一项开放标签、随机、前瞻性、比较、三组临床试验,评估阿普米司特三种不同滴定方法在印度慢性斑块型银屑病患者中的安全性和有效性

Vishalakshi Viswanath, Pradnya Joshi, Prakash Lawate, Dakshata Tare, D. Dhoot, Namrata Mahadkar, Hanmant Barkate
{"title":"一项开放标签、随机、前瞻性、比较、三组临床试验,评估阿普米司特三种不同滴定方法在印度慢性斑块型银屑病患者中的安全性和有效性","authors":"Vishalakshi Viswanath, Pradnya Joshi, Prakash Lawate, Dakshata Tare, D. Dhoot, Namrata Mahadkar, Hanmant Barkate","doi":"10.2147/PTT.S357184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To minimize adverse effects (AEs), apremilast is recommended to titrate at the initiation of therapy. But still, many patients experience AEs, resulting in discontinuation of therapy. As a result, many dermatologists have adapted to further titrate apremilast in different ways. The present study was planned to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of apremilast in different dose titration methods as initiation therapy in the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Patients and Methods In this open-label, randomized, prospective, comparative, three-arm, single center study, 128 plaque psoriasis patients were included. Patients were randomized into three groups. Group I received standard titration for the first 6 days; Group II received all tablets in a starter pack as once a day (OD) total for 13 days; and Group III received two starter packs as 8 tablets each of apremilast 10 mg and 20 mg as OD and 10 tablets of 30 mg as OD, in total for 26 days. All groups received apremilast 30 mg as twice a day after initial titration. The total duration of apremilast therapy in all groups was 16 weeks. Results In safety assessment, AEs were reported in 50%, 41.3% and 25% in Groups I, II and III, respectively (p <0.05) with nausea being the most common AE. In Group I, 10.53% of patients discontinued apremilast whereas 6.52% and 2.27% discontinued in Groups II and III respectively. Maximum number of AEs were seen in Group I in first week only (74.19%) compared with other groups. At week 16, on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PASI 75 was achieved in 31.43%, 42.4% and 33.3% of patients in Groups I, II and III, respectively with no statistical difference between any groups. Conclusion It can be concluded that slower titration is a useful strategy for minimizing AEs while at the same time maintaining effectiveness of apremilast.","PeriodicalId":20796,"journal":{"name":"Psoriasis : Targets and Therapy","volume":"1 1","pages":"53 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Open-Label, Randomized, Prospective, Comparative, Three-Arm Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Apremilast with Three Different Titration Methods in Patients with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis in India\",\"authors\":\"Vishalakshi Viswanath, Pradnya Joshi, Prakash Lawate, Dakshata Tare, D. Dhoot, Namrata Mahadkar, Hanmant Barkate\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PTT.S357184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose To minimize adverse effects (AEs), apremilast is recommended to titrate at the initiation of therapy. But still, many patients experience AEs, resulting in discontinuation of therapy. As a result, many dermatologists have adapted to further titrate apremilast in different ways. The present study was planned to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of apremilast in different dose titration methods as initiation therapy in the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Patients and Methods In this open-label, randomized, prospective, comparative, three-arm, single center study, 128 plaque psoriasis patients were included. Patients were randomized into three groups. Group I received standard titration for the first 6 days; Group II received all tablets in a starter pack as once a day (OD) total for 13 days; and Group III received two starter packs as 8 tablets each of apremilast 10 mg and 20 mg as OD and 10 tablets of 30 mg as OD, in total for 26 days. All groups received apremilast 30 mg as twice a day after initial titration. The total duration of apremilast therapy in all groups was 16 weeks. Results In safety assessment, AEs were reported in 50%, 41.3% and 25% in Groups I, II and III, respectively (p <0.05) with nausea being the most common AE. In Group I, 10.53% of patients discontinued apremilast whereas 6.52% and 2.27% discontinued in Groups II and III respectively. Maximum number of AEs were seen in Group I in first week only (74.19%) compared with other groups. At week 16, on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PASI 75 was achieved in 31.43%, 42.4% and 33.3% of patients in Groups I, II and III, respectively with no statistical difference between any groups. Conclusion It can be concluded that slower titration is a useful strategy for minimizing AEs while at the same time maintaining effectiveness of apremilast.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psoriasis : Targets and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"53 - 61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psoriasis : Targets and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PTT.S357184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psoriasis : Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PTT.S357184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:为了减少不良反应(ae),建议在治疗开始时滴定阿普米司特。但是,仍然有许多患者经历不良反应,导致停止治疗。因此,许多皮肤科医生已经适应以不同的方式进一步滴定阿普米司特。本研究旨在评价阿普雷米司特以不同剂量滴定方法作为起始疗法治疗斑块型银屑病的安全性和有效性。在这项开放标签、随机、前瞻性、比较、三组、单中心的研究中,纳入了128例斑块型银屑病患者。患者随机分为三组。第一组前6天采用标准滴定;II组接受所有药片的起始包,每天一次(OD),共13天;III组分别给予阿普雷米司特10 mg、20 mg、10 mg、30 mg两组起始包,每组8片,共26天。各组均在初始滴定后给予阿普米司特30 mg,每日2次。各组阿普米司特治疗总持续时间为16周。结果在安全性评价中,ⅰ组不良反应发生率为50%,ⅱ组为41.3%,ⅲ组为25% (p <0.05),其中恶心是最常见的不良反应。在第一组中,10.53%的患者停药,而在第二组和第三组中分别有6.52%和2.27%的患者停药。与其他组相比,I组仅在第1周出现ae数最多(74.19%)。第16周,在银屑病面积和严重程度指数方面,I、II和III组分别有31.43%、42.4%和33.3%的患者达到PASI 75,两组间差异无统计学意义。结论在维持阿普雷米司特疗效的同时,减慢滴定速度是减少不良反应的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Open-Label, Randomized, Prospective, Comparative, Three-Arm Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Apremilast with Three Different Titration Methods in Patients with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis in India
Purpose To minimize adverse effects (AEs), apremilast is recommended to titrate at the initiation of therapy. But still, many patients experience AEs, resulting in discontinuation of therapy. As a result, many dermatologists have adapted to further titrate apremilast in different ways. The present study was planned to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of apremilast in different dose titration methods as initiation therapy in the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Patients and Methods In this open-label, randomized, prospective, comparative, three-arm, single center study, 128 plaque psoriasis patients were included. Patients were randomized into three groups. Group I received standard titration for the first 6 days; Group II received all tablets in a starter pack as once a day (OD) total for 13 days; and Group III received two starter packs as 8 tablets each of apremilast 10 mg and 20 mg as OD and 10 tablets of 30 mg as OD, in total for 26 days. All groups received apremilast 30 mg as twice a day after initial titration. The total duration of apremilast therapy in all groups was 16 weeks. Results In safety assessment, AEs were reported in 50%, 41.3% and 25% in Groups I, II and III, respectively (p <0.05) with nausea being the most common AE. In Group I, 10.53% of patients discontinued apremilast whereas 6.52% and 2.27% discontinued in Groups II and III respectively. Maximum number of AEs were seen in Group I in first week only (74.19%) compared with other groups. At week 16, on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PASI 75 was achieved in 31.43%, 42.4% and 33.3% of patients in Groups I, II and III, respectively with no statistical difference between any groups. Conclusion It can be concluded that slower titration is a useful strategy for minimizing AEs while at the same time maintaining effectiveness of apremilast.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信