COVID-19联合药物治疗:我们在这些患者的管理中是否使用了健全的科学?

J. Mathew, S. Antony
{"title":"COVID-19联合药物治疗:我们在这些患者的管理中是否使用了健全的科学?","authors":"J. Mathew, S. Antony","doi":"10.5812/IJI.108984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Multiple case reports have shown promising results with remdesivir, tocilizumab and convalescent plasma. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with remdesivir, tocilizumab, steroids, antibiotics and convalescent plasma in COVID-19 patients. Objectives: To assess whether a multi-pronged approach to tackling SARS-CoV-2 had an impact on our primary end goal of decreasing the need for mechanical ventilation and identify some of the complexities involved with combination treatment regimens. Methods: In this retrospective, single center study, six confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients with similar demographics and comorbidities treated with a combination of remdesivir, tocilizumab, antibiotics, steroids and convalescent plasma were followed. Results: At the time of initiation of treatment, all six patients were requiring at least 3 liters of supplemental oxygenation via nasal cannula. All patients received remdesivir for 5 - 10 days, tocilizumab for a total of 4 doses each across 2 days, methylprednisone and antibiotics. Commonly used antibiotics were cefepime, azithromycin, ceftriaxone and piperacillin/tazobactam. Convalescent plasma was given to three out of the six patients. Despite combination therapy with remdesivir, tocilizumab, steroids, antibiotics and convalescent plasma, four out of the six patients (66.67%) deteriorated and required invasive mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: There are currently no set treatment guidelines for COVID 19. Most institutions appear to be utilizing some form of combination therapy against COVID-19. In this study, invasive mechanical ventilation was avoided in only two of six patients despite robust use of combination therapy in all patients. Our study suggests that multiple medications may not be the answer. Instead, a clearer understanding of the pathophysiology along with timing at which medications are introduced might play a more important role. We propose judicious use of combination therapy in a methodical and sequential use in patients requiring three or more liters of supplemental oxygen. Use of any of these medications, either by itself or in combination, after mechanical ventilation has minimal if any benefits and should be used as a last resort. Currently, a few clinical trials in the recruiting stage are underway that look at various combination therapies that could provide a more comprehensive understanding regarding the efficacy of combination therapy against SARS-CoV-2.","PeriodicalId":13989,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infection","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination Drug Therapy in COVID-19: Are We Using Sound Science in the Management of These Patients?\",\"authors\":\"J. Mathew, S. Antony\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/IJI.108984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Multiple case reports have shown promising results with remdesivir, tocilizumab and convalescent plasma. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with remdesivir, tocilizumab, steroids, antibiotics and convalescent plasma in COVID-19 patients. Objectives: To assess whether a multi-pronged approach to tackling SARS-CoV-2 had an impact on our primary end goal of decreasing the need for mechanical ventilation and identify some of the complexities involved with combination treatment regimens. Methods: In this retrospective, single center study, six confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients with similar demographics and comorbidities treated with a combination of remdesivir, tocilizumab, antibiotics, steroids and convalescent plasma were followed. Results: At the time of initiation of treatment, all six patients were requiring at least 3 liters of supplemental oxygenation via nasal cannula. All patients received remdesivir for 5 - 10 days, tocilizumab for a total of 4 doses each across 2 days, methylprednisone and antibiotics. Commonly used antibiotics were cefepime, azithromycin, ceftriaxone and piperacillin/tazobactam. Convalescent plasma was given to three out of the six patients. Despite combination therapy with remdesivir, tocilizumab, steroids, antibiotics and convalescent plasma, four out of the six patients (66.67%) deteriorated and required invasive mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: There are currently no set treatment guidelines for COVID 19. Most institutions appear to be utilizing some form of combination therapy against COVID-19. In this study, invasive mechanical ventilation was avoided in only two of six patients despite robust use of combination therapy in all patients. Our study suggests that multiple medications may not be the answer. Instead, a clearer understanding of the pathophysiology along with timing at which medications are introduced might play a more important role. We propose judicious use of combination therapy in a methodical and sequential use in patients requiring three or more liters of supplemental oxygen. Use of any of these medications, either by itself or in combination, after mechanical ventilation has minimal if any benefits and should be used as a last resort. Currently, a few clinical trials in the recruiting stage are underway that look at various combination therapies that could provide a more comprehensive understanding regarding the efficacy of combination therapy against SARS-CoV-2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Infection\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/IJI.108984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/IJI.108984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多个病例报告显示,瑞德西韦、托珠单抗和恢复期血浆治疗有很好的效果。我们评估了瑞德西韦、托珠单抗、类固醇、抗生素和恢复期血浆联合治疗COVID-19患者的疗效和安全性。目的:评估多管齐下应对SARS-CoV-2的方法是否对我们减少机械通气需求的主要最终目标产生影响,并确定联合治疗方案涉及的一些复杂性。方法:采用回顾性、单中心研究方法,对6例经确诊的SARS-CoV-2患者进行随访,这些患者具有相似的人口统计学特征和合并症,并联合使用瑞德西韦、托珠单抗、抗生素、类固醇和恢复期血浆治疗。结果:在治疗开始时,6例患者均需要至少3升的鼻插管补充氧合。所有患者接受瑞德西韦治疗5 - 10天,托珠单抗治疗共4次,每次2天,甲泼尼松和抗生素治疗。常用的抗生素有头孢吡肟、阿奇霉素、头孢曲松和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦。6名患者中有3名接受了恢复期血浆治疗。尽管采用瑞德西韦、托珠单抗、类固醇、抗生素和恢复期血浆联合治疗,6例患者中仍有4例(66.67%)病情恶化并需要有创机械通气。结论:目前没有针对COVID - 19的固定治疗指南。大多数机构似乎都在使用某种形式的联合疗法来对抗COVID-19。在这项研究中,尽管所有患者都使用了强有力的联合治疗,但6例患者中只有2例避免了有创机械通气。我们的研究表明,多种药物可能不是答案。相反,更清楚地了解病理生理学以及引入药物的时间可能起着更重要的作用。我们建议在需要三升或更多补充氧的患者中,明智地使用有系统和顺序的联合治疗。在机械通气后单独或联合使用任何这些药物,即使有任何益处也微乎其微,应作为最后手段使用。目前,正在进行招募阶段的一些临床试验,研究各种联合疗法,以便更全面地了解联合疗法对SARS-CoV-2的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combination Drug Therapy in COVID-19: Are We Using Sound Science in the Management of These Patients?
Background: Multiple case reports have shown promising results with remdesivir, tocilizumab and convalescent plasma. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with remdesivir, tocilizumab, steroids, antibiotics and convalescent plasma in COVID-19 patients. Objectives: To assess whether a multi-pronged approach to tackling SARS-CoV-2 had an impact on our primary end goal of decreasing the need for mechanical ventilation and identify some of the complexities involved with combination treatment regimens. Methods: In this retrospective, single center study, six confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients with similar demographics and comorbidities treated with a combination of remdesivir, tocilizumab, antibiotics, steroids and convalescent plasma were followed. Results: At the time of initiation of treatment, all six patients were requiring at least 3 liters of supplemental oxygenation via nasal cannula. All patients received remdesivir for 5 - 10 days, tocilizumab for a total of 4 doses each across 2 days, methylprednisone and antibiotics. Commonly used antibiotics were cefepime, azithromycin, ceftriaxone and piperacillin/tazobactam. Convalescent plasma was given to three out of the six patients. Despite combination therapy with remdesivir, tocilizumab, steroids, antibiotics and convalescent plasma, four out of the six patients (66.67%) deteriorated and required invasive mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: There are currently no set treatment guidelines for COVID 19. Most institutions appear to be utilizing some form of combination therapy against COVID-19. In this study, invasive mechanical ventilation was avoided in only two of six patients despite robust use of combination therapy in all patients. Our study suggests that multiple medications may not be the answer. Instead, a clearer understanding of the pathophysiology along with timing at which medications are introduced might play a more important role. We propose judicious use of combination therapy in a methodical and sequential use in patients requiring three or more liters of supplemental oxygen. Use of any of these medications, either by itself or in combination, after mechanical ventilation has minimal if any benefits and should be used as a last resort. Currently, a few clinical trials in the recruiting stage are underway that look at various combination therapies that could provide a more comprehensive understanding regarding the efficacy of combination therapy against SARS-CoV-2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信