使用精度测量评估仿真模型简化

I. Stogniy, W. Scholl
{"title":"使用精度测量评估仿真模型简化","authors":"I. Stogniy, W. Scholl","doi":"10.1109/WSC48552.2020.9383918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Infineon Technologies Dresden has long used discrete event simulation to optimize production planning for its fully automated front end manufacturing lines. There are needs to reduce maintenance efforts, to increase transparency for validation and verification, and to improve flexibility for the fast simulation of scenarios with a focus on qualitative statements. Less detailed models will be utilized where components could be omitted. This paper considers a simplification of the process flows through operation substitution for constant delays. The main idea is to consider the accuracy measurements used to evaluate simplification. It is shown that standard accuracy measurements (e.g. mean absolute error, correlation coefficient, etc.) produce rather poor performance. It is suggested instead to use measurements based on lot cycle time distributions (e.g. goodness-of-fit tests). Nine types of simplification sieve functions were analyzed, with analyses based on the MIMAC dataset 5 model.","PeriodicalId":6692,"journal":{"name":"2020 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)","volume":"28 1","pages":"1825-1836"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Accuracy Measurements to Evaluate Simulation Model Simplification\",\"authors\":\"I. Stogniy, W. Scholl\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WSC48552.2020.9383918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Infineon Technologies Dresden has long used discrete event simulation to optimize production planning for its fully automated front end manufacturing lines. There are needs to reduce maintenance efforts, to increase transparency for validation and verification, and to improve flexibility for the fast simulation of scenarios with a focus on qualitative statements. Less detailed models will be utilized where components could be omitted. This paper considers a simplification of the process flows through operation substitution for constant delays. The main idea is to consider the accuracy measurements used to evaluate simplification. It is shown that standard accuracy measurements (e.g. mean absolute error, correlation coefficient, etc.) produce rather poor performance. It is suggested instead to use measurements based on lot cycle time distributions (e.g. goodness-of-fit tests). Nine types of simplification sieve functions were analyzed, with analyses based on the MIMAC dataset 5 model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"1825-1836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC48552.2020.9383918\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC48552.2020.9383918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英飞凌德累斯顿技术有限公司长期以来一直使用离散事件模拟来优化其全自动前端生产线的生产计划。需要减少维护工作,增加确认和验证的透明度,并提高专注于定性陈述的场景快速模拟的灵活性。在可以省略组件的地方,将使用不太详细的模型。本文考虑了一种通过操作替换来简化过程流的方法。主要思想是考虑用于评估简化的精度测量。结果表明,标准精度测量(如平均绝对误差,相关系数等)产生相当差的性能。建议使用基于批次周期时间分布的测量方法(例如,拟合优度检验)。基于MIMAC数据集5模型,分析了9种简化筛选函数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Accuracy Measurements to Evaluate Simulation Model Simplification
Infineon Technologies Dresden has long used discrete event simulation to optimize production planning for its fully automated front end manufacturing lines. There are needs to reduce maintenance efforts, to increase transparency for validation and verification, and to improve flexibility for the fast simulation of scenarios with a focus on qualitative statements. Less detailed models will be utilized where components could be omitted. This paper considers a simplification of the process flows through operation substitution for constant delays. The main idea is to consider the accuracy measurements used to evaluate simplification. It is shown that standard accuracy measurements (e.g. mean absolute error, correlation coefficient, etc.) produce rather poor performance. It is suggested instead to use measurements based on lot cycle time distributions (e.g. goodness-of-fit tests). Nine types of simplification sieve functions were analyzed, with analyses based on the MIMAC dataset 5 model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信