Rick Rabiser, Sam Guinea, Michael Vierhauser, L. Baresi, P. Grünbacher
{"title":"运行时监控方法的比较框架(期刊优先摘要)","authors":"Rick Rabiser, Sam Guinea, Michael Vierhauser, L. Baresi, P. Grünbacher","doi":"10.1109/SANER.2018.8330238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This extended abstract summarizes our paper entitled \"A Comparison Framework for Runtime Monitoring Approaches\" published in the Journal on Systems and Software in vol. 125 in 2017 (https://doi.org/10.1016/jjss.2016.12.034). This paper provides the following contributions: (i) a framework that supports analyzing and comparing runtime monitoring approaches using different dimensions and elements; (ii) an application of the framework to analyze and compare 32 existing monitoring approaches; and (iii) a discussion of perspectives and potential future applications of our framework, e.g., to support the selection of an approach for a particular monitoring problem or application context.","PeriodicalId":6541,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)","volume":"25 1","pages":"472"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison framework for runtime monitoring approaches (journal-first abstract)\",\"authors\":\"Rick Rabiser, Sam Guinea, Michael Vierhauser, L. Baresi, P. Grünbacher\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SANER.2018.8330238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This extended abstract summarizes our paper entitled \\\"A Comparison Framework for Runtime Monitoring Approaches\\\" published in the Journal on Systems and Software in vol. 125 in 2017 (https://doi.org/10.1016/jjss.2016.12.034). This paper provides the following contributions: (i) a framework that supports analyzing and comparing runtime monitoring approaches using different dimensions and elements; (ii) an application of the framework to analyze and compare 32 existing monitoring approaches; and (iii) a discussion of perspectives and potential future applications of our framework, e.g., to support the selection of an approach for a particular monitoring problem or application context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2018.8330238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2018.8330238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparison framework for runtime monitoring approaches (journal-first abstract)
This extended abstract summarizes our paper entitled "A Comparison Framework for Runtime Monitoring Approaches" published in the Journal on Systems and Software in vol. 125 in 2017 (https://doi.org/10.1016/jjss.2016.12.034). This paper provides the following contributions: (i) a framework that supports analyzing and comparing runtime monitoring approaches using different dimensions and elements; (ii) an application of the framework to analyze and compare 32 existing monitoring approaches; and (iii) a discussion of perspectives and potential future applications of our framework, e.g., to support the selection of an approach for a particular monitoring problem or application context.