technology using bench spectrometers is unquestionable. However, the increasing interest in using portable spectrometers due to their perceived advantages raises the question of how good are they? In this work, we acquired spectra from wood sawdust samples of two Eucalyptus species, E. pellita and E. benthamii, totaling 1200 individual trees sampled in experimental breeding populations. Spectra were acquired in parallel using a bench spectrometer (FOSS NIRSystems 5000) and a portable instrument (Viavi MicroNIR1700). Spectra acquisition on the bench spectrometer had a longer wavelength (1100–2500 nm versus 908–1700 nm) and a shorter absorbance profile. Principal component analysis on the spectral data of both instruments was not able to clearly separate the two species suggesting some level of overlapping distributions of the chemical composition of their respective wood properties. Linear discriminant analysis, however, had excellent accuracies with the bench spectrometer (~99 %), showing significantly better discrimination than the one obtained with the portable one (~93 %). Similarly, partial least square discriminant analysis showed correlations (r) around 0.96 and standard errors of calibration (SEC) and of cross validation (SECV) lower than 0.155 on the bench instrument, while the portable spectrometer had r ~ 0.88 with SEC and SECV below 0.235. Although the bench instrument showed a better performance, the parameters estimated with the portable spectrometer were very satisfactory given its intrinsic limitations in robustness and handling needs. Chemical analyses for lignin content are in progress which, combined with data transformation and selection of spectra regions, could put the two instruments on similar performance grounds. These results are particularly relevant for rapid and simple wood phenotyping applications in advanced tree breeding operations.","PeriodicalId":20429,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Near Infrared Spectroscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative performance of bench and portable near infrared spectrometers for measuring wood samples of two\\nEucalyptus species (E. pellita and E. benthamii)\",\"authors\":\"C. P. Diniz, D. Grattapaglia, L. F. A. Figueiredo\",\"doi\":\"10.1255/NIR2017.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author Summary: The well-established and ever-growing applications of near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy for wood science and technology using bench spectrometers is unquestionable. However, the increasing interest in using portable spectrometers due to their perceived advantages raises the question of how good are they? In this work, we acquired spectra from wood sawdust samples of two Eucalyptus species, E. pellita and E. benthamii, totaling 1200 individual trees sampled in experimental breeding populations. Spectra were acquired in parallel using a bench spectrometer (FOSS NIRSystems 5000) and a portable instrument (Viavi MicroNIR1700). Spectra acquisition on the bench spectrometer had a longer wavelength (1100–2500 nm versus 908–1700 nm) and a shorter absorbance profile. Principal component analysis on the spectral data of both instruments was not able to clearly separate the two species suggesting some level of overlapping distributions of the chemical composition of their respective wood properties. Linear discriminant analysis, however, had excellent accuracies with the bench spectrometer (~99 %), showing significantly better discrimination than the one obtained with the portable one (~93 %). Similarly, partial least square discriminant analysis showed correlations (r) around 0.96 and standard errors of calibration (SEC) and of cross validation (SECV) lower than 0.155 on the bench instrument, while the portable spectrometer had r ~ 0.88 with SEC and SECV below 0.235. Although the bench instrument showed a better performance, the parameters estimated with the portable spectrometer were very satisfactory given its intrinsic limitations in robustness and handling needs. Chemical analyses for lignin content are in progress which, combined with data transformation and selection of spectra regions, could put the two instruments on similar performance grounds. These results are particularly relevant for rapid and simple wood phenotyping applications in advanced tree breeding operations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Near Infrared Spectroscopy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Near Infrared Spectroscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1255/NIR2017.031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Near Infrared Spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1255/NIR2017.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作者总结:近红外(NIR)光谱在木材科学和技术中使用台式光谱仪的成熟和不断增长的应用是毋庸置疑的。然而,由于便携式光谱仪的优势,人们对其越来越感兴趣,这就提出了一个问题:它们到底有多好?在这项工作中,我们获得了两种桉树的木材锯末样品的光谱,即pellita和benthamii,总共1200棵实验育种种群的树木样本。使用台式光谱仪(FOSS NIRSystems 5000)和便携式仪器(Viavi MicroNIR1700)并行获取光谱。台式光谱仪的光谱采集波长较长(1100 ~ 2500 nm比908 ~ 1700 nm),吸光度曲线较短。对两种仪器的光谱数据进行主成分分析无法清楚地区分这两个物种,这表明它们各自木材特性的化学成分有一定程度的重叠分布。而台式谱仪的线性判别分析具有良好的准确度(~ 99%),明显优于便携式谱仪(~ 93%)。同样,偏最小二乘判别分析结果显示,台式仪器的相关系数(r)在0.96左右,校准标准误差(SEC)和交叉验证标准误差(SECV)均小于0.155,便携式光谱仪的相关系数(r)在0.88左右,SEC和SECV均小于0.235。尽管台式仪器表现出更好的性能,但考虑到便携式光谱仪在鲁棒性和处理需求方面的固有局限性,便携式光谱仪估计的参数非常令人满意。木质素含量的化学分析正在进行中,结合数据转换和光谱区域的选择,可以使两种仪器具有相似的性能基础。这些结果对于在高级树木育种操作中快速和简单的木材表型分析应用特别相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative performance of bench and portable near infrared spectrometers for measuring wood samples of two Eucalyptus species (E. pellita and E. benthamii)
Author Summary: The well-established and ever-growing applications of near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy for wood science and technology using bench spectrometers is unquestionable. However, the increasing interest in using portable spectrometers due to their perceived advantages raises the question of how good are they? In this work, we acquired spectra from wood sawdust samples of two Eucalyptus species, E. pellita and E. benthamii, totaling 1200 individual trees sampled in experimental breeding populations. Spectra were acquired in parallel using a bench spectrometer (FOSS NIRSystems 5000) and a portable instrument (Viavi MicroNIR1700). Spectra acquisition on the bench spectrometer had a longer wavelength (1100–2500 nm versus 908–1700 nm) and a shorter absorbance profile. Principal component analysis on the spectral data of both instruments was not able to clearly separate the two species suggesting some level of overlapping distributions of the chemical composition of their respective wood properties. Linear discriminant analysis, however, had excellent accuracies with the bench spectrometer (~99 %), showing significantly better discrimination than the one obtained with the portable one (~93 %). Similarly, partial least square discriminant analysis showed correlations (r) around 0.96 and standard errors of calibration (SEC) and of cross validation (SECV) lower than 0.155 on the bench instrument, while the portable spectrometer had r ~ 0.88 with SEC and SECV below 0.235. Although the bench instrument showed a better performance, the parameters estimated with the portable spectrometer were very satisfactory given its intrinsic limitations in robustness and handling needs. Chemical analyses for lignin content are in progress which, combined with data transformation and selection of spectra regions, could put the two instruments on similar performance grounds. These results are particularly relevant for rapid and simple wood phenotyping applications in advanced tree breeding operations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信