欧盟国家社会保障绩效评价:多标准决策分析(MCDA)

IF 1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
M. Marković, J. Stanković, Panagiota Digkoglou, I. Marjanović
{"title":"欧盟国家社会保障绩效评价:多标准决策分析(MCDA)","authors":"M. Marković, J. Stanković, Panagiota Digkoglou, I. Marjanović","doi":"10.35784/pe.2022.2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims to rank European Union (EU) countries according to the composite index, which uses selected social protection indicators from the relevant database at EU level – Eurostat. The total score of social performance for 2020 was determined using the CRITIC-TOPSIS framework. The study showed that Austria, Luxembourg and Germany, respectively, had the best level of social protection, while Latvia, Romania and Spain were at the bottom, as the countries with the worst values of indicators. The importance of research is reflected in the fact that the social component of sustainable development is still not sufficiently researched, especially when it comes to the application of multi-criteria analysis methods in the empirical analysis of social sustainability. In this regard, de- pending on the obtained performance values, socio-economic policymakers can redesign existing measures and programs, as well as the amounts of social transfers to certain EU member states. The authors expect that the results of the study will help build higher social standards and well-being in the EU.","PeriodicalId":44696,"journal":{"name":"Problemy Ekorozwoju","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Social Protection Performance in EU Countries: Multiple-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)\",\"authors\":\"M. Marković, J. Stanković, Panagiota Digkoglou, I. Marjanović\",\"doi\":\"10.35784/pe.2022.2.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper aims to rank European Union (EU) countries according to the composite index, which uses selected social protection indicators from the relevant database at EU level – Eurostat. The total score of social performance for 2020 was determined using the CRITIC-TOPSIS framework. The study showed that Austria, Luxembourg and Germany, respectively, had the best level of social protection, while Latvia, Romania and Spain were at the bottom, as the countries with the worst values of indicators. The importance of research is reflected in the fact that the social component of sustainable development is still not sufficiently researched, especially when it comes to the application of multi-criteria analysis methods in the empirical analysis of social sustainability. In this regard, de- pending on the obtained performance values, socio-economic policymakers can redesign existing measures and programs, as well as the amounts of social transfers to certain EU member states. The authors expect that the results of the study will help build higher social standards and well-being in the EU.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problemy Ekorozwoju\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problemy Ekorozwoju\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.13\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy Ekorozwoju","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.13","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文旨在根据综合指数对欧盟(EU)国家进行排名,该指数使用从欧盟层面的相关数据库-欧盟统计局中选择的社会保护指标。2020年社会绩效的总分是使用critical - topsis框架确定的。研究显示,奥地利、卢森堡和德国的社会保障水平最高,而拉脱维亚、罗马尼亚和西班牙则垫底,是指标最差的国家。研究的重要性体现在对可持续发展的社会组成部分的研究仍然不够充分,特别是在社会可持续性实证分析中多标准分析方法的应用方面。在这方面,根据获得的绩效值,社会经济政策制定者可以重新设计现有的措施和计划,以及向某些欧盟成员国提供的社会转移支付金额。作者期望这项研究的结果将有助于在欧盟建立更高的社会标准和福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Social Protection Performance in EU Countries: Multiple-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
The paper aims to rank European Union (EU) countries according to the composite index, which uses selected social protection indicators from the relevant database at EU level – Eurostat. The total score of social performance for 2020 was determined using the CRITIC-TOPSIS framework. The study showed that Austria, Luxembourg and Germany, respectively, had the best level of social protection, while Latvia, Romania and Spain were at the bottom, as the countries with the worst values of indicators. The importance of research is reflected in the fact that the social component of sustainable development is still not sufficiently researched, especially when it comes to the application of multi-criteria analysis methods in the empirical analysis of social sustainability. In this regard, de- pending on the obtained performance values, socio-economic policymakers can redesign existing measures and programs, as well as the amounts of social transfers to certain EU member states. The authors expect that the results of the study will help build higher social standards and well-being in the EU.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Problemy Ekorozwoju
Problemy Ekorozwoju ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信