{"title":"自然权利:是,也不是","authors":"Aleksandr Vasilyevich Gribakin","doi":"10.24923/2222-243x.2022-44.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author differentiates between the idea of belonging natural rights to people and the concept of natural rights that claims scientific approach. Intuitively feeling as creators of their rights, people periodically shook the thrones. Not knowing the actual sources of people's rights, thinkers of the previous epochs called them natural. It is alleged that the source of people's rights and obligations is their working activity.","PeriodicalId":41181,"journal":{"name":"Kant Yearbook","volume":"144 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural rights: yes and not\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandr Vasilyevich Gribakin\",\"doi\":\"10.24923/2222-243x.2022-44.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author differentiates between the idea of belonging natural rights to people and the concept of natural rights that claims scientific approach. Intuitively feeling as creators of their rights, people periodically shook the thrones. Not knowing the actual sources of people's rights, thinkers of the previous epochs called them natural. It is alleged that the source of people's rights and obligations is their working activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kant Yearbook\",\"volume\":\"144 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kant Yearbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24923/2222-243x.2022-44.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kant Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24923/2222-243x.2022-44.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The author differentiates between the idea of belonging natural rights to people and the concept of natural rights that claims scientific approach. Intuitively feeling as creators of their rights, people periodically shook the thrones. Not knowing the actual sources of people's rights, thinkers of the previous epochs called them natural. It is alleged that the source of people's rights and obligations is their working activity.
期刊介绍:
The Kant Yearbook is an international journal that publishes articles, historical or systematic, on the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. It is the yearbook′s goal to intensify innovative research on Kant on the international scale. Articles are double-blind peer reviewed by an internationally renowned editorial board. Each issue is dedicated to a specific topic announced through a call for papers.