了解你的客户:通过首次代币发行(ico)筹集资金的实证意义

Galia Kondova, P. Shanmuganathan
{"title":"了解你的客户:通过首次代币发行(ico)筹集资金的实证意义","authors":"Galia Kondova, P. Shanmuganathan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3549478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Major legal jurisdictions like the European Union (EU), Switzerland and the US took a stricter stance on ICOs in the period 2017-2018 by imposing anti-money laundering (AML) provisions and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements on ICOs. Shortly after that, a sharp decrease in the number of ICOs was registered. Moreover, this study provides empirical evidence of a negative impact of the introduction of KYC procedure on the amount of raised capital in ICOs. Furthermore, the fundraising impact of additional ICO characteristics like duration, team, vision, rating, and location is also studied in the paper. The study is based on a multivariate regressional analysis of an international sample of 855 ICOs in the period 2015 – September 2019. The paper concludes that introducing a KYC requirement crowds out anonymous (presumably delinquent) investors at the cost of the raised capital. At the same time, the stricter legislation enhances the establishment of a level-playing field for all tokenized financing instruments such as ICOs, security token offerings (STOs) and initial digital offerings (IDOs) thus putting the end of the “gold rush” of the ICOs.","PeriodicalId":13594,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems & Economics eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowing Your Customer: Empirical Implications for Raising Capital through Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs)\",\"authors\":\"Galia Kondova, P. Shanmuganathan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3549478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Major legal jurisdictions like the European Union (EU), Switzerland and the US took a stricter stance on ICOs in the period 2017-2018 by imposing anti-money laundering (AML) provisions and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements on ICOs. Shortly after that, a sharp decrease in the number of ICOs was registered. Moreover, this study provides empirical evidence of a negative impact of the introduction of KYC procedure on the amount of raised capital in ICOs. Furthermore, the fundraising impact of additional ICO characteristics like duration, team, vision, rating, and location is also studied in the paper. The study is based on a multivariate regressional analysis of an international sample of 855 ICOs in the period 2015 – September 2019. The paper concludes that introducing a KYC requirement crowds out anonymous (presumably delinquent) investors at the cost of the raised capital. At the same time, the stricter legislation enhances the establishment of a level-playing field for all tokenized financing instruments such as ICOs, security token offerings (STOs) and initial digital offerings (IDOs) thus putting the end of the “gold rush” of the ICOs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems & Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems & Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3549478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems & Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3549478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟(EU)、瑞士和美国等主要司法管辖区在2017-2018年期间对ico采取了更严格的立场,对ico实施了反洗钱(AML)条款和了解你的客户(KYC)要求。在那之后不久,注册的ico数量急剧减少。此外,本研究还提供了实证证据,证明引入KYC程序对ico融资金额产生了负面影响。此外,本文还研究了ICO的其他特征(如持续时间、团队、愿景、评级和地点)对融资的影响。该研究基于对2015年至2019年9月期间855个ico国际样本的多元回归分析。该论文的结论是,引入KYC要求会以筹集资金为代价排挤匿名(可能是违约)投资者。与此同时,更严格的立法加强了为所有代币化融资工具(如ico,证券代币发行(sto)和首次数字发行(ipo))建立公平竞争环境的努力,从而结束了ico的“淘金热”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowing Your Customer: Empirical Implications for Raising Capital through Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs)
Major legal jurisdictions like the European Union (EU), Switzerland and the US took a stricter stance on ICOs in the period 2017-2018 by imposing anti-money laundering (AML) provisions and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements on ICOs. Shortly after that, a sharp decrease in the number of ICOs was registered. Moreover, this study provides empirical evidence of a negative impact of the introduction of KYC procedure on the amount of raised capital in ICOs. Furthermore, the fundraising impact of additional ICO characteristics like duration, team, vision, rating, and location is also studied in the paper. The study is based on a multivariate regressional analysis of an international sample of 855 ICOs in the period 2015 – September 2019. The paper concludes that introducing a KYC requirement crowds out anonymous (presumably delinquent) investors at the cost of the raised capital. At the same time, the stricter legislation enhances the establishment of a level-playing field for all tokenized financing instruments such as ICOs, security token offerings (STOs) and initial digital offerings (IDOs) thus putting the end of the “gold rush” of the ICOs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信